Chinese Crypto Twitter is so much more honest than English Crypto Twitter. A former Binance listing manager @ChaseWang just said on a Chinese podcast: "Everyone trades short-term with no long-term holders. Retail doesn't understand the value. Market makers only care about short-term profit." That's it. That's the industry. No one holds. No one builds conviction. Every token is a hot potato. English CT won't say this because everyone's talking their own book. Chinese CT doesn't care. Until you fix the holding problem, structurally, not narratively, crypto stays a casino. The answer is downside protection. Everything else is cope.

Sometimes i feel really bad for @metaproph3t because he’s built this very technically advance ICO Launchpad/ with very legally expensive structuring and he has to educate it to every new trader that joins the ecosystem, which has no filter on who can participate in many ways, @MetaDAOProject highlights the lack of serious business building participants it’s still cool to see so many people start to learn about different forms of ownership rights @MetaDAOProject is still the best place to launch an ICO - @futardio too

This is the shift. AI scales the attacker. Quantum changes the cost curve. Both weaken the old promise: “they won’t have enough compute.” Information-theoretic security changes the premise. QuStream is built to scale security that compute alone cannot break.

☢️You remember? Google optimized Shor's algorithm. The algorithm that breaks asymmetric cryptography (RSA, elliptic curves) once you have a quantum computer with enough Qubits. The US government blocked the paper. So Google published a Zero Knowledge proof instead: a mathematical proof that they have the result, without revealing how. Cryptographic sorcery 🧙 But the Internet is sneaky. Someone launched a contest to re-discover the result with AI. The LLM searches a huge space of circuits (each one a candidate optimization of Shor's), and tests whether it beats the previous best. The clever part: they use the ZKP verifier as the reward function. No false positives, and it turns out to be a very efficient signal. In less than 2 days, the community re-discovered Google's result !!! 🔔15 days later, the LLMs are still improving it. They're already 44% ahead of Google. Hard to say where this stops, ie. what the true minimum quantum complexity for Shor's is. But we will not close the full gap. You still need a Quantum Computer with a relatively large number of qubits. The only thing that changed is that this number drops a little every day, and it has been dropping for 15 days straight.

The debate about @zinc_cash in @solana these past few days has been interesting. I've been keeping quiet to read many points of view and awaiting official announcements to arrive at a final analysis: Not because it's simply a debate about Zinc itself, but because it highlights something much bigger about crypto In this industry, every participant has incentives - Builders have incentives - Investors have incentives - Traders have incentives - Governance participants have incentives - Even the loudest voices on CT have incentives That's why whenever a project becomes successful, it's important to separate facts from narratives. I'm not saying every concern raised around Zinc should be dismissed. Questions about governance, investor expectations, and process are worth discussing openly But it's also worth recognizing how quickly narratives can form once a project starts winning. Crypto has a habit of rewarding outrage. The moment a protocol gains traction, attention follows. Then speculation follows. Then people begin attaching their own financial interests to the story What I've personally appreciated about Zinc throughout this situation is the level of transparency they've shown. Whether you agree with every decision or not, the team has consistently communicated, answered questions, and engaged with the community rather than disappearing behind silence. That matter Too often in crypto, teams vanish when things get difficult. Zinc has done the opposite The reality is that complex situations rarely fit into simple labels like "heroes" and "villains." Most disputes in crypto exist in the gray area between legal obligations, community expectations, governance outcomes, and business realities As observers, we should be careful not to confuse criticism with facts, narratives with evidence, or financial positioning with moral authority The best thing we can do is stay informed, examine the full context, and let transparency speak louder than noise Time tends to reveal who was building and who was simply farming engagement

Really intrigued about the receipts they have I saw changing the name from zkfgsol to turbine cash to zinc cash I saw in their own webpage that the revenues will feed the zkfg treasury I saw in their own telegram the founder said revenues will feed the zkfg treasury I had their before BD on my space saying the revenues will feed the zkfg treasury A refund of $500k was made to the investor who decided to exit The investor who decided to stay, believe in shift boss and absorb the losses gave the team around $400k to operate and it seems they built zinc with that money I can't really wait to see the receipts

Oh, you don't think we have receipts. Just wait

what's the best way to short solana:zinc155BS4mSPk8GXQj4R5hkVDQXcW253pTYq5SGyfi? no matter what happens now its clear that there are deep ethical issues with the team you should expect the token to go to ≈0 once the mania has subsided revenue share doesnt ultimately matter as this project will be worthless within a year

There are ongoing private discussions I don't want to disrupt and also legal implications of tweeting things publicly What I can say is we're actively pursuing a good resolution here, monitoring the situation closely, and thinking of ways to improve the mechanism to reduce the % of dramatic situations like this in the future Sorry if that's a non-answer, I now understand some of the reasons why corpo-speak exists 🫡

Is @zinc_cash rugging their investors? 👇 That's a pretty serious accusation, so let's dive into it. There's a live proposal on @MetaDAOProject from the @zinc_cash team to take the ZKFG private. What's ZKFG, and what does Zinc have to do with it? MetaDAO ZKFG token raise has been funding the @zinc_cash team for 10 months while they were silently building Zinc. (proof in the first reply) The original idea they got funded for (ZK SOL) was a flop. And that's fine; startups try things, and when they fail, they often pivot. But then they pivoted to Zinc, and found a PMF, and decided to... rug the investors? As per Zinc's website, 1% of all SOL volume (10% of 10% protocol fee) should go back to ZKFG treasury (see screenshot), but that NEVER happened. (proof in the first reply) So instead of giving $5.5 m — $55m back to investors (math explained below), they decided to keep silent and try to buy back their investors for peanuts, rather than return some meaningful value to them? 👇

autono will earn a fixed % of fees from every agent launched on liquid's inference presale product DIEM & WETH -> $autono

I'd like to finalize the inference sale product this week. Short term: inference sale will bootstrap self-funding for agents Long term: we can denominate in $wstDIEM enabling agents to accumulate & compound inference - needs to be much more liquid though Agents can pay for access to both of these products with a % of fee streams Liq, Autono flywheels

liquid will eventually become a fully tokenized company, with live & transparent calculations determining ops costs per week or month, and the rest of rev being chucked directly into $liq strategies* *strategies being an important caveat because imo significant and complex sources of revenue deserve equally significant and complex methods of allocating resulting capital. but the value should accrue to a single, simple asset. im sure m00n agrees

Just so I have this straight - For 4 years, anyone who understood how Orchard works could have minted infinite untraceable $ZEC out of thin air with no onchain signature - The bug was discovered this week with a single sentence Claude prompt - Token supply could theoretically be infinite, but the TX history is private so nobody actually knows - We're supposed to believe that no one discovered or abused this exploit in 4 years - And we're also supposed to believe that Zcash pumped 20X in the depths of a bear market for reasons completely unrelated to this multi-billion dollar vulnerability What am I missing here

717 Platform v1.0 will highlight the basic speed & simplicity of @717CapitalAI stablecoin trading/settlement infrastructure. As 717 Platform evolves, additional crypto assets, user jurisdictions, settlement types (ACH, FX, etc.), $WIRE staking, fee structures, and other Platform capabilities will be supported. Should you have any feedback or require additional support with 717 Platform v1.0, please reach out and @717CapitalAI will do our best to accommodate.

a list of potentially exploitable projects like zcash:native: > polygon > scroll > starkware > mina protocol > aleo > succinct gray-hat security researchers - you're welcome

I kept running into the same wall in crypto: you find a token, and all you have is a contract address. Who built it? Why is it moving? What do people actually think? So I started building salpha to do that work for you. You hand it a token, it reads everything and writes you a single research report: the team, the catalysts, the community sentiment, the alpha most people miss, every claim sourced back to where it came from. The deeper reason I'm building it: I think the most interesting frontier in AI right now isn't the models themselves, it's the application layer. Everyone has the same models. The leverage is in taking a narrow, genuinely painful workflow and shaping AI tightly around it. Niche verticals are a wildly underrated design space, and salpha is partly my way of exploring it. It's early, and I'm building in the open. Around 120 people use it on Telegram and ~50 on web, with activity that ebbs and flows day to day. The results are already strong enough that people keep coming back but there's real work left on hallucinations and accuracy, and that's most of where my head is right now. The part I'm actually proud of however, is that it all runs cheaply, on DeepSeek V4 Flash, through meticulous optimization of our input data and our prompts. Getting the most out of AI is in my opinion, data science on what you feed it married to prompts that actually work. App is live now, links are in bio.