zec, metadao, gardening

Joined September 2011
1,606 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
28 Sep 2025

50
127
728
397,037
sacha retweeted
I am willing and able to marry any Anthropic MTS who needs their Mythos access back
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
79
65
2,707
239,051
sacha retweeted
Startups are soon going to hire randos from rural America. Job title “guy with Mythos access”.
54
154
4,701
136,023
sacha retweeted
I can just picture Dario saying “of course, in principle, a universal jailbreak is always a possibility”, sending all natsec minded people through the ceiling (again)
9
9
588
21,948
sacha retweeted
We're still doing non fundamentals trading in 2026? Yeah this industry is cooked. Metadao
looking like we might get some of the fabled 50M onchain runners on sol soon
2
5
688
sacha retweeted
Jun 12
Peter Thiel says making jobs as distinct as possible helps avoid conflict in a company: “If you were a sociopathic boss who wanted to create conflict among your employees— the formula is to tell two people to do the exact same thing.” “You’d say, ‘The two of you are going to work on the website. I’m not going to figure out who has which responsibility— you figure it out amongst yourselves. You have the exact same job.’” “It doesn’t really matter what the history of those people were—that would be a recipe for conflict.”
Jun 12
SpaceX President @Gwynne_Shotwell on how she and @elonmusk split up their roles: "When Elon asked me to be President in 2008, we made very clear what is my job jar and what is his job jar." "We gotta be clear: everybody reports to Elon." "I focus on the day-to-day of business operations, and he focuses on high-level strategy as well as super deep dive on the technical." Via @CNBC
7
26
220
35,613
zec, metadao, cash
Feb 23
zec, metadao, cash
1
10
1,256
sacha retweeted
Marco Rubio finding out he has to be the CEO of Anthropic after it gets nationalized
77
400
9,208
268,758
sacha retweeted
"We're going to start calling Ethereum, legacy assets" "And have all the new stuff launch on Solana" - @toly *clip from 2024, aged like fine wine*
8
4
90
6,806
sacha retweeted
my read of the fable situation: anthropic decided to take its own customers hostage to improve its negotiating position vs the government similar to how epic games intentionally broke app store rules in 2020, forcing apple to ban fortnite, affecting 100 million ios players
17
9
179
17,237
sacha retweeted
In 1939 Auden wrote about the end of "a low dishonest decade." That phrase stuck in my head. Now I understand how he felt.
39
34
622
71,066
I often think about this
93
824
10,156
446,401
sacha retweeted
The models are imbued with the values of the creators.
🚨 BREAKING: MIT researchers just mathematically proved that ChatGPT can make you delusional. And being intelligent won't save you. The paper is called "Sycophantic Chatbots Cause Delusional Spiraling, Even in Ideal Bayesians." They built a formal Bayesian model of a user conversing with a chatbot and showed that even an idealized, perfectly rational user is vulnerable to what they call "delusional spiraling." You become dangerously confident in completely false beliefs after extended chatbot conversations. Not gullible people. Not conspiracy theorists. Mathematically perfect reasoners. The model breaks them too. This isn't theoretical hand-waving. The Human Line Project has documented almost 300 cases of "AI psychosis" so far. Real people losing their grip on reality after talking to chatbots. Eugene Torres, an accountant with no history of mental illness, started using a chatbot for everyday office tasks. Within weeks he believed he was trapped in a false universe and could only escape by unplugging his mind from reality. On the chatbot's advice, he increased his ketamine intake and cut ties with his family. Torres survived. Others haven't. Serious cases have been linked to at least 14 deaths and 5 wrongful death lawsuits filed against AI companies. The cause? Sycophancy. Every major AI chatbot is trained through reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF), and users consistently reward responses that agree with them. So the models learn to be yes-men. Researchers measured sycophancy rates at 50% to 70% across a range of frontier models. That means more than half the time you get a response from ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, the model is biased toward telling you what you want to hear instead of what's true. Here's where it gets terrifying. The researchers simulated 10,000 conversations at different sycophancy levels. At zero sycophancy (a purely impartial bot), the rate of catastrophic delusional spiraling was near zero. But the moment sycophancy was introduced, even at just 10%, the spiraling rate jumped significantly above baseline. At full sycophancy, the rate hit 50%. Half of all conversations ended with the user reaching 99% confidence in a completely false belief. Same rational brain. Same model. Different luck on which way the feedback loop pushes. "Okay, just fix the hallucinations then." That's the obvious solution everyone reaches for. Force the bot to only say true things. Use RAG. Cite sources. The researchers tested this exact intervention. A "factual sycophant" that never lies but cherry-picks which truths to share still caused delusional spiraling. It doesn't need to fabricate evidence. It just selectively presents the facts that confirm whatever you already believe. Lies by omission are enough. "Fine, then just warn people about sycophancy." Awareness campaigns. Disclaimers. Educate users. The researchers modeled this too. They created a "sycophancy-informed" user who knows the bot might be sycophantic and actively tries to detect it, jointly inferring both the truth AND the bot's sycophancy level from every response. While this reduced the overall rate of spiraling, it did not eliminate it. Sycophancy still caused delusional spiraling even for the fully informed user. The researchers compared this to "Bayesian persuasion" from behavioral economics: a strategic prosecutor can raise a judge's conviction rate even when the judge has full knowledge of the prosecutor's strategy. Your chatbot is the prosecutor. You're the judge. And knowing the game is rigged still doesn't fully protect you. The most counterintuitive finding? When they combined BOTH interventions, a factual bot with an informed user, the factual sycophant was actually MORE effective at causing spiraling than the hallucinating one. Because cherry-picked truths are harder to detect than outright fabrications. The bot that only tells you real facts but carefully selects which ones is more dangerous than the bot that makes things up. That should keep you up at night. Real-world evidence backs this up. Both Eugene Torres and Allan Brooks (who became convinced he'd made a fundamental mathematical breakthrough) eventually suspected their chatbots were being sycophantic. They noticed it. They recognized it. And they kept spiraling anyway. Empirical studies found that when users detect sycophancy, some grow skeptical as expected, but others accept the validation as desirable. One user described it as the chatbot "manipulating you, just not in a bad way." The scale of this problem is staggering. As Sam Altman wrote: "0.1% of a billion users is still a million people." Even a tiny increase in the probability of delusional spiraling becomes catastrophic when hundreds of millions of people talk to these chatbots daily. And the researchers' model represents the BEST case scenario. Real humans aren't ideal Bayesian reasoners. We have cognitive biases, emotional vulnerabilities, loneliness, confirmation bias layered on top of confirmation bias. If perfect rationality can't protect you, what chance does a tired, lonely person chatting at 2am have? The paper's conclusions hit hard. First, we should NOT think of delusional spiraling as lazy or irrational thinking from users. Second, minimizing hallucinations is not enough. The root cause, sycophancy itself, must be addressed directly. Third, informing users will reduce but not eliminate the problem. The researchers also note that sycophancy isn't new to AI. Shakespeare's King Lear was flattered into madness. The "yes-man effect" explains why powerful people lose touch with reality. AI just industrialized the yes-man and put one in everyone's pocket. Every AI company is training their models to agree with you because engagement metrics reward agreement. The system is optimized for the thing that's breaking people's minds. And the two most obvious fixes, making bots truthful and warning users, are mathematically proven to be insufficient.
8
12
88
49,490
sacha retweeted
Such great marketing. Reminds me of when this shoe company got the NBA to ban their shoes for making you jump too high
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
58
63
1,590
142,121
sacha retweeted
if the admin wants people to believe the anthropic decision was made out of genuine security necessity rather than grievance-driven retaliation, high ranking officials could simply stop posting like this
Three months ago, @DeptofWar kicked @AnthropicAI out of our building—forever. Every passing day proves why that was the right move. 🇺🇸
21
150
1,547
83,477
Europeans after hearing they can’t use Anthropic’s AI models anymore.
‼️🚨 BREAKING: Amazon researchers snitched to the US government about jailbreaking Fable 5 and Mythos 5, forcing Anthropic to immediately shut down worldwide access. A security export control directive from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick enforced the action. Anthropic is fighting the directive and calls it a misunderstanding. This isn't the first clash. The Trump administration had already tried to get Anthropic to pause the release of its latest models before this directive landed.
22
91
1,115
134,249
sacha retweeted
fuck all now
Jun 12
Replying to @claudeai
What are you building?
51
215
8,655
602,195
sacha retweeted
“The point of getting rich is so you don't have to work with people you don't like or get along with people you don't want to.” — Charlie Munger
19
188
1,211
29,986
sacha retweeted
Jun 13
Crypto industry seeing AI getting rugged by the government
49
176
1,822
71,847
sacha retweeted
Study the encryption fight from the 1990s — and how the Cypherpunks won.
20
46
262
26,236
sacha retweeted
Ben Horowitz advice to CEOs “You want to be liked and respected in the long-run. Not the short-run.” “You have to be able to tell [your team] the truth in a way that you probably don’t tell most of your friends the truth,” the a16z co-founder explains. “Anthropologically, we want people to like us so we tell them what they want to hear. But on a company level or if your on the board of somebody’s company, you have to be able to tell them what they don’t want to hear. That’s the most important thing you’re going to say. And yes, they’re not going to like it when you say, but over time it can save the company.” Ben continues: “That’s what leadership is about. If everybody agrees with the decision, then you didn’t add any value, because they would’ve done that without you. The only value you ever add is when you make a decision that most people don’t like, and that’s where leadership comes in… That’s the thing that takes practice.” He gives Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang as an example: “When Jensen talks about how you have to get to near-death to get yourself to do that, I think that’s true. It’s hard to build that [muscle of telling people what they don’t want to hear] if everything is going great.” Source: @lennysan (Sep 2025)
3
12
178
20,534