Bearmarket survivor | OverInvested | speaking on spaces | don't know wen to sell | doing different web3 stuff

Joined June 2021
800 Photos and videos
lesson in here 👇 that is how you attract quality builders and products on chain "bUiLd aNd ThEy WiLl CoMe" 🤌
1
1
15
839
Remember when @beniaminmincu met with Charles a while ago? 😂 maybe he learned a thing or two
8
487
aDAMNonX retweeted
We’re excited to @BuildOnStellar and enter the next stage of our growth🔥 @StellarOrg is building real momentum, from DTCC’s tokenization plans to @MoneyGram $MGUSD launch. But on-chain DeFi remains underserved. That’s where XOXNO will create real value: better UX, stronger lending infrastructure, and a new architecture for on-chain finance.
20
45
174
10,726
revolutionary post now explain how projects in the ecosystem that were forced to be listed in pair with $EGLD got rekt & their price was dragged down even if they paid ton of money & were listed on CEXs in pair with $ wen open space w the community? double standards much?
Decouple, minimizing correlation, standing on our own terms For most of its history, this market has moved as one body. When Bitcoin rose, everything rose with it. When Bitcoin fell, even the strongest networks fell too, regardless of what their teams had built, shipped, or proven. That gravitational pull made it easy to forget a simple truth: not all crypto is the same, and not all of it should be priced as though it were. The last six to twelve months brought the cost of that into focus. Growth stalled. Headwinds settled across the ecosystems. And too often, the value of real work was decided by forces no builder could influence. We do not believe that is the future MultiversX is building toward, and we are no longer willing to leave EGLD's story to be written by Bitcoin. As we approach the Supernova genesis moment, we are taking deliberate steps to decouple EGLD from its direct correlation to BTC. We are clear-eyed about what this means: no team commands a market by decree. What we can do, and what we intend to do, is build, communicate, and position EGLD so that it is judged on its own terms, not on what Bitcoin happens to be doing on any given day. This means taking steps to delist some EGLD/BTC direct pairs, and give more proactive signal space to EGLD itself. We believe EGLD's value belongs where its contribution is greatest: in the throughput, the finality, the adoption, and the real-world utility of the network itself. Those are the things we control. Those are the things we are pouring ourselves into. And those are the things that, over time, earn an asset the right to stand on its own. Supernova is more than a launch. It is the moment we stop being treated as a passenger in someone else's story, and begin being weighted on our own merits. We are choosing decoupling, independence because we believe it is where MultiversX and EGLD have always belonged. To Supernova, and beyond.
5
4
34
3,515
are you proud of yourself @lucianmincu @beniaminmincu @SasuRobert ? build and they will come / best tek / best stack it's worthless if you don't offer what comes along with it you live in your own bubble heads while everyone that lost money and TIME on this chain got rekt
Another reason I stepped away is that I wanted to build. I wanted to code, develop, and create things. But I did not want to keep building inside an ecosystem where, after six months or a year of work, maybe making five euros is the only realistic outcome.
10
5
45
5,018
Oh no. "@BoberCTO gang is toxic" meanwhile 😂👇 happening exactly what we've said it will. this without even taking into consideration the dump on $HTM
Going to attract a lot of negativity for this one, but going to say it anyway. What happened to Soul Protocol from xLaunchpad? $EGLD #EGLd #MultiversX
3
2
10
1,423
Sergiu is leaving xPortal but nobody noticed / remember these 2 guys that now have in their bio "prev. Founder @xPortalApp" 😂 what was your contribution and on what terms did you leave? @bposytive @markoflux another successful story left in the air kek
24 Jan 2025
3/ New era brings in new leadership. We're beyond excited to welcome @markoflux and @bposytive, @alphalink_xyz co-founders, as our new xPortal CPO and CTO. Their vision, passion, and unique expertise will steer xPortal into even smarter, brighter territories.
6
22
4,325
aDAMNonX retweeted
Cool, but still useless from my POV Things that we will never see and I wish to: - Where is clearly stated that the foundation has shares in xMoney (I verified all public companies the final beneficiaries are the founders not the foundation, all 3 entities from Portugal, Romania and Estonia, dividends go to owners not to the foundation if is not there, there are two more entities not visible to see the end owners in Liechtenstein xMoney Global and xMoney Labs, probably used for the last raise or whoever knows why, that puts xMoney at already 5 entities) - How much foundation assets were distributed as “grants” to each individual company the Labs, xPortal, xMoney (since I am confident these got more than the protocol itself) - Why there are two labs one in Romania, one in LIECHTENSTEIN (old known as xWorlds, is this still funded by the foundation, if so why, how much it wasted, who is responsible for?) - Who owns the trademarks/IPs, as of public records all related IPs of MultiversX, xPortal are owned by another private entity not affiliated / reported in the above PDF) is this company getting paid by foundation for the holding or anything like that? listafirme.eu/meta-technolog… - How are you preventing self dealing between founders since the directors/board members of the foundation are the same people owning all other entities, there is no public accountability or larger board of people/advisors to that foundation that could hold accountable the council of the foundation. Every other foundation has public workers like Sol/Eth etc - Why no other core team member is visible as shareholder of labs or board members of the foundation? I would expect at least 3 more up there, the most important Adrian (you know the brain of the team) maybe Sasu, Andrei … I won’t even dare to ask for external people that would be too much of a request from my side :)) Basically as a summary of a very high end investigation and overall how industry and foundations works: You create the foundation, then you create your own companies, then you grant funds and pay your own companies to build on your own chain, then if these companies become profitable or you sell them you own nothing back to the foundation itself, that’s why is very important to see clearly the stakeholders of all these companies and prove the foundation owns these entities in full or in a percentage How do I know some of the stuff ? Well I do also have a foundation and an AG in the same environment as they do, clearly my foundation owns the AG is a simple document you can extract proving the ownership. For Romania companies is even easier since is public same for other EU countries like Estonia, Portugal etc. Except in Liechtenstein where privacy is the selling point :) At some point I will do my own overview and link well all entities I am aware of, if more people are interested, if everyone still wants to stay blinded then I will save my time and move on I tend in the past year to clearly see the management failure vs the clear success of the tech team(even if slow due to budget), is obvious incompetence (and hopefully not fraud) has been a key part of our sadly long downfall. The CEX liquidity shows it all if a whale would want to exit today there is no more than $20-30k liquidity on the buy side on the biggest CEXs, same on the sell side very hard to get an entry at this price unless OTC buying from them most probably What would save us, from my opinion? Probably a clean independent investigation into the foundation dealings over the years, seeing clearly what is still happening there in terms of assets and most important EGLD owned besides others tokens. A larger board and advisors in place, around 5 board with 5 advisors (community included that will have visibility into the real stuff happening there and be able to avoid any potential conflicts, rather than nobody seeing anything) In any case, ignore everything from above, what do I even know myself ;)
5 protocol upgrades, 6 successful governance proposals, and a 60% leaner footprint. Today we are releasing the State of the Foundation Report covering fiscal years 2024 and 2025. It provides $EGLD stakeholders with a detailed account of how the Foundation allocated funding, the initiatives and upgrades supported across the period, and the governance votes that shaped the network. files.multiversx.com/Multive…
26
18
105
8,156
Is the BD and marketing team in the room with us, or is it just tek that every other competitor actively improves?
100 security issues. Identified. Neutralized. AI in its current form is a nuclear force. Channeled right, it delivers pure, unadulterated, unmatched, productivity gains. Channeled wrong, it ships weapons, with attack vectors the world has never had to defend against. The next chapter will be defined by this duality: breathtaking productivity unlocks, colliding with deep, surgical, systemic attacks unlike anything we've seen. For any blockchain team, any open-source team, security is THE PRIORITY. The MultiversX team has been operating around the clock. Nights. Weekends. Relentless. Methodically filtering, triaging, and eliminating, in record time, a long list of material issues and protocol-level improvements. Every fix is another layer of hardening ahead of Supernova. To put things in perspective: in the last few months, we've surfaced and closed more issues than in the previous 3 - 4 years combined. This is the preparation phase. And the fact that AI has crossed a new capability threshold cannot be overstated. Supernova is not an upgrade. It is a complete rewrite of what a blockchain can be, instant performance, radical scalability, human UX that actually feels seamless, and just works. It also opens a new verifiable agentic highway. Real. Live. Working today. Continuously adaptive security will define the AI era—and almost no one is treating it that way. Static firewalls defended the old internet. Continuously adaptive security is what defines survival in the AI era. Our engineering team, along with a resourceful network of builders, validators, and community members, is doing the surgical, disciplined, vital work that shapes what comes next. This is MultiversX. This is SUPERNOVA.
2
11
1,942
$EGLD just GIGA pumped to $150
5
3
56
3,142
How about auditing those Sovereign Chains so that @OneFinityChain can finally launch. Original launch date from @MultiversX 2024 GM 2026
OGAudit Web3 Research: @MultiversX Is adaptive state sharding and high TPS the key to scalable smart contracts or is the chain still too underappreciated? MultiversX has been quietly developing one of the most scalable Layer-1 platforms: - Adaptive state sharding for parallel processing and high throughput (up to 100k TPS tested). - Secure Proof-of-Stake with fast finality and low fees. - Maiar Wallet and xExchange for user-friendly onboarding and DeFi. Is this an underrated gem for fast and scalable dApps or does it need more ecosystem momentum? What's your take on EGLD in 2026, bullish, neutral or waiting? Category: Proof of Stake (PoS) Ticker: $EGLD Circulating Supply: 29.54M Market Cap: $118.5M Market Cap Rank: #173 OG Score: 51.65 OG Score Rank: #83 You can find full OG reviews and more project information here⤵️ ogaudit.com/crypto/multivers…
4
7
59
3,763
sounds familiar?
Mar 3
have not seen many opinions worse than this in crypto a foundation building user facing products has the following consequences: i) if you are a team also building the same product a foundation is, then you have 0 incentive to remain on that chain because - you either outcompete them, in which case since the foundation owns the majority of tokens, they get more resources to compete with you - you arent able to compete in a free market because foundations by merely existing act as the "official" version of something, regardless of if the product is objectively better - even if the foundation product is not making a profit, they still undercut your demand and margins (this is not hypothetical, this happens in nations with nationalized sectors all the time) - and btw if a team is not making profit, then they also are not gonna get better at making the product ii) by virtue of the above, you then disincentivize new teams coming to build on the chain because why would they bother with such a handicap. so now you have disincentivized free market competition iii) this of course means that over time a single entity is the singular point of failure for several things on the chain, in which case there's no purpose to a blockchain. this team also has a very skewed feedback loop since it's not clear if they actually made a better product or they're just the official channel (see the DMV) iv) hence the means of production are controlled by the state v) congratulations you have reinvented communism and your chain is now dead the actual way this must work is the foundation sharing their information with the private teams to help them improve the gaps on the chain since they have more information by being perceived as the official channel
4
399
10 Dec 2025
the APR boost in the new #MultiversX economic model will only add selling pressure on $EGLD if the buyers fail to show up. there are of course staking agencies that contribute to the eco, but very few
14
4
36
4,138
6 Dec 2025
the supposedly $4-5M spent on audits can't protect users from internal human greed send it to 0 with haste or just wait until @HatomProtocol team is already doing that by constant sells and liquidity extractions even if the chart looks like this
6 Dec 2025
We are aware that that some competitors, forcefully redeemed people $EGLD. We are aware of that competitors are self updating their private pools minting USH with HTM then selling USH for USDC to repay long standing debt against HTM, while dumping on their holders. We are aware that 0% minting fees means you lose all your staking rewards that is around 8% today. We are aware that there is no transparency in the platform of who did what pr better say activity per wallet (years later millions dumped and no activities) Karma is real you bunch of scammers @As_Hatom If you are a hard code believer in @MultiversX still using these guys you are not going to make it…
2
4
13
1,894
30 Nov 2025
co-hosting with @OvidiuXBT would love to hear from @DBCrypt0 @solver_cs @IacobGeorgian @mihaieremia tag who you would like to join and speak. ofc and open invitation to core @MultiversX & @xAllianceDAO team members
2
7
407
26 Nov 2025
can a cockroach lift the ecosystem?
4
9
702
25 Nov 2025
I think it's time to redeploy some open spaces to cover what's happening or not on @MultiversX CC: @OvidiuXBT for co-hosting @DBCrypt0 are you still in the business, because I know for sure GRM is covering politics now 😂
12
8
47
4,694
24 Nov 2025
this is who you're mining against $BTC @ABTC
24 Nov 2025
Welcome to American Bitcoin @ABTC
2
700
19 Nov 2025
so...from 2 weeks full of spaces and calls they are now silent. no media coverage / CT or TG news reporting for the new upgrade, no outside people talking about it also I am confused are we building the roman empire or astronauts with supernova? 4 years and still waiting for a clear direction of mvx eco RWA, MEMEs, AI, SovereignChains, US, DAT, VCs, Institutions (not villages) everything is moving on chain but not on this chain remember gents, it's an attention game. nobody left to praise the great tek
4
15
1,424