I've been told this is not the way you're supposed to do comms for this sort of thing but here goes... š¤·āāļø
Today, the
@StartupCltn found ourselves tangled up in a Daily Mail piece.Ā Hereās how it went š
Yesterday we got an āurgentā email from a Mail journalist saying that we would be in a story they were writing as āpart of our campaign against the proposed Al copyright exemptionā (good to start with impartial journalism and facts in mind š). We were given a few hours to respond to claims of a conflict of interest because Entrepreneur Firstās COO Tom Shinner sits on our steering board while Matt Clifford (who co-founded EF) is advising the PM on AI opportunities.
This whole thing is hilarious to me for a few reasons.
First - the idea of drawing an Itās Always Sunny meme link between startup orgs & Matt is kind of unnecessary. It would be much weirder if we didnāt have links to Matt. And weirder still if the Government appointed an AI adviser who didnāt know anything about the AI ecosystem he was supposed to be advising on.
Second - Not only do we know Tom, Matt & EF, they and lots of other VCs are involved in our work including providing a lot of our funding. If the Mail had been interested in listening to what anyone had to say we would have happily told them. Funnily enough they didnāt bother & chose to completely ignore the statement we sent over instead of running it as any sort of response.
Third -Ā Even if youāre writing a hit piece, I think weād all prefer basic facts to be right - like the fact that Vinous Ali (my female deputy referenced in the piece) isnāt āMr Aliā. Or that Matt isnāt āthe tech oligarch for the UKā (as cool as that makes him sound).
And finally - we can argue about the exact right approach to AI policy. But I donāt think itās particularly surprising that weād be on the side of AI startups & making sure they stay & build their models/companies in the UK instead of leaving to take their jobs & innovation with them to places like the US (indeed thatās what Vinous was saying in Parliament...).Ā Side note: Iām personally just amazed that weāve found an issue where according to the Daily Mail the EUās policy is too deregulatory š
The truth is this stuff isnāt really about the Startup Coalition, itās not about Tom, itās not even really about Matt (though there's been a raft of hit pieces on him over the past few months). Itās actually about the Mail, their proprietor & their commercial interests. Of course, theyāre well within their rights to argue their case, Iād just politely suggest that they can make it by doing what Vinous did in openly contributing ideas to the legislative process rather than running pieces designed to defend their interests under the guise of impartial journalism.
Whatever your opinion on the rights & wrongs of AI and copyright you too can contribute to the Government consultation until 25th Feb. Iād genuinely encourage you to do so whatever your views