A judge in Sweden has jailed a man for just four years and five months after he forced his wife to provide sexual services for over 120 men in exchange for money. The defendant - who has not been identified - used threats of death and extreme violence, drugs, security cameras, isolation, and the remoteness of their home in order to force his wife to participate in his moneymaking venture. The court heard that at various times, the defendant threatened to kill his wife, pour gasoline on her, burn her alive, and cut off her fingers. He also drugged her and used a network of home security cameras to control her movements. Shockingly, the court dismissed 8 counts of rape against him because it claimed to be incapable of establishing that the victim had not slept with her abuser voluntarily. I don’t know about you, but if I’m afraid that my husband is going to cut off my fingers and set me on fire, I’m not going to feel safe in denying him sex. You’d think a judge would be smart enough to understand that, but standards have declined sharply in that field over the last few decades. bbc.com/news/articles/crlwxg…

WPATH is best understood as an extremist trans activist group that frighteningly contains many people with the license to practice medicine. They are guided by ideology and care nothing for evidence. Yet 🇨🇦 gender clinics proudly follow these fanatics.

Nightmare for a friend of mine. Please share.

A friend is trying to book an appointment with the NHS in Liverpool. It gave her this list of pronouns she might want to be addressed by:

You can now read the Rape Gang Inquiry report on the link below. static1.squarespace.com/stat… From Scotland to London, children were raped, trafficked, tortured, and murdered. Children as young as four years old were passed on and sold by their own mothers to men to be raped. Children endured decades of trafficking, filmed blackmail, "red rooms" of torture, animal rape, and witnessed murders of other girls. They were subjected to extreme violence including penetration by objects, strangulation, and backstreet abortions. Pure evil has been allowed to continue since as early as the 1950s. The majority of perpetrators were Muslim men, and the people paid to protect these children didn’t just turn a blind eye; some were directly involved in the abuse and rape. As we head into Stage 3 of the inquiry, we will be naming those individuals involved and pursuing private prosecutions. So far, the inquiry has held two weeks of hearings in London, initiated multiple criminal investigations, taken legal action against dozens of services, collected files and evidence, and continues to give survivors and families a platform. Some survivors are still being ignored and waiting for investigations to open. The NCA have still not responded to us and the interest of the NPCC is to safeguard the people we intend to name. I would like to thank MP Rupert Lowe for starting the inquiry, our team, all participants, the donors who made this possible, and, of course, the public for supporting us. Our work is far from over.

Mastectomy scars are now promoted to girls as something cool to aspire to. A 'look', a statement, a choice. So insulting to women who have no choice. So dangerous for vulnerable teen girls to sell them major surgery as just a fashionable change of image.

I’m going to unpack some of this. 1. The premise that women are unknowingly carting around a Y (with SRY) is massively over exaggerated. The risk of Surprise SRY is minimal. 2. The risk of Surprise SRY is, however, non-zero. But in reproductively healthy women who have had periods and, more definitively, had kids is as near to zero as one can map in science. 3. That is, if you are a person who got a period before 16yo (ish), who has ever been pregnant or who has had the kind of screens that are offered to women (like cervical screening) without any drama, I’d bet my house you don’t have SRY. 4. If you have proof you have popped eggs and/or seen your ovaries, you would be almost singular (literally in the scientific record, the second case to my knowledge) if you also have SRY, functional or otherwise. If that’s me, with my entirely healthy reproductive system and physiology, I’m writing myself into a paper. 5. If you are born appearing female but actually carting around a Y with an SRY, it will almost always make it’s presence felt during puberty. You won’t menstruate, your GP might then discover unusual anatomy etc. Nobody in the U.K. should be getting Surprise SRY. 6. Ironically, Mums to boys are the most likely confounder (via fetal microchimerism). It should not need to be said that picking up some cells from the baby boy you’ve carried in your belly doesn’t change your sex. The carrying of the baby boy, almost certainly from your own egg, refutes that. 🙄 7. If, despite being an apparently healthy woman, you get a Surprise SRY, that means you’re an interesting woman, not a man. It also means that you won’t be excluded from female sport. Because whatever your genetics, sport is divided on bodies. 8. The lay person’s fascination with genetics and the cultural position that DSDs are “just normal variation” has led a fair amount of even normally-sensible people down a dumb rabbit hole. They are medical conditions that are really rare. 1/20k is a binned frequency that we use in genetics to describe things that are really rare. It’s not a measured number, it’s almost qualitative.

To evade any ban by @Keir_Starmer ensure you have a copy of @torproject. This will keep you going even if they ban VPNs, torproject.org/download/. There are oodles of other ways but very technical i.e. cloud server hopping, installing netcat on a remote server, not using your ISP provided DNS, using a rooted phone, Star Link.

I see they've released this year's programme for the Edinburgh International Book Festival of Trans-activists 🙄 In a classic cowardly move, the activists who ensured the end of the festival's funding last time are front and centre. And the theme this time is "Changing Your Mind" It's SO Orwellian. They want us on our knees, begging: "Okay, yes, O'Brien, we give in, trans women ARE women, human beings CAN change sex. Please let us appear at your anodyne festival of trans-activist bullies" 😂 edbookfest.co.uk/news/full-2…

Swinney 'pandering' to Sturgeon over Supreme Court ruling | The Herald archive.is/2026.06.15-072153…

RT @thejournal_ie: The "pain and hurt” of two women allegedly abused by Jeffrey Donaldson is “still so visible”, a court has heard. Closin…

Just seen the video of baby Preston being startled awake by his adoptive father. That tired eyed look in toddlers is so familiar to anyone who has ever loved and cared for a child. He's so bewildered, then anxious. Then his attempt at a little smile towards one of the evil bastards who ended his life is utterly, utterly heartbreaking. How we have failed that little boy.

Morally bankrupt are those tarnishing the innocent minds of children.

OMG Denver Public Schools Board just voted UNANIMOUSLY to DISMISS lgbtq teacher Jennifer Honka after she reportedly made female students kiss each other and graded them on it What is going on in these schools?!

🚨 BREAKING: It has been revealed that the public consultation data Keir Starmer is using to promote his social media ban did NOT have an ‘against’ option

I’m actually a child online safety expert and was one of the pioneers in this space with Club Penguin and so I feel uniquely positioned to critique this. The groomer problem is real but it’s also vastly overstated. The far larger issue we saw at Penguin was suicidality or reports of sexual abuse in the home. There is no solution for lazy/bad parenting. You can implement all the ID laws you want but if parents are going to just hand kids their phones unlocked, those kids will have access to all the same things the parents have unfettered. What I found is that these draconian safety laws actually make it harder to be an honest operator of kids apps because on one hand it’s so much legal risk and so much user friction that it simply becomes uninvestible as a business. Parents will just lie to let their kids use the unfettered internet. For example, I have a friend who works in mobile gaming who has two kids, one above and one below the age limit but separated by just 2 yrs, and the two wanted to play and chat together on Roblox - which is reasonable. To do this, he just verified that his younger kid is old enough for the chat feature when he’s not. This happens all the time and will happen with these laws to. How far do we want to go with this? Scan the face of the user in real-time to make sure it’s not a kid using the device? We could do that but it feels like a massive unwanted intrusion of privacy. That’s how you know this law isn’t about kids. COPPA and GDPR-K and so forth already make it illegal to allow chat and other grooming vectors to kids. What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. And this is a far bigger issue that goes to core speech rights because if you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes. Starmer has already been doing this and he wants to do it at a much bigger scale. Starmer won’t even acknowledge the problem of actual grooming gangs in Britain’s neighborhoods but he’s worried about online grooming? No he’s not, and this hypocrisy gives away the game. What he wants is to kill online anonymity so he can enforce censorship of his unpopular policies. No politician should have this power.

'A pattern is emerging here. The Government says the right things about accepting the Supreme Court judgment on the primacy of biological sex, but ministers don’t seem keen on its implementation' @jamesmurray_ldn unherd.com/newsroom/labour-i…

Another political giant gone while we are surrounded with political pygmies. An interesting man with an interesting hinterland and a great writer. Sincere condolences to Labour friends. May he rest in peace.

Protect the sex dolls

I mean, for the love of the wee man, my own entire book has been setting out the argument that women deserve to be disagreed with more reasonably instead of getting their heads kicked in and losing their entire ability to earn a living. And the Edinburgh literary set can't even agree with THAT. Excuse me while I refuse to be lectured about not being more reasonable by people so lacking in decency they *continue* to contribute to a hellish cultural atmosphere and paint us as monstrous for being correct.