I wonder how people like you can read that essay and have such a myopic and adverse take.
- Do you not understand the dangers and risks Frontier AI poses to society, or do you not care about the rest of the world?
- Have you truly read the entire essay, word for word, instead of telling AI to give you a TLDR version?
- Do you not see that Dario is calling for the unanimous participation of government, AI companies, people, foreign democracies, and foreign governments?
- What about his essay incites control if not control over the AIs themselves (which, might I add, we desperately need) ?
- As the CEO of one of the two largest AI companies in the world, does he not have the credibility, experience, and insight to look ahead into the possible futures AI could facilitate and warn against the damming ones?
There are only one of two ways people like you can have this understanding:
1. You do not know OR do not care the extents of AI damnation on humanity, and you want the AI companies to give you and the world access to every new Frontier AI model release naively neglecting that there are bad actors in the world who would use those AI capabilities to engineer bioweapons 3,000x worse than COVID.
2. You are not naive. You are just selfish. Still blind to the negative outcomes AI in the wrong hands can cause you and your loved ones.
Either way, I urge you and others like you to think more long term, beyond your cravings for what Fable 5 unrestrained can do for you now and towards what 2 or 3 years of this constant rate of AI development without fast-paced, well-adjusted, well-meaning policies could mean for both you and me.
I feel slightly vindicated.
For years I warned about Anthropic’s dangerous philosophy and their obsession with "AI safety", which was never just about safety. It was always also about gatekeeping, central planning, and worldwide control over AI.
I was criticized for saying this.
Now people are finally starting to wake up.