#aging #rejuvenation #outlook #Community
@NatureAging just published a very nice piece describing the view on the field of aging from ~30 experts in the field, humbly yours including:
nature.com/articles/s43587-0…
In addition to reading the key messages that were nicely assembled by Sebastien Thuault and Hannah Walters, i strongly recommend to read supplementary material to that article, where each of the authors more extensively asnwers to these 10 questions - it is incredible source for discussions, debates and raw insights:
1. Is there one advance in aging or age-related disease research from the past 5 to 10 years that changed how you think about the field, and why?
2. What have we learned about translating geroscience from model organisms to humans, and where do the biggest gaps remain?
3. The field of aging is very broad, covering biology, clinical, public health and social sciences. Has your work or thinking been inspired by approaches or findings from separate disciplines?
4. Which single shared resource (e.g. dataset, biobank, model, tool) would most accelerate progress in your field?
5. How should we balance large, collaborative team science efforts and the focus and agility of individual labs to drive research forward? Should there be more big-team science in aging research?
6. Where do you see research on aging and age-related diseases having the biggest impact on clinical care and public health now and in the future?
7. If you could change one funding or regulatory policy to speed up progress, what would it be and why?
8. There is growing public interest in aging and age-related disease research. What can researchers do to ensure that aging science can be trusted and benefits everyone?
9. What advice would you give to researchers entering the field now?
10. Where do you see your field heading in the next 5 to 10 years?