Joined April 2012
2,173 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
For the record, my position on Bitcoin Core v30 is: Do not upgrade to v30 and do not run knots, until the dust settles. Now, you do you.
2
13
2,374
This is exactly what a retard fiat maxi sounds like. This sounds very sofisticated and too smart for 90% of people. Smokes screen while they steal your Bitcoins. Buy the real stuff, now
Replying to @parkeralewis
Price to Book (P/B) of any equity trades >1x when the expected Return on Equity (ROE) is greater than the Cost of Equity. The ROE of Bitcoin Treasury Companies can be greater than $BTC ARR, if the cost of leverage is lower than $BTC ARR. This is how leverage works for purchasing any asset. GBTC had no ability to take on leverage. It didn't have optionality with its capital structure or operations. Plus, it had a drag from its management fees.
1
1
177
I thought true Bitcoiners and maxis out there were able to think for themselves. Turns out, core 30 drama and Saylor cheerleaders have given us lots of clarity.
2
2
399
I appreciate Matthew because he’s able to cut through the noise and really think from first principles. You may or may not agree with him sometimes or often, but I wish there were more people la Matthew on X.
Why are you trying to muddy the waters for the plebs? Issuing MSTR and buying BTC with the proceeds when basic mNAV is less than 1.0 is dilutive for MSTR shareholders, and we both know that. You just did that last week. How much Bitcoin do you think Saylor is going to need to dump in order to pay the STRC dividend going forward? Or will he choose to massively dilute MSTR holders instead? By the way, I was a CFA charter holder, so I do know the answer to your first question, but I refuse to participate in your gaslighting. Gaslighting seems to be a company value over there
1
13
1,312
₿aseload 🍷 retweeted
Honest question to $MSTR holders, how will you believe anything that @saylor says from now on? He lied right to your faces.
82
65
420
43,205
He’s going to get sued by his shareholders isn’t he? Saying the opposite a few weeks apart. x.com/tristanblcktrnr/status…

Here is the answer on stage of @BTCPrague why Michael @saylor sold 32 BTC
7
3
52
3,438
Babe, summer vacation in Europe just got cancelled
Second night of US strikes against Iran
638
Few understand this
$MSTR holders are going to get rekt.
2
15
3,726
Self custody in cold storage. Is it still a thing in 2026?
13
30
3,134
$MSTR holders are going to get rekt.
34
11
104
15,680
It used to be “smash buy Bitcoin, never sell.” Now it’s „blobibulga blablabla” nobody understands anything anymore. It stinks
Replying to @mattkratter
The document you cite clearly states that BTC Yield is a narrow KPI used to assess per-share accretion solely as it pertains to bitcoin holdings. It is not a measure of financial performance, valuation, liquidity, ROI, book value, or stockholder return. Full financial analysis requires a more comprehensive review of our financial statements and SEC disclosures.
11
4
70
8,921
You can chase AI stocks at 10-20x their revenue right now, or you can buy deep value quality assets. It’s really is that simple when you embrace low time preference
Generational entry. $BTC
1
22
1,579
₿aseload 🍷 retweeted
Generational entry. $BTC
41
112
860
69,637
₿aseload 🍷 retweeted
Bitcoin and Mungers Rule. One has to wonder about the “AI is sucking up all the capital” narrative when nearly 8 trillion dollars still sits in money market funds earning a risk‑free yield, while fiat money loses something on the order of 8% of its purchasing power per year. In a market that noisy, the 200‑week Munger Rule is less a tactic than an x‑ray of who actually believes in compounding. Buy at the upward sloping 200-week moving average. Yes buy when there is blood in the streets. But emotions get in the way. The 200 week MA. It marks the point where price has already done the damage and narrative has followed it down, where momentum, flows and sentiment have all turned against you, and where long-term value quietly reasserts itself. Narrative follows price. When you should buy, you will not want to. The same is true of selling ( yes sell parabolic moves). The excess return is therefore not informational. It is behavioural. Most investors cannot do it. Emotions get in the way, simple human aversion to loss turn volatility into something to be avoided rather than harvested. I call it the Munger Rule. Have a nice day.
50
167
1,250
178,272
You will retrieve this tweet in 2-3 years. Bookmark it
How low does Bitcoin’s price have to fall before you Bitcoiners concede that I’ve been right all along?
4
789
“France”
📸 La 𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐨 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞 des Bleus pour la 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐩𝐞 𝐝𝐮 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 ! 🇫🇷 #FiersdetreBleus
2
2
511
So it is 11.5% but 8% down on principal (for now). How many fiat chasers got caught?
Pulled up a STRC chart 30 mins ago and in that time it’s down over a dollar Houston we have a problem…
1
625
lol. Wink wink
It's still Zcash or communism.
5
696
₿aseload 🍷 retweeted
Good evening. I’m getting a lot of questions about whether my conviction has been impaired or my thesis has changed about Bitcoin with its recent price weakness. The answer is an emphatic no. Why? Because I like to keep it simple and focus on first principles. While other assets are enjoying the warmth of the hot ball of money, Bitcoin will simply continue to reflect the debasement of all government sponsored currencies over the long run. Nothing more. Nothing less. Hope this helps. Have a great night.
119
233
2,818
79,719
Cringe vibes is an incredible leading indicator. That was just before Bitcoin tops out. And Saylor has been very cringy in May. Probably nothin’..?
Ngl, this all feels very topish. The chart and the cringe from the vegas bitcoin conf.
5
775