> The real story of this era will be who manages to avoid harming themselves in their AI psychosis.
this checks out and i see this in a few programmers and non-programmers i have met over the years. programmers feel they can do everything themelves. non-programmers suddenly feel they can program production code. LLM psychosis induces hybris, should be met with humility, IMO.
> Without fully endorsing all their ideas, I’m now in the LeCun/Marcus camp on LLMs. I don’t think models like this will ever be able to program, I think the process matters. I think that deep learning is still the solution, but real programming agents will need world models, not some RLVR shit that comments out the failing test and tells you all the tests are now passing.
i dont know enough about world models (but i will study up now!) but i think the part about "LLMs get 80% right and then screw up the polish" is consistent with my experience and i wonder if it's a fundamental limit
i don't know if i resonate so much with george's writings because we have the same name or believe similar things, or because i used limera1n as a kid but the last few writings hit the spot for me
geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll…