I need your expert opinion. My new RL book will be 100% about algorithms that train a parameterized function as a policy or a value function.
This parameterized function is, in today's practical applications, virtually exclusively a neural network.
A neural network today is virtually exclusively a deep one, so when today you say "deep neural network" or you say just "neural network," you mean the same thing. The same is true about "deep learning." When today you say "machine learning" or "training a neural network," you mean "deep learning," and the other way around.
So, I need your advice.
Should the book's title still be "The Hundred-Page Deep Reinforcement Learning Book," or can I simply and safely reduce it to "The Hundred-Page Reinforcement Learning Book" by explaining in the Foreword that the book is only covering the practical RL, which is today almost exclusively deep while the world deep is no longer meaningful in the same way as it was meaningful in 2012?