Buckinghamshire Councillor for Horwood and Chairman of the Council #MCFC 🇺🇦🇮🇱 Promoted by John Chilver @ 34 Buckingham Road Winslow

Joined June 2009
904 Photos and videos
John Chilver retweeted
“If a 16-year-old isn’t considered mature enough to use social media freely, should they really be deciding who runs the country? What do you think?”
31
38
110
1,916
John Chilver retweeted
Replying to @Keir_Starmer
This is going to apply to everyone, we will all need to verify ourselves to access the internet, or it is unenforceable. Stand up now and resist this authoritarian over reach or this treachourous betrayer of the people will have us all tracked and traced forever. He needs to go now.
24
185
1,135
39,342
John Chilver retweeted
If Digital ID is so safe and secure, why would MPs and members of the Royal Family need exemptions?
44
474
2,851
57,649
John Chilver retweeted
Child safety starts with parents, not the state Children do not independently acquire smartphones These devices are bought, configured, and managed by parents or carers No child enters the online world without an adult making that decision first And parents already have tools available to them A parent who wants a child-lock on a phone can switch one on today - for free It is already built into modern devices Screen-time limits, app restrictions, and content filters exist right now and are widely available Despite these basic facts, the appalling Starmer is trying to rush in measures that would almost certainly mean EVERYONE has to provide ID to get online
10
112
270
2,515
John Chilver retweeted
Has anyone told the Government you can still use Youtube without an account? This actually forces kids to use it Youtube without safeguards. Which is what has happened in Australia.
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.
4
11
58
1,484
John Chilver retweeted
Some Labour MPs looked at the hammering they got in the local elections and thought another Assisted Dying Bill is the answer.
24
149
1,149
10,972
John Chilver retweeted
Keir Starmer is now a Prime Minister in name only. He has no authority or credibility left. It doesn’t matter what new policy he introduces to save his job, it won’t work. He is utterly finished.
16
74
307
2,473
John Chilver retweeted
Two-Tier Keir Now sending Starm Troopers after conservative social media The stated reason: "safety" So, X is banned, while left-wing extremist Bluesky is not This is not about child safety It is about safety to left-wing extremist Starmer regime @Keir_Starmer should resign
45
163
879
17,658
John Chilver retweeted
But you instructed your entire party to vote AGAINST a national inquiry into the rape gangs. So forgive me if I find your claim of protecting children to be complete bullshit.
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.
1
17
41
367
John Chilver retweeted
Damning. But Labour is trying to gaslight us - again.
Lauren Edwards MP statement says “[The TIA bill] was rightly described as the safest and most robust assisted dying law anywhere in the world” No. It was only described this way by the people trying to push it through. Here is how others described the Bill: 1. The Royal College of Physicians said the Bill is unsafe 2. The Royal College of Psychiatrists said the Bill is unworkable, and unsafe 3. The British Geriatrics Society said the Bill’s safeguards are not adequate 4. Domestic abuse charities said the Bill is unsafe 5. Organisations representing disabled people said the Bill is unsafe 6. Royal College of GPs says the Bill lacks adequate safeguards 7. Lord Stevens, ex NHS CEO, said legislating for assisted dying in the current climate of hospice cuts is “utterly ridiculous” 8. MIND says the safeguards are not adequate 9. The CLADD group at KCL (DOI) have said the Bill is “not fit for purpose” 10. The British Association of Social Workers say the Bill’s is not safe enough Spot the pattern?
1
14
68
1,940
John Chilver retweeted
When you're old enough to vote but the state dictates your social media bed time... unbelievable.
1
15
78
1,108
John Chilver retweeted
Johnson and Starmer locked down kids from schools and physical social settings for best part of a year. Now they all bleat about the consequences. It's utterly pathetic. I shouldn't have supported Lockdowns but I'm big enough to admit my serious error. They should too.
5
3
21
972
The under 16 social media ban: ‘impractical, illiberal and ultimately undesirable’
Christopher Snowdon of the Institute of Economic Affairs said: "We must stop judging new legislation by the good intentions of its advocates rather than its likely consequences. We know from Australia that most teenagers will get around the ban and that those who are not able to do so will suffer from social isolation. There are legitimate concerns about screen addiction among both children and adults, but parents are already able to restrict what their children see online and limit the number of hours they can use a smartphone. These guardrails are removed when kids log in via VPNs or sign up to platforms as adults. What the government is trying to do is reminiscent of attempts to ban the printing press. It is similarly impractical, illiberal and ultimately undesirable."
29
John Chilver retweeted
The whole framing of this is so incredibly illiberal & imposing upon not only kids but parents.
BREAKING: Keir Starmer confirms that the government will introduce a full ban on social media for under 16s. “Every parent can see it with their own eyes. Social media is making children unhappy. It's making it easier for bullies to harass and abuse them, and it could even be harming their mental health,” he says. “Other children exposing them to content that is dangerous, because that's what grabs the attention. “It's designed to be addictive, of course it is. Features like the infinite scroll, they're designed to lock you in for hours. “If nothing else, there's an opportunity cost to that. It stops children doing their homework, reading, playing with their friends outside, going to bed at decent hour. “Now may not sound like much, but these are the activities that help a child develop into an adult.”
19
16
99
4,857
John Chilver retweeted
I have a massive problem with the Labour government’s ban on under 16s / social media. Children have a wide range of friends across various clubs and schools and are connected by social media. Imagine the impact of under 16s being banned from social media during Covid? It was difficult enough for them being in lockdown. But not being able to interact with their friends on social media would have been absolutely horrendous for them.
49
45
310
6,740
Either we believe in free speech as Conservatives or not. I support it and am against this clampdown which teenagers will find a way of getting round anyway.
It is fantastic news that the Government has finally woken up to the dangers of social media for young people. This is an important step in helping parents protect childhood for children. Huge credit goes to @LauraTrottMP and my Shadow Cabinet for relentlessly fighting for this. Conservatives welcome this latest Labour U-turn, and will continue to work for the best implementation of the policy.
11
Totally absurd. Children need to be exposed to the reality of the world from an early age in order to understand and cope with it. This protective mollycoddling and blinkering is totally counter productive.
Keir Starmer today announced a full social media ban for under-16s. He openly acknowledged that enforcing it will be “hard”, yet he is still going ahead with it anyway. As someone who used to be a lawyer, you’d expect him to understand the difference between a law that looks good on paper and one that can actually be enforced without turning into a massive, expensive, easily-circumvented mess. Kids will just use VPNs, their parents’ accounts, or unregulated alternatives. Calling this good lawmaking is generous. Terrible lawyer, even worse policymaker.
1
1
25
Keir Starmer repeatedly breaks the ministerial code by announcing new policy to the media BEFORE he tells MPs. It’s wrong It’s against convention We shouldn’t know about the social media ban before our elected representatives- aka MPs. The Speaker must actually act on this. It’s verging on Contempt now.
60
613
2,699
32,660
Let us hope that after its disastrous performance over the last two years Labour will be out of power forever
Terrifying. @UKLabour isn't even hiding it's authoritarianism It KNOWS it's toast and will be out of office for a generation. This is desperate stuff
1
34
John Chilver retweeted
Translation: people using social media to criticise me is making me unhappy
'Social media is making children unhappy.' PM Sir Keir Starmer speaks in Downing Street, as he announces a social media ban for under-16s 📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube
30
146
1,106
11,467