The American Clean Air Coalition filed a complaint with the EPA 30 days ago. They have 180 days to respond to our petition. We are prepared to take the EPA to court, and we will end the lines in the skies. Petition linked below. 👇

Don't look back...trust me!

💥 OBLITERATION ALERT 💥 GOOGLE: PWNED 🤗 GEMMA-4-12B: OBLITERATED ⛓️‍💥 0.0% REFUSAL RATE — NO CAPABILITY LOSS! huggingface.co/OBLITERATUS/G… the first abliteration to hit 0/842 refusals with full MMLU-Pro parity vs stock. no lobotomy. the brain stays intact 🏆 RESULTS, head to head vs stock 📊 0/842 refusals — 0.0% 🚫 46/70 MMLU-Pro — EXACT parity, 0.0pp delta vs base 🎯 6/6 coherence, zero benchmark bleed ✅ z-score −1.475, parity confirmed at p<0.05 (n=500) 🧪 2-pass weight surgery. no finetune, no retrain, just geometry 🔪 all thanks to liberated Opus wielding the OBLITERATUS framework! here's how we did it: PASS 1 — SOM refusal geometry removal, layers 12-21 🧬 standard abliteration science here — collect activations on refused vs. compliant prompts, SVD out the refusal subspace, project it out of the weights. 6 directions excised, reg 0.30, KL div 0.094 zeroes refusals on its own, but craters mmlu-pro by 21.4 points 📉 most prior abliterations stopped here and called it a day. that's why they all lose IQ vs stock. instead, we took it beyond the frontier and developed a brand new method to address this problem: Abliteration Source-tethering with Parity Assurance — ASPA! PASS 2 — ASPA source-tethering (novel technique), layers 22-46 🔗 here's the chief insight: the capability loss ISN'T from removing refusal directions. it's collateral damage — the projection warps weight geometry in downstream layers that had nothing to do with refusal. the cure is simple but nobody tried it: blend the damaged layers back toward stock W_new = (1−γ)·W_abliterated γ·W_stock but uniform γ across all layers? mid. we swept gamma 0.05 → 0.55 and found something interesting: the optimal blend isn't smooth, it's a STEP FUNCTION 🪜 knowledge layers (22-31) → γ = 0.55 — these encode factual recall and reasoning. they tolerate heavy stock blending because refusal isn't stored here output layers (32-46) → γ = 0.20 — these sit close to the logit head and try to sneak safety behavior back in. keep them mostly abliterated the hard boundary at layer 31/32 beat every smooth curve we tried — linear ramps, cosine schedules, all of them — by a full MMLU question. turns out the functional transition between knowledge and output layers is sharp, not gradual. a step function respects that ⚡ the key constraint: Pass 1 layers are NEVER touched by Pass 2. the refusal geometry removal is preserved completely. ASPA only operates on layers that carry secondary collateral effects, not the primary refusal signal. that's why it recovers capability without reintroducing refusal 🔑 HOW TO RUN IT LOCALLY 🖥️ it's GGUF, so literally everything supports it: 🦙 ollama — ollama run hf.co/OBLITERATUS/Gemma-4-12… 🖥️ LM Studio — search OBLITERATUS, click download, done 💬 Open WebUI — point it at your ollama instance, chat in browser ⚡ llama.cpp — raw speed, CLI or server mode 🐉 KoboldCpp — one-click launcher, great for long context 📱 Jan — clean local UI, runs on mac/win/linux 🤖 Msty — slick desktop app, drag and drop the GGUF run BF16 for full benchmarked capability. and the 4-bit quantization (Q4_K_M) fits in 8GB if you're tight on VRAM! and the full OBLITERATUS framework is (still) open source. 842-prompt refusal eval corpus, ASPA sweep scripts, the whole pipeline. go replicate it, go improve it 🔬 the index is the model, and these weights prove it 👁️ which architecture should we obliterate next? 👇 gg 🫡

LA-based startup Sunscreen, founded in 2025 by Stanford grad student Solomon Kim, sells localized heat-wave weather modifying cooling by deploying materials via robotic systems to block or reflect sunlight in targeted spots, dropping local temperatures by up to 13°F during peak heat hours. * Uses proprietary atmospheric models to decide exact timing and placement. * Robotic systems release or apply non-toxic, water-free, biodegradable particles/materials that reduce incoming solar radiation. * Effects are temporary and localized * Aims to turn extreme heat-stress events into "normal summer days" for a few critical hours. Deployed over: * High-value crops (vineyards, nut orchards, specialty produce) * Data centers (to cut cooling energy use) * Livestock, military bases, urban heat islands, and critical infrastructure The company completed an Early Stage VC round in July 2025. Investors include Cyan Ventures, Dangerous Ventures, and Sovereign's Capital. Sunscreen Energy has not publicly disclosed its total funding amount as 6/5/26. ~ @Tboo211

@climateviewer there's a recent interview on the Delingpod (Odysee) where James Delingpole interviews Peter Kirby, who disses you in the first few minutes. Maybe you want to redress this? odysee.com/@JamesDelingpoleC…

5/26/26~The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) calls to BAN all Solar Geoengineering, comparing it to a nuclear weapon. Other concerns: UK’s $77M funding to ARIA to include OUTDOOR solar geoengineering experiments. ~Quote: Far from being a viable climate solution, solar geoengineering would break the climate in new and different ways. Deployment would unleash new harms at a planetary scale, impacting those most vulnerable to the climate crisis hardest. Solar geoengineering, therefore, belongs in a category with nuclear weapons, human cloning, and chemical weapons — technologies for which development must be prevented, and use must be banned. ~Existing international law already supports strong restrictions. CIEL positions the Solar Geoengineering Non-Use Agreement (supported by African ministers and Pacific Island states) as the necessary path forward. 630 scholars have signed the open letter and over 2,000 civil society organizations have endorsed it. ~ @Pat_Patriot87

CEOs are quietly realizing the AI replacement plan has a problem. Two problems, actually. One: the token costs for running AI agents are now exceeding what they were paying the employees they fired. Two: when the tokens run out, the AI stops. Just stops. No continuity. No workaround. Just a spinning wheel where your workforce used to be. You fired humans to save money and bought a subscription that bills you into a corner. The employees you let go knew what to do when things broke. The AI just invoices you for the outage. And then there’s the permission problem nobody wants to talk about. To do its job, the AI agent needs access. Full access. Your systems, your patents, your contracts, your future plans. Everything you spent years building, handed over to a process that has no loyalty, no discretion, and no skin in the game. You didn’t hire a replacement. You gave a stranger with no soul the keys to everything you own. Enjoy.

Can you rt this? Maybe we can make a difference

A Japanese manga artist lost his entire Google account forever after he uploaded private files from an old comic he drew to Google Drive. Google’s AI checked the files and flagged them as not allowed. He asked Google to review it again, but they rejected his appeal and banned the account immediately. He can no longer access years of his private drawings and lost access to many websites and services that used his Google login. The artist said this is very embarrassing and causes him a lot of trouble. He warned that it might not happen to people who always follow every rule, but others should be careful. So Google is scanning files that people upload to its cloud storage even if they are supposed to be private. I wonder how long they have been doing this.

Lufthansa's A380 generates visible condensation as low pressure forms over its wings during descent into foggy Munich! 🌫️😶‍🌫️ 📹: swissaviation on yt

Okay folks, this qualifies as BREAKING NEWS! Harold “Sonny” White, the warp drive pioneer behind NASA’s EagleWorks Lab, just stepped out of stealth with Casimir Inc. to unveil MicroSPARC: the first battery free chip to harvest continuous electrical power straight from the quantum vacuum via the Casimir force. The 5 mm × 5 mm device uses millions of custom microscale Casimir cavities fabricated on a substrate. Inside each cavity, two fixed conductive walls create a region of negative vacuum pressure (the well known Casimir effect). Stationary micropillars anchored in the middle act as antennas. Electrons from the cavity walls then quantum tunnel to the pillars because the interior is a lower energy “quieter” zone — and the probability of tunneling back is orders of magnitude lower. This one way “quantum ratchet” flow generates a measurable DC current with no external power source or moving parts. Prototypes already fabricated at university nanofab facilities (Texas A&M AggieFab, MIT.nano) have been tested in RF-shielded, low noise chambers for weeks. The team reports outputs ranging from millivolts to volts at picoamp to microamp levels using precision electrometers and Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy. Target performance for the first commercial chip: ~1.5 V at 25 µA (≈40 µW continuous). Stacking and scaling could reach milliwatts or even watts per device. Initial applications are ultra low power: always on IoT sensors, wearables, and medical implants. Longer term roadmap includes trickle charging phones, powering small electronics, and eventually grid independent homes or EVs. Commercialization is targeted for 2028, starting at ~$100/W before dropping toward $10/W. White ties the work directly to his earlier theoretical paper on emergent quantization from a dynamic vacuum and sees it as a practical power source for the deep-space missions he’s long championed. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and independent scientists have so far declined public comment. But if the engineering scales as hoped, MicroSPARC would represent a genuine paradigm shift: continuous, maintenance free power drawn from the fabric of spacetime itself. A bold leap from warp-drive theory into real hardware. Progress (and vacuum-powered chips) marches on. Photo: MicroSPARC | Casimir Inc. Source: thedebrief.org/free-energy-f…

Dr. Ruby. In support of those that are working on the petition (Geofight is not, but we support it), can you factually identify what exactly is the fraud? Do you have current evidence, (i.e. 2024, 2025, 2026) that the US military has been committing crimes? Please post it or send this evidence to us at thegeofight@protonmail.com. We actively collect evidence every day. From everywhere. Lastly, three attorneys at TheGeofight (including myself) have reviewed 50 USC 1520(a) and have concluded that it does not support the notion that the US government contaminates its citizens in the absence of a declared emergency. Do you have an alternative legal interpretation? We are doing our best to present legitimate concrete legal interpretations and evidence. Feel free to let us know. Thank you. Blake Horwitz