To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand milady. Or low IQ. Just don’t be stuck in the middle

men of myths, those that will be whispered long after their societies’ crumble

Heil Hitler

driving under the speed limit without the intention of turning should be punishable by lethal injection

you thought this was a shitpost, but it was a business plan

The $MOG guys (and the broader 4chan/Milady-adjacent meme coin scene) really did clock something about Hunter Biden years ago that most people missed or dismissed as just edgy trolling. The early $MOG lore $MOG launched in 2023 as a pure meme play on “mogging” — the 4chan slang for dominating/outshining someone (originally looks/status, later evolving into “effortless cosmic domination” or mog/acc). The very first branding that stuck? Hunter Biden with Pit Viper sunglasses, leaning into that raw, unfiltered, crack-era chaotic energy. It wasn’t political signaling. The creators and early community weren’t Biden supporters — they were more in the ironic, anti-establishment, Trump-curious or just pure shitpost lane. The coin itself stayed mostly apolitical. They picked Hunter because the vibe fit the archetype perfectly: a guy who had every reason to fold under the weight of scandals, addiction, family drama, media pile-ons, and legal hell… yet kept moving in his own lane, making art, living (and documenting) his chaos without the usual politician-son PR filter. That “don’t give a shit, I’m doing me” energy is mogging. It’s not about being liked or winning approval — it’s about radiating a kind of unapologetic self-possession that makes the noise bounce off. The meme later evolved into the Joycat (that grinning yellow cat rocking rainbow Pit Vipers), which became the cleaner, more meme-native mascot. But the origin story never fully left. Fast forward to now (June 2026) Hunter is actually mogging on X right now. Hundreds of posts in a few days — sobriety milestone flex, self-deprecating jokes about his past, sharp clapbacks at critics, defending his family, and that unbothered, slightly chaotic humor that’s winning people over (or at least making the timeline entertaining as hell). People are calling it his villain era, but it’s more like peak “I’m not performing for you” energy. He did the long Candace Owens podcast (raw, tears, owning his story). He’s accepting Bitcoin for his art. And the $MOG community is literally circling back — recent posts tagging him, offering custom Pit Viper x MOG sunglasses, and connecting the dots between his old chaotic aura and his current sober-but-still-unfiltered run. It’s full circle and kind of beautiful in a deranged internet way. The same guys who used his image as the original chaotic mascot when he was at his lowest public point are now watching him live out the “stay in your lane, own your narrative, let the haters seethe” philosophy in real time. Why it tracks “Mogging” at its core isn’t about conventional winning or optics. It’s about that internal frequency where external judgment just doesn’t land the same way. Hunter’s whole arc — the laptop era, the trials, the addiction battles, the art, and now this very online, very candid comeback tour — is one long case study in refusing to let the script be written by his enemies or the media. The $MOG bros saw the seed of that years ago when nobody else was framing it that way. They turned it into a coin that grew into something bigger (tech bros, Elon adjacent mog/acc stuff, serious market cap). Hunter, whether he knows it or not, ended up embodying the spirit they were memeing. It’s one of those rare moments where the meme predicted (or at least accurately diagnosed) the man. Crazy how these things work out in the simulation. The Pit Vipers would look good on him now, honestly. Full circle mog. 🫡

Mog predicted this guy being a generational talent back in 2023

Mogged.

Patriotic summer is imminent 😎

WTF timeline are we on. Someone called me the MAGA whisperer and I’ll gladly take the title. Left, right, D or R we all want the same things. We’re being divided on purpose by the Epstein Elite Oligarch class because as long as we’re at each other’s throats, they get fat and rich off of our misery. The second we figure out we agree on more than we disagree, they’re done. Love your neighbor. Be yourself. Radical honesty. No fucks given, no fucks taken. Everything else is just noise. (But still fuck Jake “Brick Tamland” Tapper on any time line)

if I had to look for a job on @LinkedIn I would fucking kill myself

Seeing these movies today, you realize Jews were just projecting what they do to the Palestinians onto the Germans. I can't imagine a German shooting someone for target practice, but we see the IDF do it every day.

All high quality women are disgusted by men into "looksmaxxing" Genetically lower caste men can never truly ascend, because the process of ascension requires them to internalize a permanent external female gaze such that they destroy their own masculinity A natural 8/10 guy never thinks "How can I become more attractive to women?" He simply is There is no need to have ever considered this model of reality. He doesn't need to think about maxillas or mewing or dimorphism or SMV or aura or bonesmashing or dark triad or status or mogging Naturally attractive men can be stupid, careless, unselfaware, have a bad hair day, wear t-shirts from 10 years ago, etc, but attractiveness remains effortlessly intact A large part of that is that he never had to leave his own perspective to become himself, so he retains the erotic innocence of his own masculinity As soon as a man enters a path like "looksmaxxing", they perform a metaphysical self betrayal on themselves It's a strange, distinctly modern surgery, where the man slices himself in 2 by his own hand 1) the part that acts 2) the part that watches the actor The second part isn't any kind of higher spiritual awareness or personal evolution It's a degradation It's the man taking a percentage of his own psyche and turning it female. It's an act of transitioning He becomes his own artificially constructed female observer/spectator, and begins to ask himself continual internal questions from this perspective - how am I being seen? - what's my current level of mogging? - how can I gain clout here? - what's my best angle? - how can XYZ new tactic help? More and more of the man's mind starts to transition to this external, evaluative, artificial judging feminine gaze, until he can't see it any other way As a result, the masculine part of himself is progressively castrated This castration that can be felt by any genuinely feminine and high quality woman Think about what masculinity really is There's an aspect of masculine power that minimizes the gap between impulse and action. The man acts, speaks, takes risk, creates. There's an immediacy, and an innocence in that immediacy. It lacks ongoing contamination by thought or observation He just moves, because he is inwardly compelled to do so, by whatever primal or intuitive forces he is rooted in True masculinity has an unselfconscious centre of action The opposite of this routing everything through constant inner female-perspective self-surveillance and feedback loops The looksmaxxing man develops something like an internal beaurocratic tension. He is always looking for a stamp of approval from the world. He is always trying to be a good little boy and get a golden star from the examiner There's a psychological fracture that happens as a man starts down this path that can seemingly really be recovered from The loss of the pre analytical, pre internally-observed state that is the throne of real masculinity There's a tangible feeling to this. You can sense it. When you encounter a man and it's palpably clear that they're always observing themselves from the outside. Always performing for an imagined audience. Always trying to position themselves optimally, gain clout, be better looking, be more witty, come across a certain way Quality women don't want this. It intuitively disgusts them, even if they don't know why Just think about it. Have you ever seen any truly quality women pursue these men? Or are they mostly just low quality, equally artificial, social media addict, clout chasing party whores you'd never want a child with anyway. Net attention may increase, but quality is low. Look closely and it's obvious A man like this can improve his face, body, wear nice clothes, etc. But to do so, he must optimize himself for a gaze. As he does so, he castrates his own masculinity. He may become optically better looking, but simultaneously much less attractive to the high quality women who actually count for anything

Look at ze Germans, they're chilling harder than even the Scandis. Being a German used to be so nice... 38 hour work week at a semi-state company like Volkswagen where you have to commit crimes to get fired. Pay used to be not THAAT much behind America, and you got better benefits. You didn't need to work hard- your culture made you by default more aryan than most Untermenschs on the planet. You just show up, be competent, and then go home early on Fridays to grill your bratwurst and watch Bundesliga with your neighbour. And Germans also have the best racial slurs BY FAR. Fidschi Kanacke Zigeuner Geldjude Spaghetti Now you can't even say any of these anymore.... The problem is that Germany adopted Untermenschenmentalität, while the Chinese Schlitzaugen fucked them over by doing the same things but cheaper, and the Amischweine with their Geldjuden just monopolise all the internet while dodging taxes. Now the German traum is dead. But that's because the Germans have become weak. Even Hitler said so before he unalived himself. He said the Germans don't deserve glory.

“wHy aRe tHerE iNdiaNs In pOrTuGaL?!” Because they are good slaves, you are not. I hate essay-posting but allow me a rare indulgence: To understand what is happening now, you need understand that this isn’t the first time it’s happened. Why are there Indians in Kenya? Suriname? Fiji? Burma? Because Indians have always been the preferred servile class of elites. The evidence for this goes back hundreds of years. I’ve spoken about British colonial Burma before, and it is a great example of what this looks like. Even after extensive efforts to bring them to heel, the majority of the Burmese ethnic groups were far too resistant to submit to the British empire to be reliable labor. They refused to abandon their culture and ways of life to be slave drones for British pocketbooks. So the Brits started importing Indians to be their colonial administrators, preferring them as labor because they were easier to control and satisfy. By the 1940s, Indians made up almost 20% of the population of the entire country. Another great historical example of this is Suriname - a small country in South America that had been under Dutch colonial rule for 300 years. The Dutch abolished slavery in 1863, forcing colonial plantation owners to have to hire labor to do the work they had previously been using slaves for. But… they didn’t want to pay former slaves or Indigenous locals a living wage for the work. So what did the Dutch elites do instead? Import Indians. Today, Indians still make up 27% of the population. 27%. Of a tiny, obscure South American country. We could basically go through the list of every country with a non-negligible Indian population and the theme would be consistent: They were brought there by elites who needed a submissive, easily exploitable labor pool when local labor asked for better living conditions or wages. Why? Because Indians never did. They are a population that seems fully content with subjugation (even Marx noticed this). So it’s easy to see why they were such an ideal population for the intensive global expansion era of colonial empires. And it’s even easier to see why they are perfect subjects for late capitalism now. They are the culturally, psychologically, and physically ideal organism for the dominant system. There’s 1.4 billion of them. They are deeply socially stratified and so expect and even enjoy inequality. Their cuisine is cheap, meat-free slop. They live amongst trash and filth with no qualms. They don’t care about the environment. Their reaction to death and abuse is blank-eyed indifference. They are physically and spiritually malleable. They not only adopt and internalize the demands of the dominant system as personal ambition, they believe this servitude makes them better than everyone else who hasn’t. Absolutely IDEAL subjects. You, on the other hand, are not the ideal subject. You want to live in a high-trust society. You would shed tears if someone tried to cut down the apple tree you climbed as a child to build a data center. You want to see and experience beauty. You want your own space. You have an expectation that your living conditions will improve over time. You would not be content to live in a room with 10 other people, work 16 hours per day for pennies, and eat cheap slop. You are a liability. Just like the Burmese and Surinamese slaves were. And as we continue to crawl deeper into this late capitalist hellscape, you and your silly little needs will come into increasing conflict with those of the system. Thus, you WILL be replaced by people far easier to control and far less concerned about their own welfare or the welfare of everyone and everything around them. … Unless you do something about it. But the system has already locked-in that you won’t, and that you’ll just sort of fade into nothingness, distracted by meaningless comforts and terrified of the uncertainty of change. So “why are Indians in [wherever]?” Because you are about to not be.

Introducing: MOGGLES 🫵😹 An official @PitViperShades x Mog Coin collab ULTRA RARE. LIMITED RELEASE. 200% MORE MOGGING. pitviper.com/moggles

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com