The Frankist movement has been Vatican adjacent while Sabbateanism (og) was more Islam adjacent (though Frank took a crack at Islam too. Rabbi Shmuley is a cartoon villain of a Jew because he’s a Frankist, who is practicing hermetic inversion on the world stage for Rome.

Germany says it won’t accept UniCredit's €39 billion takeover bid for Commerzbank bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

The only thing which makes the U.S. Imperial Dollar strong these days is a crisis and/or war. The U.S. Dollar Index has gone virtually NOWHERE for decades… it has gone up and down and ended up where it started. Basically a total waste of time. Gold has spent the last decades going up by 10-20 x against the Milkshake dollar. The only joke is here Brent is the dollar’s “performance” My two ounces

The Sun (Sol) represents Gold; therefore, the Green Lion is an alchemical metaphor for gold dissolving in a mixture of nitric and hydrochloric acids called 'aqua regia' (royal water). Green color has always been at the center of alchemical mysteries and consequently represented by the Green Lion. Onward, the green leaves of the plant are formed through the quality of sunlight. The Green Lion here is the green pigment chlorophyll that receives and captures the light. From another perspective, the Green Lion devouring the Sun is an alchemical symbol representing what is probably the effect of the sulphuric acid that has been accumulated for extensive means in the alchemical process. The Sun is also a symbol of consciousness, but more specifically, Gold or the Sun is directly linked with the Spirit. Therefore, for the inner processes of Alchemy, the Green Lion is said to be the phase in which the soul is "dissolved" of any impurities to allow access to the higher Self, to the attainment of a superior state of consciousness, which corresponds with the Philosopher's Stone.

"[...]they drop them down by hand. At the same time they mock them and say that they are oxen, not children." The RED (Edomite) heifer/ox sacrificed for the sanctification of the 3rd Temple obviously corresponds to the josephic/edomite "ox"-sacrifice of the firstborn son as well.

Trump is reportedly considering dismissing several senior officials who opposed the Iran deal, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and CIA Director John Ratcliffe. A senior U.S. official reportedly said, “The argument has been settled. Those who opposed it may pay a personal price.” Source: Israel Hayom

Strait of Hormuz: Iran will likely try to exploit the agreement’s seemingly ambiguous language about the Strait of Hormuz to try to enforce its control over shipping through the strait. The MoU stipulates that Iran “will immediately take steps to ensure that the movement of merchant ships [through the strait] is resumed within 30 days to the pre-war volume,” according to Block, Saudi media, and several Western outlets. Iran is expected to remove “technical obstacles” and naval mines from the strait during the 30-day period. The reported MOU text does not explicitly bar Iran from “managing” the strait, and Iran could therefore continue to insist on vessels using its illegal traffic separation scheme in Iranian territorial waters and paying “fees” to the IRGC Navy. The MoU text also states that the United States and Iran will “respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity” and “refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.” The Iranian regime has repeatedly claimed that it and Oman control the Strait of Hormuz as territorial waters. Iran could also try to argue that its “management” of the strait is an Iranian internal affair. The MoU text also does not mention whether Iran can charge tolls, despite President Trump stating on June 14 that vessels can pass through the strait “toll-free.” Some versions of the agreement published in Western media on June 16 do mention that Iran will not charge tolls for 60 days and that Iran will work with Oman to “define future administration and maritime services” in the strait, however. IRGC-affiliated media stated on June 15 that Iran will pause charging “fees” for 60 days but intends to resume charging “fees” after that period. Iranian officials have consistently claimed that Iran is charging “service fees” as opposed to tolls in the Strait of Hormuz, and therefore that vessels are able to transit through the strait “toll-free.”

Why This Doesn't Deserve the Outrage Either The feeds are on fire over "Trump giving $300 billion to Iran." And I understand the reflex — the number is enormous, the recipient is the designated enemy, and the timing feels obscene. But I'd ask the same thing here that I ask about the Vance appearance: before you reach for the outrage, check whether the thing actually departs from the pattern, or whether it's the pattern doing exactly what it's been doing all along. Because this is the latter. And once you see that, the shock starts to look like a failure to have been watching. Let me separate what's being claimed from what's on the record. First, there is no $300 billion check from the U.S. Treasury. What exists is a draft memorandum of understanding — reported by the New York Times on May 28, not signed — that includes a proposed reconstruction mechanism valued at roughly $300 billion. Tehran had demanded reparations for war damage it estimates somewhere between $300 billion and a trillion. The fund is the negotiated answer to that demand. That's the artifact. Not a transfer. A draft. Second, watch the language, because the language is the tell. The American side deliberately avoided the words "compensation" and "reparations" and chose "international investment fund" instead. That rebrand is the whole political fight in miniature: critics call it reparations or ransom, the administration calls it an investment vehicle, and the same dollar figure carries opposite meanings depending on which word you let frame it. When the packaging is being managed that carefully, the packaging is worth more attention than the outrage usually gives it. Third — and this is the part that should defuse most of the "giving our money to Iran" framing — it isn't U.S. taxpayer money in the administration's own telling. Asked directly whether Iran would have access to a $300 billion fund, Vance said it was "the sort of thing they could have access to, funded by the Gulf coast coalition, so long as they honor their end of the obligation." So the structure being floated is a fund capitalized by Gulf sovereign wealth — Saudi Arabia's PIF, the UAE's ADIA and Mubadala and ADQ, Qatar's QIA — with the United States facilitating, and U.S. firms, including ones tied to the same Witkoff and Kushner real estate interests that floated the idea, positioned to do the rebuilding. The U.S. role is broker and beneficiary, not payer. And here's where the surprise really collapses. This is not a new arrangement. It is the same machine that's been running the entire term. The Gulf sovereign funds collectively manage somewhere around four to six trillion dollars, and the United States has been by far the largest single beneficiary of their outbound investment — more than $120 billion deployed last year alone. That capital has been moving through Trump-network channels specifically: investment vehicles that have strengthened ties to Kushner, Witkoff, and Eric Trump, alongside Trump-allied tech figures like Altman and Musk, and that have helped the Gulf states secure concrete policy wins like export licenses for advanced semiconductor chips. The broader bargain underneath all of it is capital-for-concessions: Gulf money flows toward American priorities — above all the enormous capital appetite of the AI buildout — and American policy flows back the other way. So the Iran fund isn't an aberration. It's an application. Gulf sovereign capital is the financing instrument. U.S. policy concessions — chips, security guarantees, deal facilitation — are the counterparty. And Trump-orbit principals sit at the intermediation layer, where they've sat the whole time. If you weren't outraged by the architecture when it was pointing at chips and AI data centers, the Iran deployment isn't a new sin. It's the same instrument aimed at a new target. The structure was always this. People are only noticing now because "Iran" is a word that triggers the reflex that "sovereign wealth fund" doesn't. I'll keep my own evidentiary discipline here, the same as always. There's a genuine complication that cuts against treating this as a done deal: no money has been committed. Trump himself posted "No money will be exchanged, until further notice," and conditioned everything on Iran's terms — no nuclear weapon, the Strait of Hormuz open with no tolls, the sea mines removed. The deal is unsigned. And the Gulf appetite to actually write these checks is not guaranteed — the war damaged Gulf finances, and as of March those same states were reviewing their commitments, weighing pledge reversals and divestments. "$300 billion funded by the Gulf coalition" is at this point a proposed structure, not committed capital. Even Iran's own hardliners are skeptical; one IRGC-linked figure called it "a lollipop" — a fund without binding guarantees dangled in exchange for reopening Hormuz. So I'm not telling you the deal is good, or that the structure is benign, or that capital-as-foreign-policy is something to wave through. Those are all live questions, and the intermediation layer — where the same private real-estate and tech principals keep turning up at the seam between sovereign money and U.S. policy — is exactly the thing worth watching most closely. That's the real story, and it's a more serious one than the headline. What I'm telling you is that the outrage is aimed at the wrong shape. "Trump is handing Iran $300 billion of our money" compresses a conditional, unsigned, Gulf-financed reconstruction proposal into a direct American cash giveaway. The compression is what generates the heat. And the reason the actual structure doesn't surprise me is the same reason the Vance booking doesn't: the pattern has been in plain view for the entire term. Recognize it, name it, keep your eye on where it goes next — but don't act shocked that the machine ran again. It never stopped running.

The Moscow-Saint Petersburg highway. A massive queue has formed at a gas station. Fuel sale restrictions have been introduced across Russia.