This tweet from
@perrymetzger has only 9.2k views at the time I am quoting it and yet it succinctly captures one of the most important and defining moments in AI. Anthropic will advance their own ball, request regulatory capture, and actively prevent AI development. ๐คฏ
I have seen some people claim, completely incorrectly, that Anthropicโs new โsilent sabotageโ policy is just trying to stop distillation attacks that steal weights from their models. This paragraph makes it extremely clear that that is not the case. Anthropic is generally blocking attempts to advance the state of the art in AI research, even for techniques they themselves make no use of.
For example, Anthropic is targeting research on distributed training, which is to say, training runs done on large pools of computers loosely attached over the Internet, but it does not do any distributed training, as it has no need for it. Distributed training is, however, a technique that open source AI researchers without billions of dollars at their disposal have been leaning on to allow them to leverage large amounts of crowdsourced computation.
Why would Anthropic do this? Likely because they fear that their model might help people write code to build open source AI systems trained without expensive hardware, and because to the EA cult, distributed open source AI training systems are the worst possible thing someone could build.
It is perfectly within Anthropicโs right as a company to do stuff like this, but it is also within our right, as users of AI systems, to stop giving them money.
It is perfectly within Anthropic right to lobby to try to gain a government monopoly on AI research and development, as they have for years now. It is perfectly within our rights, as citizens, to oppose repugnant attempts to grab power with all our strength.