It is strikingly different what having a full bias vs slightly more diversity of thought looks like on national television.
I just finished watching media coverage of MP Jenerouxās resignation and here were their key points and takeaway:
CTV Power Play (approx 11 min segment):
1ļøā£ how good of a man Janeroux is. How many panelists (con and lib) knew him and respect him.
2ļøā£ there may be more to the story, but they were hesitant to make comments on it because they donāt know.
3ļøā£ discussed his family and wifeās career and how hard it must be to travel back and fourth.
4ļøā£ the biggest national conversation right now is this budgetāto the point where the host even apologized for bringing up Janerouxās departureābut obviously itās the news cycle so she had to talk about it.
CBC Power & Politics (approx 36 min segment):
1ļøā£ conservatives treated him horribly and were threatening him āthatās no way to treat a colleagueā,
2ļøā£ He clearly disagrees with Pierre Poilievreās leadership style. He made no mention of his praise of Poilievre in his statementāso thatās proof he obviously disagreesāāhis choice was, Iām not gonna cross the floor because Iām unhappy with the leadership of Poilievre (because Iāve been threatened), and I canāt stay in this caucus because of how Iāve been treated. So I have to resignā
3ļøā£ Pierreās leadership doesnāt work. He lost the election he was supposed to win. He lost his seat in Ottawa which was easy to win.
4ļøā£ Poilievre is 20 points behind Carney in terms of popularity āpeople donāt like Poilievre. He has no allies. People donāt like Poilievreāand heās not making it easy for people to like himā and then all laughed about the struggles Poilievre is having.
Why do our tax dollars pay for this? How is this acceptable?