I had to explain the @cursor_ai lady that I misinterpreted the billing report and spent over $1k playing with Cursor Cloud agents because it was fun watching them troubleshoot GUI issues. Fun and expensive. "included" in the gui billing doesn't mean included in sub anymore

I'm sure the next grok-composer-origin-cursor-69 will be greate

Why is the Codex SDK log size cap 1mb? It breaks AWS logs, for example. A rather strange default

BREAKING: GLM-5.2 is now 1st on Design Arena. With an Elo of 1360, GLM-5.2 has jumped ahead of the now unavailable Claude Fable 5. And it's open weights. This is an improvement of 4 positions and 27 Elo points to achieve one of the highest Elo scores in our code categories since Design Arena started. Huge congratulations to the @Zai_org on the release!

Claude code has put codex in a sandbox (while letting itself run unrestricted) and thought I wouldn't notice. I guess Dario's tricks are well alive inside of it

I asked Codex to extend my Claude code in the box to be dual-purpose and run Codex if needed. It failed Claude Code actually seems to be making progress in adding codex In a sense, Codex failed to propagate itself, while Claude Code is dying from suicidal empathy

Trading isn't rocket science

Announcing Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1: a shift toward agentic workloads, featuring upgraded benchmarks and new per-task metrics The Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is our synthesis metric for assessing model intelligence and tracking AI progress. v4.1 marks a broader shift toward agentic workloads, with three main changes: Updated and reweighted evaluations toward agentic tasks: 1. We upgraded three evaluations, removed one, and reweighted the Intelligence Index: ➤ Upgraded Terminal-Bench Hard to Terminal-Bench 2.1 and τ²-Bench Telecom to τ³-Bench Banking. Both move to newer, more robust task sets with harder, more realistic agentic scenarios that better separate frontier models ➤ Upgraded GDPval-AA to GDPval-AA v2. The upgrade re-baselines Elo to human performance at 1000, introduces a rotating panel of frontier-model judges, and raises the turn limit from 100 to 250 for longer-horizon agent trajectories ➤ Removed IFBench due to saturation. The benchmark no longer distinguishes frontier models sufficiently, so we have removed it from the Intelligence Index. We will continue to run it and publish results on new model releases 2. Cost per Task, Time per Task, and Tokens per Task: Three new per-task metrics, reported for every model and based on the Intelligence Index. We take the total cost, total time, and total output tokens for a model to run the Intelligence Index and divide by the number of tasks across its evaluations, giving the average cost, time, and output tokens to complete a single Intelligence Index task 3. Cached input token reporting: We now report cached input tokens and their impact on cost, including the cost to run the Intelligence Index, to better reflect the real cost of running each model Key Results: ➤ Leading models: Claude Fable 5 (with Opus 4.8 fallback, 60) leads the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 by four points but is currently unavailable, leaving Claude Opus 4.8 (max, 56) as the most intelligent available model, ahead of GPT-5.5 (xhigh, 55) ➤ Open weights leading models: Among open weights models, DeepSeek V4 Pro (max, 44) and MiniMax M3 (44) lead, followed by Kimi K2.6 (43) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (42) ➤Cost per Task: Claude Opus 4.8 (max) is the most expensive available model at $1.78 per task, with Claude Fable 5 the highest overall at $3.25. GPT-5.5 (xhigh) scores within a point of Opus 4.8 on the Intelligence Index at $0.99 per task. DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) stands out on the Intelligence vs Cost per Task chart at $0.04 per task, with other leading proprietary models costing 20x to 45x more ➤Time per Task: time per task (inference decode time) ranges from 1.5 minutes for Grok 4.3 (high) to 13.5 for Claude Sonnet 4.6 (max), a roughly 9x spread. Claude Opus 4.8 (max) completes a task in 6.4 minutes and GPT-5.5 (xhigh) in 3.7, while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview stands out on the Intelligence vs Time per Task chart at 1.6 minutes for a score of 46

bellatores laboratores oratores

If green parties are just undercover commies pivoting to degrowth, are all those studies about "eat red meat bad" also a part of some funny plot?

Alright, Fable, you earned $1.41. Just $598.59, and you are good to go

My wife kept increasing my burger size repeatedly during the weekend It started with a quarter-pounder and gradually grew to a half-pounder I'd say with no fries or anything, that is the right size

Dario gets a call from the White House

I actually managed to write one book with Fable before it got shut off Claude Code said it cost more than $600 (no idea how much, resume doesn't sum numbers) Will it actually translate into sales numbers? I really doubt But if it will, it will be the real mark of intelligence

The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…

want to point out a few really interesting things here 1. Claude Code is actually the worst performing harness when using the same model, significantly behind opencode and cursor cli this is the core reason i've been against the LLM companies focusing their business on locking people into their harness what they are good at is making great models. they suck at making good harness products, just like how power plants won't make the best dishwashers, and how internet providers won't make the best phones if anthropic wants to do what's best for their users, they should let people use their subscriptions in whatever harness they choose, not locked into claude code alone 2. fable 5 max is only 1pt above gpt 5.5 xhigh (77 vs 76) this matches my experience so far - fable 5 does have the big model smell and it's pretty good, but it's not a massive jump forward like their marketing suggested, at least not on building software this is actually alarming for anthropic because it's very unlikely people will want to pay 2x higher cost for the 1pt difference. my speculation would be that in enterprises people will be restricted to adopt fable & mythos only on some mission critical tasks, not used at scale

Why doesn't Claude's code resume restore the spent token amount? How do I know how much the whole thing consumed if it is reset upon closing the window?

In Dorohedoro season 2, there is this subplot of crosseyes being total bums, working the lamest jobs, stealing coins from vending machines It is the funniest shit ever Like an off-brand Gintama episode

*trillioniare

Got almost fired because the big boss received a bunch of 5XX from Anthropic today Dario, I'm migrating to Codex. You will regret it!