As a founder, I’ve spent years building institutional grade Bitcoin, and AI infrastructure. I’m one of very few female founders in this niche globally, but you wouldn’t know it from reading Forbes . This week they gave the cover story to an escort servicing Silicon Valley’s AI engineers, filing it under
#Tech, giving it the photo shoot, the distribution, the cultural weight. That editorial choice says something specific about what kind of woman in tech is considered worth the spotlight.
Here’s what troubles me about the framing. The woman profiled is described as “intelligent, well-read, conversant in AI and crypto and biohacking.” She studied, built skills, and the story Forbes chose to tell is that she used all of that to service the men building the industry rather than building alongside them. Female founders currently receive roughly 2% of global venture funding. Women are close to half the global population. In the UAE alone, 64% of university graduates are women. So what exactly are we telling those women, and the girls watching them, about where their intelligence and ambition are supposed to lead?
Unfortunately, what nobody talks about honestly, is what happens to the technology itself when women aren’t in the room as founders and decision-makers. Facial recognition systems that perform significantly worse on women and people of color were built without adequate female representation in the teams designing them. AI hiring tools trained on historical data have systematically downgraded applications from women. These are not hypothetical risks, but are documented systemic failures that exist, because the people building the systems didn’t reflect the full range of people those systems would affect. That’s the real cost of this pipeline problem, and it compounds every year we celebrate the wrong stories.
I want to be clear: this is not about the woman profiled. Her choices are her own, and that’s not the conversation. The real conversation is about what Forbes chose to amplify, and what that choice signals to every girl right now deciding whether a career in technology is worth the fight. If the message is that the realistic path for women to break through in AI is to monetize proximity to male founders rather than become one, then the industry will keep looking exactly like it does today.
That’s not inevitable, but a choice, and media is part of making it.