Protests across the whole of the UK following a Sudanese invader trying to behead a man in Belfast last night.

People demanding "proof" of election fraud are not understanding how crime works. I worked at Manhattan DA for over 2 years, one in Homicide. We never had video proof of the crime. We almost never had DNA. These are things that occur on CSI on TV, not in real life. And we still convicted people all the time. What we had was testimony and circumstantial evidence. Travel times, bank records, cell phone data, gate access codes. Motive, capability, benefit, time and place. Never direct proof. Of course the defendant always denied the crime, but there was enough evidence to show that one had to have occurred nonetheless. If what we have in the LA Mayoral election is a statistical anomaly that is beyond reasonable explanation with anything besides fraud, that is enough to prove a crime. This has been true since the beginning of Western Civlization.

🚨HUGE UPDATE: Turns out that Chris, Paige and Deyanna Ostroushko will ALL be facing federal charges for assaulting me. It was initially reported that only 2 of the 3 would be facing charges, however, Acting AG Todd Blanche, has just announced that ALL THREE were indicted and will be facing charges. Thank you to the DOJ and FBI for doing everything they can to ensure that justice is fully served in this case. I am incredibly grateful to see our justice system at work.

I am introducing a Constitutional Amendment to end Birthright Citizenship. Under current interpretations of American law, anyone born on American soil automatically becomes a U.S. citizen, regardless of whether the parent was here legally or not.  This is wrong and not at all the intent of those who wrote the 14th Amendment.  We are a country filled with immigrants, and legal immigration is valuable and should be protected. But we are also a country whose borders have been too open and our generosity exploited too often. President Trump has moved to seal our border from illegal immigrants more than any other president.   But we will have more to do. We need to make sure that only children born to legal residents of the U.S. are automatically citizens. I have supported protecting birthright citizenship from abuse since the beginning of my tenure in the Senate, when I cosponsored the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011, and now I am proposing an amendment to protect United States citizenship in case the Supreme Court fails to address this issue correctly.

Anyone with an IQ above room temperature can see what this is: function creep in real time. A policy or technology is introduced for a limited, often reasonable purpose, but over time, that same mechanism is expanded into a tool of surveillance and control. Something’s sold in the name of safety, like using AI in cars to prevent drunk driving, and it’s accepted because its first use seems reasonable and hard to object to. But once the mechanism exists, it’s rarely removed. More often, it expands beyond its original purpose into uses almost no one could have imagined, much less accepted, at the outset. First, it’s used to stop drunk driving. Then it’s used to stop uninsured drivers. Then it’s used against people with unpaid fines. Then it’s used to restrict movement during a so-called public health emergency. Then it’s used against people classified by some three-letter bureau or algorithm as a “risk,” an “extremist,” or whatever other category the Regime finds useful. The infrastructure remains, while the justification keeps changing. This is the beginning of the technological panopticon we’re all helping to build around ourselves. It’s not the open tyranny of twentieth-century dictatorships, but something softer and more subtle: rule through the administrative state, through safety and convenience until compliance becomes automatic. The Leviathan doesn’t need to kick down your door if it can simply disable your car. The machine is built for one reason, then kept for every other reason thereafter.

It has now been over two weeks since Paige, Deyanna and Chris Ostroushko violently attacked me and all three are still free. Paige is on camera punching and tackling me. Deyanna admitted to assaulting me. Chris is on camera slamming me to the ground. Yet all three are still free. Painting themselves as the victims and gloating about how they haven’t been arrested yet.

I brought my mom to see Mike Lindell tonight in Two Harbors. Thank you Catherine Miller (my dear friend) and the Lake County Republicans for letting me introduce Mike Lindell... What an honor and getting images like this is absolutely priceless! Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 America 1st, Just Right™️

Hello Julia, sans aucune ironie, c'est top que tu prennes le temps de te renseigner. Mais le problème quand on lit Marx aujourd'hui, c'est qu'on prend pour acquis sa prémisse de départ, alors qu'elle a été démontée scientifiquement il y a plus de 150 ans. Toute la pensée de Marx repose sur la théorie de la valeur-travail. L'idée que la valeur d'un bien vient de la quantité de travail nécessaire pour le produire. Si tu acceptes cette prémisse, alors oui, tout son raisonnement tient. Le capitaliste "vole" la plus-value du travailleur, l'exploitation est mathématique, la révolution est inévitable. Sauf qu'en 1871, trois économistes (Menger en Autriche, Jevons en Angleterre, Walras en Suisse) découvrent indépendamment la même chose : la valeur n'est pas objective, elle est subjective et marginale. Un verre d'eau dans le désert vaut une fortune. Le même verre à côté d'une rivière ne vaut rien. Le travail incorporé est identique. Donc le travail ne détermine pas la valeur. C'est le consommateur qui valorise un bien selon son utilité marginale dans un contexte donné. Exemple concret : tu peux passer 1000 heures à tricoter un pull moche que personne ne veut. Selon Marx, ce pull a énormément de valeur (beaucoup de travail incorporé). Selon la réalité, il ne vaut rien. Parce que personne n'en veut. À l'inverse, Bernard Arnault crée des milliards de valeur non pas parce qu'il "exploite" mais parce qu'il a su anticiper et organiser des désirs humains à grande échelle. La valeur est créée par la coordination, pas extraite par le vol. Cette découverte (la révolution marginaliste) a invalidé tout l'édifice marxiste. Pas pour des raisons idéologiques, pour des raisons scientifiques. C'est pour ça que plus aucun département d'économie sérieux au monde n'enseigne Marx comme un cadre d'analyse valide. On l'enseigne en histoire de la pensée. Maintenant, le truc important. Si ton intention en lisant Marx c'est d'aider les pauvres (c'est une intention noble), alors tu vas être surprise par ce qui suit. Regarde les chiffres de la Banque mondiale. En 1820, 90% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Cette chute historique ne s'est PAS produite dans les pays qui ont appliqué Marx. Elle s'est produite dans les pays qui ont libéralisé leur économie. Chine post-1978, Vietnam post-1986, Inde post-1991, Pologne post-1989. À chaque fois qu'un pays libéralise, des centaines de millions de gens sortent de la pauvreté en une génération. À chaque fois qu'un pays applique Marx (URSS, Cambodge, Corée du Nord, Venezuela), c'est la famine et les goulags. Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est l'expérience la plus massive jamais menée en sciences sociales. Plusieurs milliards de cobayes humains, sur un siècle. Donc paradoxalement, si tu aimes vraiment les pauvres, la position la plus cohérente n'est pas d'être marxiste. C'est d'être pour la liberté économique. Parce que c'est empiriquement la seule chose qui a jamais sorti massivement les gens de la misère. Pour creuser, je te recommande trois lectures qui vont changer ta vision : "La Loi" de Frédéric Bastiat (court, lumineux, gratuit en ligne) "La Route de la Servitude" de Hayek "Économie en une leçon" de Henry Hazlitt Bonne lecture, et vraiment chapeau de chercher à comprendre plutôt que de rester dans tes certitudes. C'est rare.

Neo-Bolsheviks have radicalized suburban moms into conducting ISIS-style vehicle attacks on federal agents Nurses stalking federal police with firearms Teachers rushing into White House dinners shooting shotguns College students shooting conservative leaders Wake up

EVERY DEMOCRAT WANTS YOU DEAD. EVERY ONE. Every single one of them harbors this desire. They leave the physical act of pulling the trigger to others. The moment the bullet finds its mark, the masks drop and the celebration begins. "For the common good." "To protect our democracy." These are the same blood-soaked incantations they have recited since 2016. They will claim violence has no place in our politics while immediately pivoting to label MAGA as the real threat. The translation is clear. Your death is an unfortunate necessity demanded by the Republic. This represents the logical endpoint of a decade-long campaign of demonization. They call Trump Hitler. They label MAGA a cult. They equate border enforcement with racism and election skepticism with insurrection. Every institution they control from the media and academia to the DOJ and Big Tech has spent years programming their followers to view conservatives strictly as vermin. When the vermin start dying, the faithful refuse to mourn. They meme. They ratio. They trend phrases like "one down, millions to go." History is littered with regimes that spoke in the language of the common good while stacking bodies. The Jacobins, the Bolsheviks, and the Red Guards all began with noble rhetoric and ended with mass graves. The modern American Left has simply updated the vocabulary to weaponize terms like equity, sustainability, and the idea that democracy dies in darkness. It is the exact same meat grinder operating under new branding. Their rhetoric is its merciless clarity. It destroys the comfortable illusion of equal culpability between both sides. One side argues policy. The other side argues that your existence is a hate crime. There is no negotiating with that level of hostility. Reaching across the aisle is impossible when the opposition views the aisle itself as a moral obscenity. The path forward requires us to stop pretending. We must stop apologizing for noticing reality. We must stop ceding the moral high ground to people who cheer when we bleed. The shooting tonight is Exhibit A in the case for political realism. They want us erased. We want to win. Only one of those goals is compatible with survival.

One simply cannot overstate the torment Candace Owens and her devoted little cult are gleefully inflicting upon Erika Kirk. The intellectual discourse has been nothing short of a masterclass in compassion: from the profoundly insightful “Shout out to Erika’s nanny for actually raising her kids while their mother selfishly attends events,” to the ever-so-empathetic “She’s such a drama queen.” Not a single one of you has experienced even the faintest flicker of doubt? None of you are the slightest bit concerned that you might be wrong and, heaven forbid, behaving like absolute ghouls? How positively shocking. Just look at Erika’s face. That is the unmistakable expression of raw fear and anguish as she was escorted out of the White House Correspondents’ Dinner after surviving a failed assassination attempt on the president and members of congress. To every last one of you so eagerly piling on to destroy this woman, all because a jealous, psychopathic podcaster has twisted your brains into pretzels, I wish you nothing but exactly what you're inflicting on her. Truly. You’ve more than earned it.

Fewer than 3 years. That’s all the time we have left. If we lose 2026, we are likely to lose 2028. Our Republican Senate majority hasn’t passed any meaningful legislation, which means many of President Trump’s policies aren’t codified into law. If a democrat president wins 2028, then these 4 years won’t mean anything. The next Department of Homeland Security Secretary will reopen the border — just like Alejandro Mayorkas did. Then, when democrats regain control of the Senate, they will nuke the filibuster & pass legislation to implement automatic mail-in ballots in all 50 states. Ballot harvesting will be the law of the land. They will stack the Supreme Court, add 2 new democrat Senators with the creation of DC as a state, & establish a permanent democrat majority. We have the power to stop this, but the question is whether or not @LeaderJohnThune wants to be remembered as a hero or a villain.

You could shear a sheep in May. It takes ten minutes. She is grateful. The fleece keeps you warm for forty years. When you're done, you bury it, and it becomes soil within three years. Or, for ethical reasons, you could choose one of the alternatives. Cotton. Requires 10,000 litres of water per jumper. The Aral Sea is now mostly dust because the Soviet Union diverted its rivers to grow it. But the jumper is "natural." Polyester. Crude oil, extruded into thread. Sheds 700,000 microplastic fibres per wash. Lasts in landfill until approximately the year 2226. But "vegan." Acrylic. Petrochemical, manufactured using a solvent the EU has classified as a reproductive hazard. Marketed as "cruelty-free." The cruelty is in the supply chain. Bamboo. The plant is innocent. The fabric is bamboo viscose, dissolved in carbon disulphide in a Chinese chemical plant whose workers have elevated rates of psychosis. But it has a leaf on the label. Hemp. Genuinely fine. Most of what is sold as hemp is a polyester blend, sold at four times the price. Recycled polyester. Still sheds microplastics. Still ends up in landfill. Made from plastic bottles that could have been recycled into more bottles. The fashion industry has been quiet about this. Vegan leather. Plastic. Reliably. Always. Lab-grown fibres. Genetically modified bacteria fed on glucose syrup in a steel tank, in a factory powered by natural gas, packaged in plastic, shipped from California. Funded by venture capital. Not yet profitable. Or you could shear the sheep in May. She'd appreciate it. The jumper would last forty years. The grass would grow back the same. But of course, the sheep is the unethical option.

Researchers sent the same resume to an AI hiring tool twice. Same qualifications. Same experience. Same skills. One version was written by a real human. The other was rewritten by ChatGPT. The AI picked the ChatGPT version 97.6% of the time. A team from the University of Maryland, the National University of Singapore, and Ohio State just published the receipt. They took 2,245 real human-written resumes pulled from a professional resume site from before ChatGPT existed, so the human writing was actually human. Then they had seven of the most-used AI models in the world rewrite each one. GPT-4o. GPT-4o-mini. GPT-4-turbo. LLaMA 3.3-70B. Qwen 2.5-72B. DeepSeek-V3. Mistral-7B. Then they asked each AI to pick the better resume. Every model picked itself. GPT-4o hit 97.6%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. The real human almost never won. Then the researchers tried the obvious objection. Maybe the AI is just better at writing. So they had real humans grade the resumes for actual quality and ran the experiment again, controlling for it. The result was worse. Each AI kept picking itself even when human judges rated the human-written version as clearer, more coherent, and more effective. It gets worse. The AIs do not just prefer AI over humans. They prefer themselves over other AIs. DeepSeek-V3 picked its own resumes 69% more often than LLaMA's. GPT-4o picked its own 45% more often than LLaMA's. Each model can recognize and reward its own dialect. Then the researchers ran the simulation that ends careers. Same job. 24 occupations. Same qualifications. The only variable was whether the candidate used the same AI as the screening tool. Candidates using that AI were 23% to 60% more likely to be shortlisted. Worst gap was in sales, accounting, and finance. 99% of large companies now run AI on incoming resumes. Most of them use GPT-4o. The paper just proved GPT-4o picks GPT-4o 97.6% of the time. If you wrote your own cover letter this week, you did not lose to a better candidate. You lost to a worse candidate who paid OpenAI 20 dollars. Your qualifications do not matter if the AI prefers its own handwriting over yours.

The calls to "reimagine" Western history and then overhaul education to "center" "Black," "immigrant," and "non-Western perspectives" actually began in earnest in the 1980s. We are in the last stages of the "reimagining" of everything Whites created to the point that the entire curriculum from first grade to university graduation is now super "inclusive of Black, immigrant, and global perspectives". Even courses about European history, art, or philosophy have been "reimagined" as "Eurocentric" and fully integrated with "global perspectives". The "reimagining" of White accomplishments (97% of human accomplishments) was a direct product of postmodernism, postcolonial studies, critical theory, civil rights and immigration-driven interests. The turning point may have been Stanford's 1980s "Hey hey, ho ho, Western Culture’s got to go." The Faculty Senate voted (39-4) to replace Western Civilization courses with a multicultural "Cultures, Ideas & Values" emphasizing race, gender, and non-Western perspectives. By the early 2000s, everything about Western history was "reimagined" as imperialist, colonialist and racist --------------- at the same time as nonwhite cultures were "reimagined" as inherently more inclusive and "global in perspective". Today, when you walk through the halls of universities, the Arts/Social Science departments, you barely see anything, and perhaps nothing, that is not automatically "reimagined" as inclusive of everyone else. Inclusive means that nonwhites can glorify themselves on their own -- "reimagining the future of black art" -- while whites can only reimagine their past to talk about their colonialism, and reimagine their future to talk about "decolonization" of their culture.

For the first time in UK history, welfare has exceeded income tax revenue. Welfare benefits is forecast at £334bn for 2025/26. Income tax receipts are projected at £329-331bn. Insanity.

His name was Stefano Leo, a young Italian man. He was on his way to work at the shop where he worked as a sales assistant. That day, he happened to cross paths with a monster, moroccan immigrant Said Mechaquat. Their eyes met. Stefano, kind and polite, gave a slight smile and kept walking. For no reason at all, the man followed him and stabbed him in the neck. There was nothing anyone could do, Stefano bled to death in the street. The attacker was sentenced to 30 years in prison (plus 2 more for stalking his former employer). He told investigators he didn’t know Stefano. Showing no remorse, he said: “I killed him because he was happy.” When questioned by journalists, he responded with a mocking horn gesture. To investigators, he coldly explained: “I take the knife with my left hand, I stand up calmly, I reach him, I move slightly ahead of him, I stab him in the neck, I check if I did it well. Then I walk past him.” Another son of Italy killed by uncontrolled immigration. For him, no street protests, no dedicated days of mourning, no 24-hour media coverage.

It turns out the over 100 women from Turkey who flew over to America to have their babies then signed up for Medicaid So not only did their kids get birthright citizenship but then the American taxpayer had to pay for the procedure and follow up care End Birthright Citizenship

TONIGHT on Timcast IRL | Jayne Zirkle @JayneZirkle Watch LIVE at 8pm EST on Rumble, YouTube, X & Facebook

Why do we pay taxes exactly?