Rogue police push over the elderly mother of Rhiannon Whyte who was stabbed to death by a migrant. The Vichy copper did this whilst Antifa were chanting "Rhiannon Whyte deserved it!" What does identikit Chief Constable Jo Shiner of @sussex_police have to say about this outrage?

Love the idea of keeping kids off social, but let’s not pretend you’re doing this to protect children’s safety. Mass government surveillance. More monitoring. Digital ID. Control. Why should Americans care? Because if we don’t safeguard our rights, that will happen here as well. Save 40% on Ground News using groundnews.com/becky #groundnewspartner

Who the hell does Starmer think he is? I was a member of social media site Gab.com last year when Starmer DEMANDED that Gab C.E.O had over ALL PERSONAL DETAILS of their British members! The C.E.O. posted the highly intimidating letter he received from Starmer, which demanded the details, OR ELSE! The very next day UK members found their access to the site blocked. Most people just think Starmer is awful. He is not. He is acting like he has the powers of a king & this makes him dangerous. We MUST get Starmer out before the damage he is doing to our country, becomes unrepairable!

🚨 West Hertfordshire NHS Trust has signed off almost £487,000 on translation services. And it raises a simple question: Why? The NHS spends over £100,000 every single day on translation services across the country. But almost everyone has a device in their pocket capable of translating for free. And if a Brit travels abroad and needs medical treatment, they are generally expected to pay for their own translation needs. So why are British taxpayers funding tens of millions of pounds a year on services that modern technology can provide for free? At a time when patients cannot get appointments, waiting lists remain huge and NHS finances are under pressure, surely there are better places to spend the money. *Exclusively revealed on The Mike Graham show this morning. @Iromg

"For Miliband, net zero is not merely an environmental policy. It is the organising principle around which Britain’s future should be built. He sees decarbonisation as an economic, industrial, energy security and national security strategy," says Adam Smith, contemplating Miliband as Chancellor under Burnham and warning "Taxation would not be the defining feature of a Miliband Treasury though. This would be the relentless prioritisation of net zero." #CostOfNetZero

🥇British workers first: Reform’s new policy would make it cheaper to hire Brits and more expensive to import labour. @reformparty_uk

ATERRADOR: La policía británica le dice a un ciudadano que baje la bandera israelí porque el musulmán que sostiene una bandera palestina se siente ofendido por el símbolo judío. Londres ya no es un lugar seguro para los no musulmanes.

Thousands of brave Iranian patriots and others are booing the terrorist regime’s anthem at today’s Iran vs New Zealand match. The IRGC tried to silence us. FIFA tried to silence us. The world tried to silence us. We will never be silent. Free Iran! Javid Shah!

I proudly carried the real Iranian flag, the historic Lion and Sun, into the stadium in Los Angeles despite FIFA’s ban. No ideological flag can take the place of our Lion and Sun. @FIFAcom @FIFAWorldCup

This Iranian fan speaks out after FIFA officials took away several flags inside the stadium yesterday. She says fans were told they would be removed from the stadium if they refused to hand them over.

The Lion & Sun was Iran’s national symbol for centuries and appeared on Iran's flag long before the establishment of the Islamic Republic. During the latest nationwide uprising in January, it became the most recognizable symbol carried by protesters and supporters. This World Cup, FIFA classified the Lion & Sun as a political symbol and prohibited it inside stadiums. The response from Iranians was simple: they would make sure it remained visible.

🚨 Incredibly, it has been revealed that the French authorities are dishing out life jackets to illegal migrants, encouraging them to land in Britain. If this were a “rescue”, they would take them back to France. Some of the illegals are now making journeys of 22 hours to get to Britain. France is gladly pushing them to come here. Why wouldn’t they?  Less money they have to spend on welfare. The even more outrageous part is the Tory and Labour governments have paid France £700 million of YOUR money to “stop the boats”. They’re spending that money on tools to help them break into Britain. This is the most humiliating betrayal of our sovereignty imaginable Reform will end this humiliation, secure our border and deport all illegal migrants in Britain.

SWEDEN JUST DREW THE LINE Sweden is doing it. Finally. Parliament has just passed a law that lets the state revoke residence permits for bad behavior. And here is the part that matters - the behavior does not have to be criminal. Undeclared work. Unpaid debts. Tax evasion. Benefit fraud. Links to extremist organizations. That is enough. The law does not only cover new applications. It covers permits already granted. Retroactively. The principle is simple, and it should never have been controversial: a residence permit is a privilege, not a right. Anyone who lives off a society’s hospitality while working against that society’s laws and values has NO automatic claim to stay. Sweden has paid a high price to learn this. Now they are acting. The rest of Europe and the West should take note. Let’s go!🪽❤️‍🔥✝️

Sir John, with respect, the question answers itself, but not in the way the government would like. You have asked why arrivals are not being systematically debriefed to identify the gangs. The government's answer is that smashing the gangs is the priority. Those two positions cannot both be true. But there is a more fundamental question beneath yours. Who is actually driving this? Peter Mandelson admitted in 2013 that in 2004, under a Labour government, Britain was "sending out search parties" for migrants while publicly promising controlled immigration. Andrew Neather, who wrote the 2000 speech that opened Britain's borders, admitted the policy was designed to "rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date." Professor Alan Manning, former head of the government's own Migration Advisory Committee, admitted mass migration was used as a substitute for economic reform the public never voted for. These are not allegations. They are admissions, on the record, by people inside the system. Hungary processed 47 asylum applications in the first six months of this year. The United States reduced border crossings from 1.6 million to under 240,000 within months of a government deciding to act. Britain, holding identical legal powers and international obligations, processed roughly 50,000 in the same period as Hungary's 47. The difference is not capacity. It is not the gangs. It is political will. The government spends £662 million paying France to prevent crossings that continue to break records. It has announced £40,000 payments to persuade failed claimants to leave voluntarily. The removal rate for illegal arrivals stands at four percent. At every decision point, the path away from enforcement has been chosen, consistently, across governments of both parties, across three decades. Your question in the Lords assumes the government wants to smash the gangs and is simply failing to use the tools available. The evidence suggests a different reading. A government that genuinely wanted to close the route would debrief every arrival as a matter of course, use the intelligence to dismantle the networks, and remove those with no right to stay. None of that is happening. What is happening is the performance of enforcement, raids announced, partnerships signed, slogans repeated, while the numbers continue and the removal rate stays near zero. The gangs are the stated enemy. The border is the actual policy choice. And a government that has spent thirty years making that choice has every reason not to ask the questions whose answers would make it impossible to sustain.

🚨UK’s Muslim Rape Epidemic Exposed: “No Age Limit in Sharia” Another Muhammed in Britain caught trying to rape British children. His defense? “There is no age limit in Sharia law. I don’t know UK rules.” This is not one bad apple. It’s 7th-century Muslim culture clashing with civilized Britain. Decades of grooming gangs prove it: Pakistani Muslim men targeting vulnerable white girls, excusing child rape with Islamic teachings that treat non-Muslim kids as fair game. Britain must wake up—deport these incompatible invaders before more children pay the price. Sharia has no place here. Protect British kids now!