.@Keir_Starmer, your statement says you have absolutely no tolerance for abhorrent scenes of violence like this on our streets. With respect, tolerance is not the issue. Nobody tolerates a near beheading on a residential street in Belfast. The question your statement carefully avoids is prevention. And prevention requires honesty about a pattern your government has consistently refused to name. A man in his thirties, a Somali national, pinned a man to the ground on a residential street and stabbed him repeatedly in the face and neck. Members of the public intervened with a hurling stick. A woman required hospital treatment for the stress of witnessing it. This happened in Northern Ireland, a place that has known more than its share of violence, and even there residents said they had never seen anything like it. Your government has presided over record small boat crossings. It has failed to proscribe the IRGC despite repeated promises. It has blocked the grooming gang inquiry for a year before being forced to concede it. It has spent £10 billion on asylum accommodation contracts. It has actively resisted measures that would have reduced the number of unvetted individuals entering and remaining in this country. The victims of these attacks are not statistics. They are British people, going about their lives on their own streets, who were failed before the attack happened. Failed at the border. Failed by a system that prioritises the rights of those who arrive illegally over the safety of those who were already here. Your thoughts are with the victim. So are ours. The difference is that thoughts are not policy. Thoughts do not secure borders. Thoughts do not remove individuals with no right to be here. Thoughts do not protect the next victim, whose name we do not yet know, on a street we cannot yet identify, from an attack that has not yet happened. How many more before the thoughts become action?

Fucking nazis, the lot of you. The 'Palestinians' have repeatedly rejected a 2 state solution, preferring dead Jews.

But you'll tolerate their gangrapes, if doing so gets you extra votes.

In less than 150 seconds, this video completely exposes the entire "Free Palestine" Nazi movement. This must go viral.

Aww the pathetic misogynistic cunt blocked me. They hate people who defend womens rights.

ATERRADOR: Tres inmigrantes ilegales han sido declarados culpables de violar en grupo a una mujer británica en una playa de Brighton. La violaron brutalmente mientras la grababan y la insultaban llamándola "puta". En un momento dado, uno de los violadores la agarró de la cara, le abrió la boca a la fuerza y ​​le escupió, incitando a sus amigos a hacer lo mismo. La víctima declaró: "Les suplicaba que pararan, pero no lo hacían. Cada vez que cierro los ojos, los veo riéndose de mí. Les parecía gracioso. Se me eriza la piel por lo que me hicieron. Son malvados y me han arruinado la vida". Puede que nunca se recupere de este trauma. Esto es lo que el gobierno británico les ha hecho a las mujeres de este país. Es necesario que se rindan cuentas. Vía @NiohBerg

When Naming the Attacker's Community Becomes a Sackable Offence On October 2nd 2025 an Islamist killer named Jihad Al-Shamie attacked a synagogue in Manchester. The following day West Yorkshire Police convened an emergency meeting to discuss the response. The chairman of the Bradford Hate Crime Scrutiny Panel attended. She suggested the force should focus on the Jewish community that had been attacked and address what she called the elephant in the room of Islamist extremism. She was removed from her position within days. Six complaints were filed against her. All six came from within West Yorkshire Police. Three were filed within two hours and fifteen minutes of the meeting ending. Not one came from a member of the Jewish community whose synagogue had just been attacked. This was not the first time West Yorkshire Police had moved against her. In April 2025 the panel reviewed the case of a man charged with a hate crime for telling a Muslim call handler that the Prophet Mohammed was a paedophile. The chairman argued, correctly, that criticising a religious figure is not a criminal offence. A panel of lawyers agreed. The case was downgraded. Muslim police officers demanded her removal. The internal emails obtained by the woman through a Subject Access Request and published today by Allison Pearson and Gordon Rayner in the Telegraph are extraordinary. One email from a West Yorkshire Police address reads: the views and opinions of the scrutiny panel chair are incredibly concerning and do not line with the values of West Yorkshire Police. I believe the only course of action is to remove her as chair and from the scrutiny panel. Another describes her observation that Mohammed married a nine year old as an outright hate crime requiring escalation. A third describes her comments about the Manchester attack as absurd and racist for suggesting the Muslim community was responsible. The Muslim community was responsible. The attacker's name was Jihad Al-Shamie. Bradford District Commander Richard Padwell wrote to inform her of her removal. His letter noted that her comments were not being recorded as a hate crime and that he would not be providing her personal details to those community members who had concerns about her comments. The woman described the letter as sounding like a threat. The implication that her personal details had been requested and that a hate crime designation had been considered for naming the community responsible for an antisemitic terrorist attack is not a bureaucratic technicality. It is an instrument of intimidation. West Yorkshire Police has form. In March 2021 a religious studies teacher at Batley Grammar School showed his pupils a cartoon of Mohammed. He and his family went into hiding under threat of violence where they still remain five years later. A government commissioned report found he had been totally and utterly failed by West Yorkshire Police who did not treat him as a victim of crime. Nothing changed. Lord Young of the Free Speech Union, who is supporting the former chairman's case, said the force was more concerned with protecting the feelings of Muslim community leaders than protecting Jews from terrorist attacks. That is a precise description of what three documented incidents from the same police force in the same region over four years confirm. The Batley teacher is still in hiding. The Manchester synagogue was attacked. The woman who named the community responsible was sacked. And the police force responsible for protecting all communities in West Yorkshire spent its energy filing complaints against a retired academic for stating the obvious. Two tier policing is not a political allegation. In West Yorkshire it is a documented institutional reality. "The Muslim community was responsible. The attacker's name was Jihad Al-Shamie."

Another fuckwit scared of replies.

VAR Ref: "That looks like a clear red card." Assistant VAR: "To be honest, I'm feeling sorry for Arteta. He has bottled 3 titles in a row." VAR Ref: "Fair enough, play on!"

Well played Aaron Rai. Brilliant achievement.

The rancid old nazi cunt marching with people who want all Jews dead. That's rather antisemitic. And lying about a non existent genocide also is.

And here is why so few people vote CONservative now.

You should really, REALLY listen to this gentleman.

How to say 'we are a party of Lib Dum infiltrators' without saying it.

Where is the offensive threshold CPS @metpoliceuk ? “The Jews, you’re gonna get beheaded one by one.” “Dirty Jews.”

RT @RadioGenoa: Women in Islam. Liberal women who support Islam, what kind of brains do they have?

Is that the same Naz Shah that liked and retweeted, without comment, atweet saying that raped children should just shut their mouths about their ordeals, or a different one? You're all paedophile enabling scum.