Are you familiar with M E T A M A T E R I A L S $MMAT $MMAX @Metamaterialtec @palikaras

$MMTLP NEXT BRIDGE HYDROCARBONS 500 W. Texas Avenue, Suite 890 Midland, Texas 79701 432-684-0018 June 15, 2026 Dear Valued Shareholder, Thank you for your inquiry regarding shares available through our recently effective S-1 offering. I sincerely appreciate your interest and your continued support of Next Bridge Hydrocarbons. I want to personally apologize for the delays in this process. As many of you know, we have spent the past three and a half years navigating a complex and often challenging regulatory landscape. While reaching this milestone is an important achievement, there is still significant work ahead of us. I respectfully ask for your patience as we continue working through the remaining steps. Our team is actively engaged on multiple fronts, and I believe we are approaching several important developments that I look forward to sharing with shareholders in the near future. Your steadfast support, encouragement, and confidence in the company have helped carry us through an extraordinary journey. We do not take that support for granted, and we remain committed to acting in the best interests of all shareholders. Thank you again for your patience and trust. I look forward to updating you soon. Sincerely, Greg McCabe Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Next Bridge Hydrocarbons

You're a trust fund douchebag, not a founder, and the actual purpose of your app is to scrape private data to be resold. Get fucked.

🚨MMAT / MMTLP / TRCH 📄 DTCC Delay Timeline - a closer 👀 ⚖️June 16, 2026 - Hearing Before Judge Gary Spraker ⚠️Not Legal Advice The Trustee’s June 11 filing paints a clear picture: DTCC has been delaying production for more than a year while statute-of-limitations deadlines continue to approach. ⏰ 📅 Key Timeline 🔵March 2025 Trustee serves Rule 2004 subpoena on DTCC. Production due April 8, 2025. ⬅️⬅️⬅️ 🔵March 26, 2025 DTCC acknowledges subpoena. Requests extension and protective order. 🔵April 7, 2025 Trustee grants DTCC a two-week extension. 🔵June 16, 2025 DTCC states it can provide: •Participant Daily Activity Statements •CNS Reports •UTC Reports (including Correspondent Clearing Data) for approximately $25,200. 💵 ⸻ 🚩 October 2025 – Frustration Boils Over 🔥 🔵October 21, 2025 Trustee counsel David Burnett warns: “If we don’t hear from you this week we plan to file a motion to compel.” 🔥 Later the same day, Burnett responds to DTCC: “You are the one that has not responded to our questions for four months or given edits or comments on the protective order for five months.” 💥 DTCC responds that production would occur only under an: “appropriately scoped Rule 2004 subpoena” and continues to reserve objections. ⸻ 🔵November 4, 2025 Burnett follows up again: “Please provide us the courtesy of a substantive, timely, and constructive response.” and warns: “If you continue to delay we will enforce our rights with the court.” ⸻ 📅 March 26, 2026 DTCC finally makes a partial production. However, Trustee says the critical transaction-level Correspondent Clearing Data was missing. ⁉️ ⸻ 📅 April–May 2026 🔵April 24 Trustee requests missing Correspondent Clearing Data. 🔵May 5 Another follow-up. Still unresolved. 🔵May 12 🚨Burnett warns: “Because of the time-sensitivity on our end and this dragged-out process, the Trustee is prepared to move to compel.” 🔵May 21 DTCC responds: IT team is still working on the report and having difficulty with aged data. 🔵May 26 Burnett replies: “We would like to get the additional data as soon as possible given time-sensitivities on our end.” ⏰ ⸻ 🔥 Key Statements From Burnett’s Declaration 📆Over One Year of Delay “I have been corresponding with DTCC’s in-house counsel… for over a year.” ➡️More Than 40 Emails “I have sent more than 40 emails to Ms. Bandler since spring 2025.” ➡️Weeks Between Responses “Ms. Bandler did not respond to some of my emails, and in some cases she did not respond for weeks.” 🌶️ ➡️Statute Concerns “Statute of limitations deadlines make DTCC’s immediate production of the remaining discovery very time-sensitive.” ⸻ ⚖️ What To POSSIBLY Expect Tuesday ⚠️NLA Judge Spraker will likely focus on: What specific data remains missing? Can DTCC actually produce it? How long will production take? How do the statute-of-limitations deadlines impact the estate? The Trustee’s filing appears designed to show: ✅ Subpoena issued March 2025 ✅ Extension granted ✅ Protective order negotiations ✅ 40 emails ✅ Partial production only ✅ Missing Correspondent Clearing Data ✅ Statute concerns repeatedly raised If DTCC arrives without a firm production timetable, Spraker may push for specific deadlines, status reporting, or a path toward a motion to compel. The filing strongly suggests the Trustee is documenting a year-long pattern of delay and connecting it directly to potential claim deadlines. ⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰

📣📣ILLEGAL NAKED SHORT SELLERS MAIN GOAL IS TO BANKRUPT THE COMPANY When a company comes under attack from predatory short sellers, their main goal is to bankrupt the company. WHY❓️ Because they have been selling or shorting something they don't own. This causes Phantom shares that don't exist. When they bankrupt a company, they NEVER HAVE TO COVER‼️ That's why the MMAT MMTLP Bankruptcy case is setting an important precedence. The Trustees is investigating, and the Judge has issued subpoenas that they are trying their hardest to avoid. BANKRUPTCY MAY NOT BE THEIR CRIMINAL CRIME CLEAN UP ANYMORE

🚨 Robinhood Corruption 🚨 Robinhood Caught Robbing Retail Investors Once Again… Robinhood systems were down today, preventing retail investors from selling their shares and options during market volatility. One retail investor reported being down $3,000 due to the outage alone. Robinhood’s response: “Robinhood saw record-breaking traffic today. As a result, some customers experienced latency and intermittent issues. Essential systems have recovered and our teams are closely monitoring.” Robinhood should have been prepared for the surge in traffic.. People are calling the outage another example of retail investors being put at a disadvantage. Some estimates show retail investor losses ranged from hundreds of thousands to over $1 million during the disruption. $GME $SPCX $AMC $HOOD Repost to show the corruption done by brokers 🔂

📌 MMAT | MMTLP | TRCH Meta Materials Inc. Bankruptcy Case No. 24-50792-gs (Chapter 7) Document No. 2870 Filed: June 12, 2026 ⚖️ Summary: Judge Gary Spraker granted the Trustee’s request for shortened time, allowing an expedited hearing regarding DTCC subpoena compliance and protective order administration. The order does not decide the DTCC dispute itself—it simply puts the matter before the Court on an accelerated schedule. 🚨 HEARING SCHEDULED: 📅 June 16, 2026 💥 🕤 9:30 AM PT 💻 Remote Zoom Hearing ⚠️ Not Legal Advice. For informational and entertainment purposes only.

Pleads Guilty Before Monday Trial “…The former star bond trader had been facing five charges, including investment adviser fraud and securities fraud, which each carry a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. The single charge he pleaded guilty to, of obstructing a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation in March 2024, carries a maximum sentence of five years….”

MMAT MMTLP TRCH 🚨WHY DOESN’T THE TRUSTEE PURSUE A MOTION TO COMPEL?🤔 ⚠️ Not legal advice - for discussion purposes. A motion to compel usually works best when: •The court knows exactly what is missing. •The producing party (DTCC) has had a chance to explain why it hasn’t produced it. •The judge understands any technical, confidentiality, or protective-order issues. •The moving party can show a clear record of efforts to resolve the dispute. The Trustee is essentially telling Judge Spraker: “We’ve been working on this for over a year, exchanged 40 emails, production is still incomplete, we’re running into statute-of-limitations concerns, and we need the Court involved now.” Then she specifically states one of her goals is: “…set a schedule and parameters for any motion to compel, if necessary.” ⸻ The filing identifies three objectives: 1️⃣ Force DTCC to explain itself The Trustee wants: “concrete information from DTCC about a date by which it will produce the Correspondent Clearing Data” In plain English: “Tell us exactly when we’re getting the data.” ⸻ 2️⃣ Resolve Protective Order Problems The Trustee specifically references: “ECF No. 2601” which is the protective-order framework. That suggests there may still be disagreements regarding: confidentiality designations who can view data how it can be stored how it can be used in litigation A status conference is often faster than filing a lengthy compel motion when the dispute may be procedural rather than outright refusal. ⬅️ ⸻ 3️⃣ Prepare for a Motion to Compel The filing expressly says: “set a schedule and parameters for any motion to compel, if necessary” That tells me the Trustee has not yet concluded DTCC is refusing outright. Instead: Current Position Production incomplete ✔️ Delays occurring ✔️ Missing data identified ✔️ Court intervention needed ✔️ But Not yet at “DTCC has definitively refused to comply.” ⸻ Why This Might Be Strategically Better If the Trustee files a motion to compel today, DTCC could respond: “We’re still producing.” “We’re working through confidentiality issues.” “The Trustee never asked the Court for assistance before filing.” By requesting a status conference first, the Trustee creates a record showing: cooperation patience multiple follow-ups attempts to resolve informally urgency because of limitations concerns That record makes a later motion to compel much stronger. ⸻ ⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰ This paragraph is probably the biggest headline: “Continued delay in DTCC’s production of the Correspondent Clearing Data risks prejudice to the estate, including exposure to statutes-of-limitations constraints on potential litigation…” That is unusually direct. 🎯 The Trustee is essentially telling Judge Spraker: 🚨 “I may have claims to investigate, but I need this DTCC data before limitations periods become a problem.” That is stronger language than we’ve seen in many prior filings. 👀 ⸻ This filing may signal: Near-Term The Trustee wants Judge Spraker to quickly get DTCC and the Trustee’s team in front of him and explain: What has been produced? What remains outstanding? Why is it outstanding? When will it be produced? Next Step If DTCC cannot provide satisfactory answers or a firm production schedule, then a formal Motion to Compel becomes much more likely. In other words: 📌 This filing looks less like an alternative to a motion to compel and more like the Trustee positioning herself to file one with maximum leverage if DTCC still doesn’t deliver. 💥 Not legal advice — just an interpretation of the docket and bankruptcy procedure. ⚖️📄

yeah I am sick of the light exposing people with NO accountability.

🔥 MMAT Update – June 11, 2026 📄 Docket Nos. 2863, 2864, 2865 & 2866 What happened? Trustee Christina Lovato filed a series of motions asking Judge Spraker to schedule an expedited status conference regarding DTCC’s subpoena compliance and production delays. ⸻ 🎯 The Main Issue The Trustee says DTCC still has not fully produced certain subpoenaed records, particularly transaction-level Correspondent Clearing Data that has been requested since 2025. According to Trustee counsel David Burnett: “That data is very important to our analysis.” In simple terms, this appears to be data that could help identify who was actually involved in specific trades, not just trading totals. ⸻ ⏰ Why The Rush? This is the biggest takeaway. The Trustee specifically warned the Court that continued delays could impact potential claims because of statute-of-limitations deadlines. Burnett also stated: “Statute of limitations deadlines make DTCC’s immediate production … very time-sensitive.” 🚨 That’s strong language coming directly from Trustee counsel. ⸻ 📬 What’s Next? At this point: ✅ DTCC has not filed a Motion to Quash ✅ Trustee has not filed a Motion to Compel ✅ Trustee wants Judge Spraker to step in and hold a focused conference to address DTCC’s outstanding production and determine next steps. ⸻ 👀 What Stands Out The repeated focus on: 🔹 Correspondent Clearing Data 🔹 Transaction-level records 🔹 Time-sensitive discovery 🔹 Statute-of-limitations concerns suggests the Trustee believes this remaining DTCC data is important to the ongoing investigation. 📌 Bottom Line: The investigation appears very much alive, DTCC remains an active discovery target, and the Trustee is pushing for answers sooner rather than later. ⚖️ Not Legal Advice • For Discussion & Entertainment Purposes Only ⚖️ dropbox.com/scl/fi/pzyf05xks… dropbox.com/scl/fi/f5e7strlu… dropbox.com/scl/fi/n7umzargy…

CIRO to Hold a Hearing for RBC Dominion Securities - June 8, 2026 The settlement addresses the allegations that RBC failed to establish, maintain and enforce an adequate supervisory system for the futures trading activities of two of their Representatives. #Stockmarket #Canada

🚨🚨NO MISTRIAL ANDREW LEFT FOUND GUILTY AGAIN 🚨🚨 Left's defense team tried to argue that the trial was tainted and the jury used an outdated verdict form so the Judge should rule a mistrial. The Judge took a different action sending the jury back with the correct verdict form. JURY TOOK AN HOUR AND CAME BACK WITH GUILTY VERDICT AGAIN‼️