This is the best explanation I’ve seen of the underlying theory/theology behind Woke:
Leftist theory is a civilizational replacement frame. The West is cast as a false center, the margins as the carriers of restoration, and the replacement (sublation) of that center as the path to a higher wholeness.
At the base of this framework is the belief that humanity once lived in a simpler, more organic unity, often imagined by Marxists as primitive communism, an early condition before class division, hardened hierarchy, and large systems of domination fully took shape. That first unity is lower, simpler, and less developed, but it is still imagined as more whole than what came after.
Then comes the break / ruptures. Domination enters history and turns living human relations into systems of separation, hierarchy, and control. In left theory, that rupture reaches its most expansive and world-shaping form in the West. Through empire, Christianity, colonialism, capitalism, whiteness, European power, bureaucracy, and technocratic administration, the West universalizes the break and gives it global form.
This rupture produces alienation, meaning human beings become separated from what they produce, from one another, from nature, and finally from themselves. Human powers no longer appear as our own shared capacities. They return to us as external systems that rule over us. Alienation then hardens into reification. Reification means that living human relations come to appear as fixed, thing-like structures that seem natural, objective, and permanent. A social order people made begins to look as though it exists on its own and obeys laws no one made. Capital looks self-moving. Bureaucracy looks inevitable. Hierarchy looks normal. Empire looks civilizational. Human beings confront their own frozen powers as if they were an external reality.
The margins matter because they are treated as the place where living force survives in damaged form, while the center is treated as a dead structure that lives by enclosing, organizing, and feeding on that force. The oppressed, excluded, colonized, racialized, and culturally peripheral become the bearers of the living remainder, the human substance the dominant order could never fully absorb or erase. What the center calls backward, broken, marginal, or impure is reinterpreted as the place where real vitality and restorative force still survive.
The center presents itself as the source of order, intelligence, productivity, and legitimacy. In this framework, however, it is derivative rather than creative. It does not generate life from within. It captures energies that originate elsewhere, concentrates them, and presents that concentration as its own greatness. Its apparent fullness depends on the continued containment of forces that remain more alive at the edges than at the core.
Praxis is the means of recovery. Praxis means conscious, transformative practice, action shaped by an understanding of the world and aimed at changing it. It is not only a matter of opposing the existing order. It is also the process through which people become aware of themselves as historical agents by acting to change the conditions that shaped them. Here it functions as de-reification, the undoing of the dead forms that have trapped living force inside them. De-reification shows that what looked natural was historical, what looked permanent was contingent, and what looked self-sustaining was actually feeding on captured life. Through struggle, consciousness, and collective action, value is reclaimed from the center, legitimacy is transferred outward, and the dominant order is exposed as hollow.
Political action therefore takes on a deeper role than reform. Reform adjusts the existing order. Praxis, in this stronger sense, identifies where restorative force still survives, activates it, and lifts it out of the structures that enclosed it. As that happens, the old center weakens because the energies that sustained it no longer flow into it in the same way. The people acting against the system are changed in the process as well. They do not merely confront history. They become conscious participants in remaking it.
This leads to sublation, which means overcoming a form while preserving and redirecting what was real within it. The old order is not simply destroyed. It is surpassed, stripped of its monopoly, and absorbed into a higher synthesis. The false center collapses, but the energies once trapped inside it are recovered and reassembled. The end point is framed as restoration rather than simple negation. The promise is that the world can be made whole again, but on a higher plane than before, with the gains of history retained while the forms of domination that organized them are overcome.
The goal is therefore larger than reform. Reform leaves the center intact. This framework aims at replacement. The world was once whole in a lower form, then shattered through domination, then universalized in broken form by the West, and can now be made whole again only by displacing the false center and transferring historical energy to the margins. The promised end is a restored wholeness at a higher level, more conscious, more universal, and more complete than before.
That is why, in this framework, replacement of the West is presented as redemption.