Hopefully @EverlastingOS can sleep soon, his excitement has been amazing to see 😁 The unlocking of creativity is exactly what we are aiming to replicate to billions of people throughout the coming years for all types of data ownership economies. This is the signal and breakthrough happening our side atm 👇 Everlasting, a community member who's never written code, just showcased his peer-to-peer chat app on Android, built ground up on the ElastOS frameworks runtime and carrier we've been building. Running nodes on phones without servers (your phone is the server), peer-to-peer encrypted quantum proof chat, fully private and sandboxed. The breakthrough for us though more than anything is who built it. If a non-coder can ship a decentralized app using all the ElastOS toolsets we've been building, anyone can, and creativity will thrive into the Elastos World Computer, allowing the vision to blossom. Go Everlasting go!

🔥 BIG: Nvidia and Microsoft partner up to reinvent Windows PCs for the personal AI era with RTX Spark, a 1-petaflop superchip launching this fall.

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. "At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand." An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion." Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School Boston University ·

Only 3 days left before the 7th Elastos DAO election closes, there's still time to throw your hat in the ring. Check out the guide below to get started. docs.elastos.net/blockchain/…

Council Member ≠ Management There is confusion around the role of Elastos DAO Council members. Being a Council member does NOT mean you become “management of Elastos,” a legal representative of the ecosystem. Council members are governance participants whose primary role is to review Proposals, vote independently, and help facilitate decentralized decision-making.

“SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink, and The Boring Company are philanthropy. If you say philanthropy is love of humanity, they are philanthropy. “Tesla is accelerating sustainable energy. “This is philanthropy. “SpaceX is trying to ensure the long-term survival of humanity with multi-planet species. “This is love of humanity. “Neuralink is here to help solve brain injuries and existential risk with AI — love of humanity. “The Boring Company is trying to solve traffic, which is hell for most people, and that also is love of humanity.” -@elonmusk

DAO governance was never meant to create corporate hierarchy, but to distribute decision-making through transparent Proposals, open discussion, and independent voting. Governance should belong to the community, not a concentrated few. This is the spirit of the Elastos DAO.