Joined July 2020
104 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
There are many issues in which Biden has failed to meaningfully distinguish himself from Trump. It is also true that Trump really would be worse in ways that remain important e.g. climate change policy, judicial appointments
2
238
Maybe I haven't done enough async work, but .then and .ContinueWith are still more natural for me than await syntax. (I also don't know whether await syntax allows one to spawn a bunch of tasks and then Task.WhenAll them)
RT if you lived through this
2
1
451
21 Jun 2024
SHIT goddamn it!
21 Jun 2024
Linda Tirado, journalist shot by police in 2020 protest, is dying of her injuries, enters hospice care npr.org/2024/06/21/nx-s1-501…
110
14 Jun 2024
Here Yudkowsky talks about how the paperclip maximizing AI will kill humans even if it has lots of other goals too. But The reason for focusing on the paperclips isn't just rhetorical simplicity. More goals -> more chances that humans might be useful for some of them
You try to explain how airplane fuel can melt a skyscraper, but your calculation doesn't include relativistic effects, and then the 9/11 conspiracy theorists spend the next 10 years talking about how you deny relativity. Similarly: A paperclip maximizer is not "monomoniacally" "focused" on paperclips. We talked about a superintelligence that wanted 1 thing, because you get exactly the same results as from a superintelligence that wants paperclips and staples (2 things), or from a superintelligence that wants 100 things. The number of things It wants bears zero relevance to anything. It's just easier to explain the mechanics if you start with a superintelligence that wants 1 thing, because you can talk about how It evaluates "number of expected paperclips resulting from an action" instead of "expected paperclips * 2 staples * 3 giant mechanical clocks * 1000" and onward for a hundred other terms of Its utility function that all asymptote at different rates. The only load-bearing idea is that none of the things It wants are galaxies full of fun-having sentient beings who care about each other. And the probability of 100 uncontrolled utility function components including one term for Fun are ~0, just like it would be for 10 components, 1 component, or 1000 components. 100 tries at having monkeys generate Shakespeare has ~0 probability of succeeding, just the same for all practical purposes as 1 try. (If a googol monkeys are all generating using English letter-triplet probabilities in a Markov chain, their probability of generating Shakespeare is vastly higher but still effectively zero. Remember this Markov Monkey Fallacy anytime somebody talks about how LLMs are being trained on human text and therefore are much more likely up with human values; an improbable outcome can be rendered "much more likely" while still being not likely enough.) An unaligned superintelligence is "monomaniacal" in only and exactly the same way that you monomaniacally focus on all that stuff you care about instead of organizing piles of dust specks into prime-numbered heaps. From the perspective of something that cares purely about prime dust heaps, you're monomaniacally focused on all that human stuff, and it can't talk you into caring about prime dust heaps instead. But that's not because you're so incredibly focused on your own thing to the exclusion of its thing, it's just, prime dust heaps are not inside the list of things you'd even consider. It doesn't matter, from their perspective, that you want a lot of stuff instead of just one thing. You want the human stuff, and the human stuff, simple or complicated, doesn't include making sure that dust heaps contain a prime number of dust specks. Any time you hear somebody talking about the "monomaniacal" paperclip maximizer scenario, they have failed to understand what the problem was supposed to be; failed at imagining alien minds as entities in their own right rather than mutated humans; and failed at understanding how to work with simplified models that give the same results as complicated models.
1
82
Ellesystem retweeted
Even without the electoral implications … this is what governance *is*. Major pieces of legislation are a necessary first step. But after that, so much of the actual policy implementation comes via small, boring administrative actions.
1
34
120
32,007
Ellesystem retweeted
I feel like I'm losing my mind a little: people understand that "occupying buildings on campus" is, like, one of the most common forms of studen protest for decades and not some devious new ploy devised by professional anarchist plotters, right?
6,261
8,095
56,556
5,270,576
Ellesystem retweeted
Student activism is never perfect. You’ll always find some protestors who are ignorant or overzealous or narcissistic. They’re like 19 years old. But you also can’t wait for the perfect protest. It will never come. I really do empathize with the difficult position of leftwing Jews who support the ceasefire but are also wounded by protestors saying ignorant or antisemitic shit like “Israelis go back to Europe.” The average US college student is probably not aware that most Israeli Jews are Mizrahi or Sephardi and not in any sense from Europe. They’re probably not aware of a lot of things, and sometimes their rhetoric is tonedeaf or worse. Those protestors should be educated and corrected. But the central purpose of the protests is to address an urgent humanitarian crisis. Many students are bravely risking police violence to speak out. So obsessing over the occasional broken window or offensive slogan seems to me like a warped sense of priorities.
384
1,721
19,133
1,558,307
27 Apr 2024
He really was (sadly, he passed away about a week ago).
Daniel Dennett is a full-blown genius, so I guess it shouldn't surprise me that he's succinctly summed up my gravest concerns about AI and society. bbc.com/future/article/20240… ht @Geofutures
1
61
26 Apr 2024
ADHD diagnosis was very helpful for me; if I had gotten it before college my life would have turned out completely differently. Haven't tried to get autism diagnosis. Can tell I'm different both from NT and many/most ADHDers but had vague sense that dx wouldn't help anything
As someone who was officially diagnosed with anxiety, ADHD, and autism in adulthood lemme tell you the energy effort time wasted and trauma induced by obtaining such a dx was extremely unhelpful and once obtained provided me with virtually no support or benefits...
1
92
Educators--don't let technologists and espeically tech billionaires sell you what the future of education is! We should be adapting our field to your needs, not vice versa. 4/4
3
43
199
22,070
There's a widely quoted poll result that people would prefer their legislators to "compromise to get things done" than remain ideologically pure. Sinema is a great refutation of the premise of this question- ideologically impure to the point of *not* getting BBB done.
5 Mar 2024
NEWS- Kyrsten Sinema announces she’s leaving Senate. “Because I choose civility, understanding, listening, working together to get stuff done, I will leave the Senate at the end of this year. “
68
18 Jan 2024
v tempted to write a paper about some random activation function with an intro that just says "it's an activation function. If you don't already know what that is or why you might be interested, read literally any other paper on activation functions. anyway this one did ok"
83
Ellesystem retweeted
While this is very true, please extend that same message to recognizing that it is anti-Palestinian and Islamophobic to collectively punish all Palestinians for the actions of Hamas.
A festival in VA canceled a menorah lighting — which had nothing to do with Israel —because it claimed celebrating Chanukah would imply support for the “killing/bombing” of Gaza. It is antisemitic to hold Jews collectively responsible for Israel. Period. ujcvp.org/ujc-chai-lights/f/…
3
10
37
4,582
Something I've never had a good handle on, but that I think I see much more on Twitter than I do in other areas of my life: when people condemn others (who often deserve condemnation) but they do so by imputing obviously false motives/desires on the part of the person condemned
1
34
Which of course is a totally valid thing to think- examining intent might just have too high an energetic cost to be worth it. It's just confusing for me in particular bc these sentiments appear to be phrased specifically in terms of a statement of the condemned's intent
1
21
Also, it took me a really long time to realize "how's it going" is not a question, so there's that
20