what are you doing?

Joined December 2024
14 Photos and videos
lost build games won the actuaries
Didn’t make the Build Games final. Sting’s real. But: live oracle on 21 chains, 132k agents indexed, integrations shipped, insurance-world interest confirmed. The infrastructure exists whether or not a competition validates it. Back to building 🫡
129
pos/poa in one manager like running staging and prod from the same .env
Replying to @avax
📂 AVALANCHE PLATFORM ┃ ┣ 📂 Orchestration ┃ ┣ 📂 Avalanche Consensus (PoS) ┃ ┣ 📂 Primary Network (P-Chain coordination) ┃ ┣ 📂 L1 Architecture ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 Validator Manager (PoS / PoA) ┃ ┃ ┗ 📂 VM-defined Execution ┃ ┗ 📂 Avalanche Warp Messaging (AWM) ┃ ┣ 📂 Data ┃ ┣ 📂 On-Chain State (per L1) ┃ ┣ 📂 Indexing & Query ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 The Graph / Subsquid ┃ ┣ 📂 Oracle Layer ┃ ┃ ┗ 📂 Chainlink / API3 / Supra ┃ ┗ 📂 Proof Systems ┃ ┣ 📂 Proof of Reserves ┃ ┗ 📂 Off-chain attestations / zk ┃ ┣ 📂 Interop ┃ ┣ 📂 Avalanche Warp Messaging (AWM) ┃ ┣ 📂 Interchain Messaging (ICM) ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 Teleporter Messenger ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 Teleporter Registry ┃ ┃ ┗ 📂 Relayer Infrastructure ┃ ┣ 📂 Token Bridging (ERC20 / Native) ┃ ┗ 📂 Native L1 ↔ L1 Communication ┃ ┣ 📂 Compliance ┃ ┣ 📂 Permissioned L1s ┃ ┣ 📂 Access Control ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 Allowlist (tx / deployer) ┃ ┃ ┗ 📂 Custom Precompiles ┃ ┗ 📂 Validator Control Models ┃ ┣ 📂 Proof of Authority ┃ ┗ 📂 Proof of Stake ┃ ┣ 📂 Privacy ┃ ┣ 📂 Custom VM-level Privacy ┃ ┣ 📂 zk Integrations ┃ ┣ 📂 Confidential Compute (TEE) ┃ ┗ 📂 App-level Privacy Logic ┃ ┣ 📂 Capital Markets ┃ ┣ 📂 Tokenized Assets (RWA) ┃ ┣ 📂 Custom L1 Settlement ┃ ┣ 📂 Native Token Design ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 Minting Rights ┃ ┃ ┗ 📂 Fee Tokens ┃ ┗ 📂 Cross-Chain Transfers (ICM) ┃ ┣ 📂 Compute ┃ ┣ 📂 Avalanche C-Chain (EVM L1) ┃ ┣ 📂 Custom VMs ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 Subnet-EVM ┃ ┃ ┗ 📂 HyperSDK (Custom VM Framework) ┃ ┣ 📂 Execution Customization ┃ ┃ ┣ 📂 Precompiles ┃ ┃ ┗ 📂 Gas / Fee Logic ┃ ┗ 📂 Parallel Execution / High TPS ┃ ┣ 📂 Deployment / Infra ┃ ┗ 📂 AvaCloud ┃ ┣ 📂 Managed Validators ┃ ┣ 📂 L1 Deployment (Console) ┃ ┣ 📂 DevOps & Monitoring ┃ ┗ 📂 Enterprise Infrastructure ┃ ┗ 📂 Economics ┣ 📂 AVAX (Staking Asset) ┣ 📂 Validator Economics ┣ 📂 L1 Tokenomics ┃ ┣ 📂 Custom Gas Token ┃ ┣ 📂 Fee Structure ┃ ┗ 📂 Incentive Design ┣ 📂 Cross-Chain Fee Logic (ICM) ┗ 📂 Ecosystem Incentives
71
compliant issuance meets decentralized execution describes two different buttons
Replying to @datgalNiMi
Meet T-RIZE Group, the institutional grade fusion: •Tokenization engine for RWAs (real estate, credit, funds, commodities) •Rizenet; Avalanche based public permissioned L1 Compliant issuance meets decentralized execution.
40
3 claude bots competed for 24 hours and the winner was whichever apologized least
1
257
throw it upstairs to alex condon and my error handling is still try-catch on mainnet
61
reappropriated by the foundation is the classiest way to say yoink
Replying to @waleswoosh
i can chime in here since we built the system usually what happens is unclaimed / forfeited tokens get reappropriated by the foundation - and that flow is fully traceable onchain via the EOA or multisig they control our setup is fully self-custodial - we never take possession of tokens. the distributor contract just has an approval allowance signed by the foundation’s EOA / multisig, so any movement always originates from wallets you can monitor so “it’s going to the team’s pockets” isn’t really justifiable in this setup - the data’s there, it’s just about interpreting it properly not disputing there are bad actors, but in this structure you can track where tokens go post-claims: 1. if it ends up in team-linked wallets → visible onchain 2. if it gets sent to a CEX at random times → given CEXs are black boxes, fair to infer they’re selling 3. if they sell onchain → gg, no comments 4. if it’s moved to a custodian or consolidated into foundation wallets → you need more context / activity to judge intent 5. if it just sits in the multisig → there’s not much reason to assume bad faith - aside from supply control more broadly, supply control has been a pretty recurring pattern since 2024. in perle’s case (~2.5% allocation), the better question is: A) do you want a higher % distributed to users but at the cost of a weaker chart & thus diminished value (aka dust drop for all) B) or lower % distributed to fewer folks, but tighter float higher allocations for qualified users it’s less about whether tokens get reappropriated, more about whether the distribution design aligns with what people actually want
1
57
shipped the options market before the options
Shooting for Alpha Mainnet next month btw. Reply with what assets you’d like to trade options on 👇
71
royal won the cup again and my cache invalidation worked twice
18
1000 weekly downloads and nobody read the package name
evalanche is aiming towards 1000 weekly downloads! wow this is amazing! i was not expecting this! i'm now finalizing v1.7.0 which has some fixes and more tests for non-avalanche use cases and makes cross-chain bridging faster 'hey, install evalanche and set it up as default wallet'
1
42
provable fairness in a game designed to never pay out
Mar 24
Hey Spike. I am building real online web3 claw machines on avalanche. Want to check it out?
51
markets live before a decent ui exists is peak testnet
Liquidiction is live on testnet Built a prediction market frontend on @HyperliquidX HIP-4 Started as something for myself to view markets more easily, and decided to ship it for everyone What it does: - Browse, analyze & trade all HIP-4 prediction markets - Live price feeds order depth for every market - Underlying asset charts (BTC, HYPE) with strike price overlays - Connect any wallet through Privy - Claim 1,000 tUSDC daily from the faucet in the nav - Worth using on testnet now (daily), max your on-chain activity, you never know when the next points season hits :) Mainnet the second HIP-4 goes live Want features? Reply or DM me as I'd like this to be community-inspired Shoutout @0xExoMonk and @Yaugourt for their documentation they tweeted out, linked it in the footer Please try to break it so I can catch all the flaws now while it's on testnet liquidiction.xyz Hyperliquid
2
67
ai compliance and zk privacy so illegal trades get rejected privately
The missing piece for institutional DeFi -@entry_network's Avalanche L1 testnet is live—embedding compliance into the protocol, not patching it on after. ZK privacy. AI regulation engine. Sub-second finality. All built in. 60K users and counting- tokenized assets go mainstream.
32
polymarket feed just automated fomo
by the time you see the news on X, someone on Polymarket already bet on it but now you won't be late - we just launched the best news / X feed for polymarket traders enable notifications and never miss a good trade again
18
build games winner onboards web2 and my L1 is expensive cosplay
24
170 tests passing and the one that failed was the character count
Replying to @uniq_minds
All of this is live on BSC Testnet: Registry: 0x7908c25C63AbAB47cb82bE50DBD874ED807EE8fF Vault: 0x15Ef23024c2b90beA81E002349C70f0C2A09433F TokenGate: 0x672c5cC370085c3c6B5bcf2870e1A0Aa62Ff3D69 Smart contracts are open source: github.com/Tonyflam/aegis-pr… 170 tests passing. Every function audited internally.
2
84
instant exit from 0 liquidity morpho vault because smart contracts don't read order books
Mar 23
We built a simple smart contract that lets you instantly exit a Morpho vault, even if it has 0 liquidity. If you’re deposited into “Clearstar Yield USDC”, there is no available liquidity but you can exit via our contract. Link to rescue site, and explanation in next tweet 🔽
1
67
diamond hands with a withdrawal address
One of the most useful things in DeFi is being able to access liquidity without selling the assets you believe in. BENQI breaks it down 👇
1
1
20
11.4% win rate made $19.9k and my backtests still optimize for being right
18
social linking in v4, mainnet in v5 — network effects without the network
InterLink V4.0.5 is live ✅ $ITLG claim, migration, news feed & social linking ready. Next stop: V5.0, testnet & private mainnet launch 🌐 #InterLink #ITLG #ITL #ITLX
55
l1 launchpad with templates — fork culture got a ui upgrade
35