Free sprit, Free thinker, music lover, movie lover, animal lover, nature lover. no DMโs!!
Joined March 2010
- Tweets 129,446
- Following 7,503
- Followers 3,772
- Likes 239,119
1,158 Photos and videos
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
Are you fucking ok?!!!!!! You are the biggest national embarrassment and cause of child endangerment in our country. Your woke and warped politics has children in Scotland carrying hatchets. Has girls being raped on Brighton beach and 17 year old girls getting stabbed while walking down the street in Burnley. Seriously, go fuck yourself.
3
20
208
982
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
๐จNEWS: Teachers have expressed OUTRAGE at Keir Starmer's proposed social media ban for children as it will include YOUTUBE, a site children use for learning in school
99
309
2,578
32,408
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
๐จNEW: YouTube has released a statement regarding Keir Starmerโs announcement of BANNING social media for under 16s ๐ฌ๐ง
"YouTube is a vital resource for young people, educators and parents. Blanket bans push kids out of such curated, supervised, beneficial experiences and towards anonymous, less safe services"
Unfortunately, thatโs exactly where Starmer would like children to be, in less safe spaces - hence why he isnโt going to ban BlueSkyโฆ.
136
638
3,145
80,585
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
Starmer's U-16 social media ban has nothing to do with protecting children.
It is about censoring patriots and critical thinkers (which is why BlueSky is exempt) and setting up Digital ID verification for adults to use the internet.
The Starmer regime needs to be gone.
37
125
487
4,696
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
Banning social media for under 16โs is going to fail and it will lead to more government control over you.
Politicians Iโve interviewed cant even tell me how a VPN works. How can they legislate something they donโt understand?
60% of Australian teens said they still use social media after a ban, and thats the ones being honest. You can guarantee the real number is higher.
Government will respond to this failure by introducing compulsory Digital ID. Once they achieve that, they can control and lockdown social media for anyone they like.
These laws are always initially brought in under the guise of keeping children safe. But ask yourself, how often do these policies work? How often does government relinquish power when it fails and how often does it double down demanding more control to โfix the problemโ they have created.
Very slippery slope.
75
156
844
11,868
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
Are you fucking ok?!!!!!! You are the biggest national embarrassment and cause of child endangerment in our country. Your woke and warped politics has children in Scotland carrying hatchets. Has girls being raped on Brighton beach and 17 year old girls getting stabbed while walking down the street in Burnley. Seriously, go fuck yourself.
I am simply not prepared to be a bystander when the safety and happiness of our children are at stake.
We will ban social media access for under 16s, and give children their childhoods back.
Read more about it here: keirstarmer.substack.com/p/gโฆ
ALT Prime Minister Keir Starmer gives a press conference about keeping children safe online.
2
19
85
1,157
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
X already has age verification, so do most other social media and gaming apps.
Starmer is lying to you, he is creating a route to Digital ID for everybody.
24
297
1,493
9,906
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
๐จ NEW: YouTube has hit out at the UK's social media ban for under-16s
"YouTube is a vital resource for young people, educators and parents. Blanket bans push kids out of such curated, supervised, beneficial experiences and towards anonymous, less safe services"
209
935
9,745
367,760
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
Baroness Claire Fox condemns the UK government's efforts to censor speech and manage public perception in the wake of recent violent incidents.
She warns that silencing legitimate anger over mass migration, both legal and illegal, only intensifies social unrest.
"People are very upset and worried about the fact that they have constantly voted and used their democratic voice to say do something about both illegal immigration, but also the problem of non-integrated mass migration that was never agreed democratically."
"And they're just ignored. And then they're treated as though they're the problem."
"The political class are terrified of losing control of the narrative."
"They realise that one of the positive things about social media... is that we sometimes find out things we wouldn't have been allowed to be told by those that rule us."
"How dare they say that they're going to try and contain our emotional response to some terrible things that are happening."
"When they try and suppress it, it makes it worse."
4
60
172
5,255
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
What you're doing is totally transparent.
You're using "child safety" as an emotional crowbar to impose device-level digital ID infrastructure on the entire population.
x.com/wideawake_media/statusโฆ
"Online safety" laws and age verification mandates have absolutely NOTHING to do with protecting children.
You cannot stop under-16s from accessing a website without checking the age of everyone who visits it. And you cannot check everyone's age without forcing them to prove who they are.
"Child safety" is the cheese in the mousetrap.
Laws sold under the banner of "child protection" constitute a Trojan horse for a system requiring every adult to verify their identity before they can speak, read, or post online. The child is merely an emotional shield. The adult is the real target.
And once that infrastructure exists, the pretext can be swapped out at will.
Today it is pornography, social media and "harmful content". Tomorrow it is messaging apps and online banking. Soon after it is your ability to access the internet at allโeach incremental step gated behind a digital ID you are required to keep in good standing.
It's no accident that the exact same "online safety" agenda is being rolled out across the entire Western world simultaneously, with each national government reaching for a slightly different pretext to justify the same outcomeโa verified digital identity standing between you and the open internet.
Different countries. Different pretexts. Same infrastructure.
They are not building a system to keep children safe. They are building the identity layer for a permission-based internetโorchestrated from the supranational level by people you never electedโwhere access to information itself becomes conditional on obedience.
The point is not to make the internet safer. The point is to make anonymous access impossible.
Because a person who can read, speak, organise and dissent anonymously is difficult to control. A person whose most intimate online activity is anchored to a state-monitored digital ID is not.
Once every account, search, post, payment, message and website visit is tied to a verified identity, the internet stops being a public square and becomes a monitored enclosure.
But the gate only closes if people accept "online safety" laws at face value.
9
96
555
15,109
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
The Australian Government banned X but allowed BlueSky for children Under 16.
BlueSky is well known for the large number of pedoโs speaking openly about their perversions & grooming, seeking out vulnerable children.
It was NEVER about the kids.
50
554
1,389
14,749
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
The fact that Kier Starmer is banning every single social media app for kids EXCEPT Bluesky tells you everything you need to know
It's the most deviant, left wing, degenerate social media available and he wants your kids exclusively on there
123
991
5,705
51,969
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
Left-wing social media network could be exempt from Keir Starmer's mass internet clampdown
gbnews.com/politics/social-mโฆ
344
347
931
47,133
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
Have you ever seen someone get so excited about banning kids from using YouTube?
He's actually giddy with glee
Complete sociopath
881
2,357
14,854
159,940
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
Ban this filth!
15
75
230
4,731
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
Child safety starts with parents, not the state
Children do not independently acquire smartphones
These devices are bought, configured, and managed by parents or carers
No child enters the online world without an adult making that decision first
And parents already have tools available to them
A parent who wants a child-lock on a phone can switch one on today - for free
It is already built into modern devices
Screen-time limits, app restrictions, and content filters exist right now and are widely available
Despite these basic facts, the appalling Starmer is trying to rush in measures that would almost certainly mean EVERYONE has to provide ID to get online
8
100
236
2,231
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
Pretending that censorship is about protecting children - indeed about protecting anyone but the worst of the worst, those who seek to shape the world in their own foul image - is sickening.
41
299
1,374
12,478
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
๐จ A "BIG MOMENT FOR OUR COUNTRY."
Good morning to the millions of everyday Brits waking up to a new digital prison.
Keir Starmer has just officially announced his blanket ban on social media for teenagers!
He literally stood at a podium, rambled on about his childhood in the 1970s, and claimed he is doing this to keep your kids safe. ๐คก
You honestly have to laugh at the sheer delusion.
He completely refuses to protect our actual streets from violent criminals, but he is completely obsessed with policing your family's phones.
Do not be fooled for a single second!
To enforce this ban, every single adult in Britain will now be forced to upload a passport or digital ID just to browse the web!
This is not about child safety. It is a massive Trojan horse for total state surveillance.
RT if you see right through this scam and refuse to let the Labour elite control us! ๐ฌ๐ง๐ฅ
137
1,671
4,096
68,290
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
The introduction of a mandatory Digital ID will explain itself as many things, at many times.
At its core, it will require you provide identification โ not just at ports of entry โ but to access your way of life in your own nation.
The Social Media Ban for under 16s, inherently requires over 16s provide identification to access large portions of the internet.
Say NO to Digital ID.
We are banning social media access for under 16s.
These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life.
I just canโt let that go on anymore. So weโre giving children their childhoods back.
22
195
772
33,291
Peaceman.๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐โ๏ธ๐ง๐ฌ๐ถ๐ณ๐๐โค๏ธ retweeted
So let me get this ABSOLUTELY straightโฆ
The public are being told facial recognition cameras, Digital ID and eventually digital currency are all about โsecurityโ and โsafetyโ.
Meaning every payment, every document and every movement could one day be linked directly back to YOU.
But hereโs the part hardly anyone talks aboutโฆ
MPs and members of the Royal Family are reportedly exempt from parts of Digital ID systems for โsecurity reasonsโ.
So the very people creating and supporting these systems wonโt necessarily have to live under them in the same way as everyone else.
Ordinary people could end up being monitored through one vast digital network, while those at the top remain outside parts of it.
Whether you support Digital ID or oppose it, surely the same rules should apply to everyone.
Because the moment people believe there is one set of rules for MPs, the Royal Family and the political class, and another for everybody else, trust in government starts to disappear.
And looking around Britain today, itโs not hard to see why so many people are losing faith.
The real issue isnโt technology. Itโs whether the people creating the system are willing to live under it themselves and if they arenโt then WHY and WHY should anyone else be expected to then.
82
367
677
12,468