And you can be damn sure this was with the green light of the US. Good cop, bad cop in action again. I’m already hearing the keyboard clicks of Barak Ravid with another Axios post: “Trump furious on Netanyahu for attacks on Beirut.”

AOC hanging out with all the worst, corrupt Zionists in the NY delegation. Only thing missing is Dan Goldman and his Grand Marshal sash lol. Let this be a lesson of what happens when you get in with the wrong crowd.

Tasnim’s editor-in-chief in an interview with IRIB He says Iran should not trust the US, and the people being worried [and protest] about negotiations is actually a healthy sign of resistance. People warning negotiators not to give concessions should be welcomed, not dismissed. He also says technical criticism is useful as long as it does not break national unity. According to him, the MoU draft has already changed 6-7 times, including changes made by Iran’s own negotiating team, such as wording around the Strait of Hormoz. So proper criticism can improve the final text. The responsibility for the text of the possible agreement and its implementation lies with the negotiation team & the government.

The disgusting and filthy bourgeoisie are the enemies of all people and all nations. Their tastes are ugly, their worldview is retarded, their habits are swine-like, their culture is depraved and degenerate. And they rule only since the people lack confidence in themselves.

Nabavian is asking for specifics. This is what any contract should provide: specifics. An MOU is okay as a starting point but ONLY IF you are not giving up anything tangible at the beginning. Opening Hormuz “immediately” in exchange for vague nebulous terms on paper from an entity that has violated every deal you’ve ever made and has murdered most of your leadership, including your most important figure, on top of slaughtering your civilians and destroying your infrastructure with the hopes that they’ll actually abide by what they “agreed to” is so fucking stupid it’s unbelievable.

Protests have broken out against Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in the northeastern Iranian city of Mashhad over a proposed framework agreement that some Iranians believe is too favorable to the United States. The senior diplomat said on state TV yesterday that the framework had not yet been finalized and was still under internal review, but some hardline MPs and other officials have publicly, including on state television, forcefully criticized the purported document for making too many concessions to their defeated enemy, the United States.

Being a Marxist-Leninist means being on the side of humanity.

No approval yet from Iran, but Trump claims deal to be signed tomorrow, and threatens Iran with nuclear annihilation if talks don’t lead to desired results.

Jackson Hinkle visited the Iranian national team training today. Take a selfie for us, Jackson 😉❤️

Elon's not gonna fuck you lil bro

This is too funny

This is insane: • UofM cracks down on and arrests anti-genocide student protesters • Ann Arbor prosecutor Eli Savit declines to prosecute • UofM recruits MI AG and Zionist lunatic Dana Nessel to personally prosecute the case—HIGHLY unusual for such low-level charges • Nessel forced to drop all charges to preempt court finding her unable to fairly prosecute the case due to her bias against Arabs and Muslims as well as her ties to Zionist extremist groups caught attempting to influence the court • Nessel (a Democrat!) turns to Trump DoJ and Kash Patel to bring felony conspiracy charges against the students

Oil levels are critical It’s taken over 100 days for excess oil in the system and strategic reserves to reach this point The full effect of the war has not even begun to materialize yet Iran should not make any agreement until Trump feels the full heat of the war he started

I looked into this and apparently she had a 6 month affair with her boss while making her boyfriend "wait until marriage". The right-wing are addicted to cuckoldry.

❤️🇮🇷🇲🇽 I’m with TEAM IRAN in Tijuana, Mexico for the FIFA World Cup

Araghchi consistently kept trying to dance around the questions and avoided giving precise answers to the questions. Partly because of security reasons, of course, but mainly because he knows that many will oppose the current text if it gets public. Those opposing the MoU at the SNSC are probably the military commanders that have a seat and Saeed Jalili. Any SNSC decision only becomes final if the leader signs it, and thank God for that.

Iranian National Security Commission MP, Seyed Mahmoud Nabavian: “After reviewing the text of the agreement, I must say that, compared to the 2 previous versions, it is more damaging, and Iran’s retreats/concessions have also increased.”

"The Trotsky vs Stalin conflict doesn't matter anymore." It absolutely matters, because to this day Marxism-Leninism was never applied to the West. Only Trotskyism was. Knowingly or not, nearly all "radical Marxists" in the West - whatever they call themselves (Maoists, Hoxhaists, etc.) Have always taken Trotskyism for granted. Trotskyism can be defined by the following characteristics: 1) Radical arrogance: Rejection of the masses as a political subject, belief that the masses must conform to the assumptions of "intellectuals." 2) "Revolutionary" adventurism: The belief that you have everything figured out, and must now adventuristically conform reality to your consciousness 3) Liquidationism: Trotskyites believe that the revolutionary process liquefies, rather than sublates, all determinations within reality - nations, families, civilizations, etc. - suspending them in permanent negation. Rather than advance civilizations to a higher stage based on the foundation of past achievements, Trotskyites seek to destroy them wholesale, becoming allies with the lumpenized financial bourgeoisie via neoconservatism. 4) Trotskyites reject the reality of collective existence - parties, nations, civilizations - in favor of the purely "individual" reality of ideas and opinions. Trotskyites are sectarians by nature, and their nature, like amoeba, is to split incessantly. This sectarian disease infected all other Marxists in the "West" - due to a shared inability to comprehend collective existence beyond the thoughts and opinions of individuals. Trotskyite orgs are forever haunted by Trotsky's own original sin of trying to wreck the Bolsheviks because he didn't get his way. Now let's compare this to "Stalinism" 1) Marxist-Leninist praxis was always based in radical humility to the masses. Lenin, Mao, Che, etc. - all initiated a dialogue with the "backward" masses, peasants and farmers, that revealed revolutionary tendencies in ways that contradicted the assumptions of "intellectuals." 2) Marxist-Leninists believed that revolutionary consciousness can only develop in concert with the development of the masses and with reality - that without this, it is merely hot air. Building a foundation among the masses also defines the content of revolutionary consciousness, rather than imposing it on them. They begin not from the core, but from the rural periphery. 3) Marxist-Leninists reject that the revolutionary process liquidates humanity's past. It regards this process as the logical CULMINATION of a total and integral history. It affirms logical continuity with past conventions, norms, etc. Situating the revolutionary socialist future within the totality of history. It recognizes the rationality of historical laws, not the hot air of individual arrogance. 4) Marxist-Leninists do not regard the collective as the sum total of individuals, but as a more fundamental principle of existence. It regards this existence as objective, and not reducible to individual opinions or ideas - but a functional principle and logic of association. It affirms the reality of nations, civilizations, etc. - as integral forms of social existence. While these can develop and change, they develop and change on a firm foundation of accumulated historical development, rather than on the basis of individual consciousness. So yes - the difference between Trotskyism and Marxism-Leninism ABSOLUTELY still matters and is of dire importance: Because Marxism-Leninism was never even translated into the West. Tl;dr - in America, all we've had so far is Trotskyism, "real Stalinism has never been tried."

Capitalism works so well that 1 person has 1 trilions dollars while everyone else can't afford healthcare.