Calling observable, replicated data “pure racism” or “white supremacist language” is the actual anti-scientific dodge — not noticing it. Somalia’s national IQ is estimated at ~68 (British-normed mean of 100), based on the largest direct test available: Bakhiet et al. (2017) administered Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices — a culture-reduced, non-verbal intelligence measure — to 2,440 Somali refugee schoolchildren (ages 8–18) in Kenya’s Dadaab camps. After Flynn-effect adjustment, the mean came out at 68 with no meaningful sex difference. This aligns with Lynn/Becker’s updated datasets and a 2025 multi-source compilation still placing Somalia at 67.9. Refugee-camp limitations exist (trauma, malnutrition), but it’s the best psychometric evidence we have; no nationwide study inside Somalia is feasible amid decades of state failure. Those averages predict — and match — real outcomes in Minnesota’s ~100,000-strong Somali community (largest U.S. concentration, mostly refugee-selected): - Welfare use: 81% of Somali households receive some form of government assistance (73% Medicaid, 54% food stamps, 27% cash welfare). For households with children, it’s 89%. Natives: 21%. Even after 10 years in the U.S., rates barely drop. - Education: 39% of working-age Somalis have no high school diploma (vs. 5% natives). Somali students show the lowest proficiency rates in the state. - Fraud and crime: The Feeding Our Future scandal alone involved $250 million stolen from child-nutrition programs; 78 defendants charged so far, the overwhelming majority Somali/East African. Multiple other large-scale welfare schemes have followed the same pattern. Adjusted crime stats show young Somali males overrepresented in certain categories. Trump’s phrasing (“low IQ… bad people”) was blunt and politically radioactive. But the *pattern* — persistent gaps in education, employment, welfare, and rule-of-law metrics — is exactly what a ~68 national-origin average plus refugee (not elite) selection and high cousin-marriage rates would statistically produce. Group averages are real, heritable in part (~50–80%), and inform policy; they say nothing about any individual Somali-American’s worth, rights, or potential. Plenty of high-achieving exceptions exist, just as in every population. Labeling data-driven concern as “racism” doesn’t make the data disappear — it just guarantees the problems (welfare strain, integration failure, fraud) continue while punishing honest discussion. Policy should select immigrants for skills and assimilation potential, not pretend cognitive and cultural differences don’t exist. That’s realism, not supremacy.

The legacy media is pure propaganda. You are the media now.