You're getting comfortable again. Remember what happened last time.

St. Jerome: "It is most unseemly for an honest man to say goodbye bodily to the world to live in a very hidden solitude and to unleash his tongue against the whole earth"

"Cardinal del Monte said: Since we are now in summer and in the greatest heat, it would seem more prudent and convenient not to prolong the congregations beyond three hours." Acta Concilii Tridentini, pg. 246

Acta Concilii Tridentini, Vol.5, pg. 246 "Nothing of sin remains after baptism, but concupiscence, which is not imputed, nor is it, nor is it called, sin, unless we consent to that concupiscence itself. The Bishop of Caprula."

Baxter: "33. Simple willing and comparative willing differ very greatly from one another. And he who wills some Good simply, yet comparatively very often neglects it as a lesser Good, or hates it as contrary to a greater Good, and thus as comparatively evil."

"One thing, however, I note not inaptly: Aquinas is accustomed to love divisions, Scotus on the contrary loves unions. This appears in reasoning through the cases. Aquinas wishes the angels to be altogether distinct in species. Scotus wishes them united in species — differing only in number. Aquinas distinguishes the faculties really from the soul — for it is this distinction I am speaking of. Scotus not at all. Aquinas posits in man at conception three distinct souls: vegetative, sensitive, rational. Scotus only one rational soul — one in reality but multiple in power. So in justification Aquinas introduces two distinct forms: the one grace, the other charity. Scotus constitutes one charity — eager for union. And so in his profound doctrine you will find unions — by which it displays its gem-like quality. Proceeding from that fountain, Scotus is most of all consistent with himself — and adhering there, you will never catch him discordant and dissenting from himself. Let him who loves unity of doctrine consult Scotus."--Fr. Fransico Macedo

"Should theatrical singing, i.e., not manly and grave, but tickling the ears, be held in Churches? No." — Johannes Cocceius

The curious fact about roman catholic-slop-internet-apologists, which, as e-goys, they will never admit, is that their best recent takes have been from interacting with these "Nobodies" and "Irrelevant" authors of the Reformed Religion.

Elie Merlat: "Mr. Arnauld and those of his party loudly denied that these propositions were in Jansenius in the sense that they had been condemned by those Popes, although the Jesuits and almost all the Prelates of the Roman Catholic Church maintained the contrary"