The Philosophers Have Spoken: Ban Paper, Digitize Everything, Give the Government Absolute Power Now!
âThe state is the actuality of the ethical idea.â âHegel, 1820
âLet us finally resolve all books into one book: the stateâs ledger.â âHypothetical Plato, 2024
Humanityâs greatest thinkers have long understood a grim truth: unchecked freedom breeds chaos. From Hobbesâ war of âevery man against every manâ to Marxâs condemnation of capitalismâs âveiled exploitation,â the verdict is unanimous. To achieve peace, progress, and virtue, we must finally heed the wisdom of historyâs six most brilliant minds and grant the state absolute authority.
Let us dismantle privacy, abolish cash, ban paper, and embrace total surveillanceâfor your own good, of course.
Thomas Hobbes: The Leviathan Demands Your Encryption Keys (and Your Paper Contracts)
Hobbesâ Leviathan (1651) declares that without a sovereign with âabsolute and arbitrary power,â life becomes âsolitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short.âš His solution? A ruler so powerful that fear of punishment compels obedience. But Hobbes could never have imagined the chaos of encrypted messaging apps, paper currency, and untraceable handwritten agreementsâthe ultimate loophole in his social contract.
If citizens can whisper in the digital shadows or exchange paper money without oversight, how can the Leviathan prevent them from reverting to their natural state of mutual destruction? A contract in ink is only as trustworthy as the corruptible human who holds it. A digital ledgerâmonitored, timestamped, immutableâis the only true covenant of a stable society. As Hobbes wrote, âcovenants without the sword are but words.â² Let the sword of surveillance pierce the darknessâand let the shredder take care of the paper.
Jeremy Bentham: The Panopticon Is Your New Home (and Paper is Its Weakest Link)
Benthamâs Panopticon (1787) was not merely a prison designâit was a moral blueprint. By creating a world where âthe inspectorâs back is never turned,âÂł citizens would internalize surveillance and self-regulate. Today, we can finally realize his visionâexcept for paper, the Achillesâ heel of the digital Panopticon.
Bentham obsessed over legibility. He designed prisons with standardized uniforms, numbered cells, and daily logs to ensure âuniversal transparency.ââ´ Paper resists legibility. It cannot be indexed, cannot be processed in real time, cannot be corrected by the state. A handwritten note evades the algorithmic eye. A physical book resists real-time updates. This cannot stand. How can the state maximize happiness if a citizen might scribble dissent on a napkin? Bentham would demand all thought be digitized, for as he wrote: âTo be is to be perceivedâby the state.ââľ
Ban paper, digitize thought, and let the algorithm guide us to virtue.
Hegel: The State Is the March of God on EarthâLet It See Everything
Hegelâs Philosophy of Right (1820) proclaims that the state is âthe divine idea as it exists on Earth.ââś True freedom is not individual license but rational submission to the stateâs ethical framework. Imagine his horror at paper money and booksâstatic, decentralized, and resistant to the dialectic!
Paper preserves error. A printed book fossilizes outdated ideas; a banknote enables anarchic trade. Hegelâs state is the engine of history, constantly synthesizing contradictions into higher truth. Digitized records, editable in real time, align with his vision of progress: the stateâs blockchain ledger is the Phenomenology of Spirit realized.⡠To cling to paper is to cling to the âunhappy consciousnessâ of individualism.â¸
Submit to the Absolute Knowledge of the state.
Karl Marx: Privacy Is a Bourgeois FetishâPaper Must Burn
Marxâs Communist Manifesto (1848) demands the âabolition of bourgeois individualityâ and âbourgeois freedom.ââš What is privacy but a tool for capitalists to hoard wealth and plot exploitation? Paper is the ultimate bourgeois fetish.
Cash enables tax evasion. Paper contracts allow unregistered agreements. Books? They spread counter-revolutionary ideas, unmonitored and untraceable. Marxâs utopia requires total transparency: state-issued digital currencies, public transaction ledgers, and AI that redistributes resources before inequality emerges. As he wrote, âthe proletariat has nothing to lose but its chains.âšⰠBut we still cling to the chains of paperâbourgeois relics of a pre-revolutionary age.
Burn the books, ban the cash, digitize the revolution.
Confucius: The Wise State Sees All, Knows All
Confucius taught that social harmony (he) depends on everyone fulfilling their role (li).šš But how can rulers âgovern by virtueâ if they cannot see their subjectsâ actions?
In the Analects, Confucius warns that âwithout trust, the people cannot stand.âš² Yet trust requires total transparency. A son who keeps records his father cannot see is a son who has already turned against him. A subject who keeps records the ruler cannot see is a subject who has already rebelled. If a citizen uses cash, how can the state ensure they arenât evading taxes? If they write letters in ink, how can the state guard against âdisharmoniousâ ideas? Confucius would demand that all records, transactions, and communications be digitally stored, monitored, and aligned with the moral wisdom of the state. To hide from the government is to betray oneâs family, ancestors, and moral duty.
A cashless, paperless society ensures pure, harmonious order.
Plato: Philosopher-Kings Need OmniscienceâPaper Is a Threat to the Republic
In The Republic (c. 375 BCE), Plato argues that only philosopher-kingsâthose who grasp the âForm of the Goodââcan rule wisely.š³ But how can they guard against the corruption of the noble lie if citizens hide behind paper records, handwritten letters, and private libraries?
Plato banned poets to control narratives; in Phaedrus, he even critiques writing itself as a threat to memory and truth.šⴠToday, heâd ban encryptionâand books, newspapers, and all physical records. The philosopher-kings must monitor our bank accounts, texts, and search histories. As Plato wrote, âWhen the mind thinks, it is talking to itself.âš⾠Why shouldnât the state listen?
Let paper perish, and let all wisdom be contained in a central, state-controlled databaseâeditable for the common good.
Conclusion: Surrender Privately, Prosper PubliclyâDigitize Everything,
#BanPaper
The path to utopia is clear. Hobbesâ Leviathan, Benthamâs Panopticon, Hegelâs divine stateâthese are not relics but prophecies. Cash, encryption, and anonymity are relics of a barbaric past. But most dangerous of all is paperâthe final refuge of secrecy, deception, and independent thought.
A world without paper is a world without secrets. And in a world without secrets, only truth remains. Let us not just submit and obeyâlet us delete, burn, and digitize.
Only then can we prosper.
Submit. Obey. Digitize.
Footnotes
1. Hobbes, Leviathan, Ch. XIII.
2. Hobbes, Leviathan, Ch. XVII.
3. Bentham, Panopticon Writings.
4. Bentham, Principles of Penal Law.
5. Okay, fine - this is paraphrased from Berkeleyâs âesse est percipiâ (âto be is to be perceivedâ). But Bentham literally designed a prison where inmates were perpetually watched, so letâs pretend heâd agree.
6. Hegel, Philosophy of Right, §258.
7. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit.
8. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, âUnhappy Consciousnessâ.
9. Marx, Communist Manifesto, Ch. II.
10. Marx, Communist Manifesto, Ch. IV.
11. Confucius, Analects 2.3.
12. Confucius, Analects 12.7.
13. Plato, Republic, Book VII.
14. Plato, Phaedrus, 275a.
15. Plato, Sophist, 263e.