BitcoinABC devs have worked their butts off and done everything they said they would. The $eCash protocol is in excellent shape and ready for lift-off. I hope the world finds $XEC. Thanks to @DigitalGoldTalk for their incredible efforts. e.cash

"- I myself was not aware (and I am an internationally recognized cryptocurrency expert) that Amaury had changed the name of his BitcoinABC project, to XEC" > Well, this is exactly why it sounds lame. Either you are incompetent or you aren't telling the truth. Which one is it?

I had plenty of things to say -- but apparently Amaury did not want to discuss Some of them were: 1. This is all a moot point, because XEC is going to $0, no matter what name I pick for the Drivechain-Supercoin 2. Amaury *declined* to claim the eCash name - He could have bought the ".com" in 2021, or 2025 (when I bought it) -- but he did not - Everyone knows it is crazy to launch an internet project, and not buy the ".com" - I messaged Amaury privately, months ago, after I got ecash.com domain, after someone told me about the namespace collision -- Amaury read my message, and said nothing. He could have offered to buy the domain from me, then and there. But he did not say anything -- so I assumed he was not concerned about two projects sharing the name. 3. XEC is actually pulling the affinity scam.. on me! - My project is huge, huge news -- the announcement got nearly 10 million views - Top people from BTC, BCH, XMR, BSV involved, etc - I could not care less about the "XEC community" 4. "eCash" is a very generic name - David Chaum, Cashu, Fedimint, etc .. eGold - Putting "e" in front of something is also generic ... eMail , eCommerce, eSports, eCigarettes, eBook ... eFile , eVerify , ... eTrade , - Milton Friedman's quote "a reliable eCash" -- ie, it is a category of thing - Some cryptos have novel names ("Ethereum"), others are named after a real English word ("Dash"). This is the risk you run, if you pick a generic name. (And if you don't get the .com) 5. Being ranked #165 , is proof that XEC is not used in commerce - BTC is barely used in commerce ... let alone ETH, Aptos, BSV, etc - No one on Earth, can even name the cryptos 1 through 65 , let alone 1-165 - Even your #165 rank is heavily inflated, being a fork of a fork of a fork, most of the supply is held by people, who value the XEC so little, that they cannot even be bothered to claim it. So true supply is 1/100 th. - I myself was not aware (and I am an internationally recognized cryptocurrency expert) that Amaury had changed the name of his BitcoinABC project, to XEC - XEC bagholders are speculators, not users - The public today thinks (mistakenly) that all cryptos are scams, anyway 6. Your unhinged defensive reaction ... is also proof that you have a dead project - If you had a good project, you would not be so defensive - your "monopoly" on the name, is >50% of your whole project's value 7. Amaury himself created "Bitcoin Cash", the ultimate brand-confusing coin - To this day, people are confused about the different between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash - Back then, Bitcoin was (and remains) the #1 cryptocurrency and #1 brand ; 90% dominance on coinmarketcap, 1st and oldest cryptocurrency, etc - He can apparently call it "Bitcoin Cash" , but he has some kind of problem with "eCash .com" I was happy to discuss these points, but apparently the did not want to listen

BTC is a bastardization of Bitcoin. Co-opted & hijacked. Epstein funded. BCH continued Satoshi’s design in 2017 until BitcoinABC decided to change the design in 2018. BSV continued Satoshi’s design Nov 15, 2018 increasing block size limit & re-enabling Satoshi op-codes.

Rubbish. BTC is a bastardization of Bitcoin. Co-opted & hijacked. Epstein funded. BCH continued Satoshi’s design in 2017 until BitcoinABC decided to change the design in 2018. BSV continued Satoshi’s design Nov15, 2018 increasing block size limit & re-enabling Satoshi op-codes.

Nobody is talking about $XEC. 20 TRILLION coins. Bitcoin's DNA. 2-second finality. Market cap still under $150M. This is the most undervalued Bitcoin fork alive. @eCashOfficial @BitcoinABC #XEC #eCash #Altcoins #CryptoTwitter

I do not know who owns @eCash Below is a message I sent to Amaury weeks ago He read it, got the double check ✅✅ and he never complained at all -- not once So, if he is acting like this is some kind of surprise and betrayal, then he is totally lying to you. He knew about this for weeks and said nothing at all. If he loves eCash so much, why didn't get get the .com ? Or any other XEC-er ? You guys should just change the name back to BitcoinABC . Sorry but it's the truth.

Successful upgrade achieved. We moved our infrastructure to Bitcoin ABC 0.33.0, rebuilt Chronik from scratch, restored sync, and brought our explorer back online. Endpoint is live again: chronik.xolosarmy.xyz⁠� This is what sovereign infrastructure looks like. ⚡🐾 #eCash #Chronik #BitcoinABC #xolosArmy

Our node at chronik.xolosarmy.xyz is currently being upgraded to Bitcoin ABC v0.33.x. During this process, only Tonalli Wallet remains operational. Teyolia and Xolos Explorer are temporarily paused until the update is fully completed. Thank you for your patience as we strengthen the sovereign infrastructure of xolosArmy Network. ⚡🐕 #eCash #BitcoinABC #xolosArmy #TonalliWallet xolosArmy.xyz

that's why BitcoinABC launched $XEC $eCash

June 14, 2017: A CRAZY Move from Bitmain Crashing Price w/ plan to Hard Fork called #BitcoinABC executed early Aug under conditions: 1. WegWit2x & Bip91 don't activate before Aug 1 2. UASF Bip148 has enough Hansrate to endanger Legacy Chain youtube.com/watch?v=bdgdiBUU…

REMINDER: Roger Ver in 2018 announces BitcoinABC changes to Satoshi’s transaction ordering rule enforcing CTOR for BCH while BitcoinSV upgrades to 128MB block size increase with re-enabled Satoshi op-codes. BSV has since recorded 4GB blocks in 2022.

Wait till you find out about the time BitcoinABC changed Satoshi’s transaction ordering rule enforcing CTOR, kept blocks at 32MB & liaised with exchanges to keep the BCH ticker.

Roger Ver walked away from Bitcoin in 2018 when he sided with BitcoinABC changing Satoshi’s design & not scaling beyond 32MB.

Then look into 2018 BCH hard-fork upgrade where BitcoinABC changed Satoshi’s transaction ordering rule & refused to increase block size. BitcoinSV increased block size to 128MB & re-enabled Satoshi op-codes.

In 2017 BitcoinABC upgraded to 8 MB blocks. In 2018 BitcoinSV upgraded to 128MB. 4GB blocks recorded in 2022. #Technology #Blockchain #Money

2018, BitcoinABC changed Satoshi’s design just as BitcoinCore did in 2017 & kept block size at 32MB. BitcoinSV continued re-enabling Satoshi op-codes & increasing block size to 128MB. Since then BSV has achieved 4GB blocks, 1M tps on TeraNode & over 6.9B transactions in total.

They are using the narrative of Amaury Sechet and BitcoinABC in the development of eCash $XEC.

He still don't know what he's looking for is now @eCash $XEC. On Bitcoin Cash community there were two main figures: Amaury Sechet and Roger Ver. Ver lost trust and, since Nov 2020, Sechet and BitcoinABC continue the project as eCash $XEC, by forking Bitcoin Cash. Got it?

Look who is pumping the dead hard fork. The Bitcoin Cash community has a lot to thank BitcoinABC and Amaury Sechet for. Since Nov 2020, they continue the project on @eCash $XEC