Great article! You may find the #CCSLadder 🪜 we recently published with fellow NGO @E3G worthwhile on the prioritisation and focus on industrial 🏭 decarbonisation you suggest:

🪜 The #CCSLadder was launched last week, unpacking the nuanced understanding of the Carbon Capture and Storage applications in Europe. The tool assesses the climate value of #CCS apps for 2030 & 2050. Read our briefing and methodology here 👇 e3g.org/publications/carbon-…

If you grew up with the waste hierarchy, liked the Hydrogen ladder, you are gonna love this #CCSladder

Zusammen mit @e3g habe ich mit meinem Team von @Bellona_De & @Bellona_EU mit der #CCSLadder eine Einordnung des Klimanutzens von verschiedenen CCS-Anwendungen erarbeitet – für die Zeitpunkte 2030 und 2050. de.bellona.org/publication/c…

6/ A policy framework based on a robust set of guiding principles & safeguards is required (e3g.org/publications/making-…) This framework should prioritise ‘high-value’ #CCS applications. In this context, a #CCSladder may be useful to target and accelerate policy and action.

1/ Excited to finally share the #CCSLadder– by @E3G @Bellona_DE, w/ @GeorgKobiela & others! Drawing on colleagues' long-standing thinking, it aims to inform how public policy can prioritise ‘high climate-value’ #CCS applications 🧵 bellona.org/publication/carb… #CCS4NetZeroIndustry

💡I'm sure many of you have heard of the H2 ladder; my colleagues have just developed a much-needed comprehensive rating of priority CCS applications! #CCSladder

There we go, our #CCSLadder is out and will hopefully help to bring nuance to the debate. Even though I'm not part of either E3G or Bellona, I'm proud to have coauthored this.

It's finally out! After a lot of loops and input from plenty of smart and climate ambitious people, here it is: our multi criteria #CCSLadder. Domien already described it that neatly, so check his thread and the link!

The #HydrogenLadder is metastasizing! Check out this #CCSLadder by @e3g and @Bellona_DE!

Onto the #CCSladder itself We propose a methodological framework to assess applications across four criteria: 1) competition from alternative technologies; 2) mitigation potential; 3) feasibility; 4) CO2 source. We did this for 24 applications for both 2030 and 2050 7/11

This requires a policy framework based on a robust set of guiding principles and safeguards, prioritising 'high-value' CCS applications. e3g.org/publications/making-… In this context, a #CCSLadder can be useful, as we have seen in the #hydrogen debate. 6/11

Excited to finally share the #CCSLadder– joint @E3G @Bellona_DE work, with @GeorgKobiela and others Drawing on colleagues' long-standing thinking, it aims to inform how public policy (⏲️💰🏗️) can prioritise what we call ‘high climate-value’ CCS applications. A thread: 1/11

Not all #CCS is the same! @e3g & @Bellona_De have built a #CCSLadder 🪜 assessing the climate value of different applications. It shows: 📉 Low & decreasing value in power sector ⚙️ Highest value in #industry sectors w/ considerable process emissions 👇 e3g.org/publications/carbon-…