Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @archon
This. I also think verisimilitude leads to codification.
1
4
The evidence is in the codification of Democrat sponsored election laws since 2009. They've created an unfair election process with partisan legislation. It may not be fraud but it is unfair and discriminatory.
2
Which “concerns” are outlined Doug?? Or is it just the same old moribund nonsense from every minority group grifting from the taxes of working Canadian families? The Kelowna Pride press release is another pompous diatribe from yet more misguided Canadians. The truth is that there are no “first nations”. This is a term foisted upon myriads of ethnic clans which never were, and never will, be nations at all. UNDRIP is a lunacy - largely drafted by Canadian activitists - and considered inappropriate for codification even by Jody Wilson Rayboud! Canada and BC are the only two jurisdictions on Earth to codify this idiocy and everyone else is watching the debacle unfold. The hypocrisy of opposing, for example, Albertan separatism, whilst supporting indigenous separatism is a stark. The indian tribes have perhaps become little more than an all singing, all dancing front for a combination for greedy “chiefs”, oligarchical grifters and ideological zealots. The very idea that the PM of Canada is carrying out “nation to nation” negotiations with, for example, this guy, is ridiculous.
1
1
53
Replying to @Dallas_Brodie
The Kelowna Pride press release is another pompous diatribe from yet more misguided Canadians. The truth is that there are no “first nations”. This is a term foisted upon myriads of ethnic clans which never were, and never will, be nations at all. UNDRIP is a lunacy - largely drafted by Canadian activitists - and considered inappropriate for codification even by Jody Wilson Rayboud! Canada and BC are the only two jurisdictions on Earth to codify this idiocy and everyone else is watching the debacle unfold. The hypocrisy of opposing, for example, Albertan separatism, whilst supporting indigenous separatism is a stark. The indian tribes have perhaps become little more than an all singing, all dancing front for a combination for greedy “chiefs”, oligarchical grifters and ideological zealots. The very idea that the PM of Canada is carrying out “nation to nation” negotiations with, for example, this guy, is ridiculous.
2
4
50
Replying to @jessecmccormick
It’s a pompous press release from yet more misguided Canadians. The truth is that there are no “first nations”. This is a term foisted upon myriads of little ethnic clans which never were, and never will, be nations at all. UNDRIP is a lunacy - largely drafted by Canadian activitists - and considers inappropriate for codification even by Jody Wilson Rayboud! Canada and BC are the only two jurisdictions on Earth to codify this idiocy and everyone else is watching the debacle unfold. The hypocrisy of opposing, for example, Albertan separatism, whilst supporting indigenous separatism is a stark. The indians have become little more than an all singing, all dancing front for a combination for greedy “chiefs”, oligarchical grifters and ideological zealots. The very idea that the PM of Canada is carrying out “nation to nation” negotiations with, for example, this guy, is ridiculous.
1
1
7
92
In the midst of Donald Trump's Discombobulator, from Venezuela to Iran, I would argue that the Sovereign Signal has never been more clear to those with the eyes to see it. Especially the True Enemy. So, if we agree broadly on what the Sovereign Alliance stands against, what does it stand for? Well, I believe the answer to that question is itself another in a cascade of what I refer to as Perfect Paradoxes in the Info War, one that mirrors an idealized form of what the Truth Community could have been, should have been and perhaps once was. The Sovereign Alliance is a Decentralized Collective, in keeping with Man’s nature and God’s design. And while I have and will again explore this macro concept in greater detail when it comes to the Info War and our role in it, in the context of the Sovereign Alliance, it can be boiled down into one First Principle from which all of said alliance’s actions radiate: Each to himself BEFORE another … but not AGAINST another. Cooperative Competition. Mutual Accelerationism. Regions of Responsibility. Strategic Friendship. Sovereign Radiation. THAT is what the Sovereign Alliance stands FOR, in my estimation. But then, who’s in it? Well, certainly many names operate on the periphery, and some are quite vital to the connective tissue of the world being constructed through the aforementioned deconstruction. From Saudi Arabia to North Korea, Venezuela to Syria. And even leaders of industry and of culture who do not stand at the head of nations, and yet, who are helping to lead them out of the darkness and into the light, often against the wishes of their would-be peers, the Sovereign Alliance is as exclusive in origin as it is expansive in projected endgame, as MUST be the case for it to have any long-term value in keeping with those it extolls and hopes to radiate writ large across the battlespace. And each player has his own role to play in the mesh. But the core vision of my framing (and naming) of the Sovereign Alliance has ever and always come down to three names. Three pairs. A Trinity and a triangle, the strongest shape. And now, as we’ll explore herein, the coordination, commitment and codification of that Trinity is upon us, and by the very System they mean to destroy. And while one pairing herein began my research and writing in the Info War, a second pairing has been accelerating of late, becoming increasingly-apparent not just to the so-called Truth Community, but even more so to those who the Sovereign Alliance seeks to bring down. Which was itself a response to the third pairing, and the one that was always going to bring the convergence into the light of the awakening. The Sovereign Signal is no longer subtle. It is no longer deniable. And the Invisible Enemy is more starkly aware of this eventuality than even many in a community built on the idea of Trump standing at the head of a patriot plan to liberate the world. He is not alone in doing so. My latest. burningbright.substack.com/p…
1
29
73
1,038
Replying to @LoftusSteve
Intent is a legal variable. If the component cant be proved then the legal codification changes. I make no claim in this case. But it could hypothetically change the outcome.
1
Replying to @JDunlap1974
100 % ! Wish we had such 🐘 CONGRESSIONAL Leaders! What 🐘 GOP could DO if 🦏Thune was on 🐘 Team instead of Obstructing! Senate 🦏 w/TDS CON’t to OBSTRUCT SAVE ACT, DJT Appts, 🐘Agenda, Codification of 2024 🗳️! 🫏 Oppose, Expected! 🦏 who OPPOSE 🐘 Agenda is ODIOUS, VILE! 👎
6
(Quant à l'affirmation selon laquelle « les savants n'ont pas rendu obligatoire l'adhésion à une école », cela remonte à une époque antérieure à la codification et à l'établissement des écoles.) Tuhfat al-Muhtai fi Sharh al-Minhaj, Kitab-Zakah 12/491
1
57
Replying to @elonmusk
SPACE X is not connecting financial price could end up with no codification. Like I said to EFF on Whatsapp we should engage or work with government departments, means global interest on the map. Not kind of blood cells means no guarantee of government or where network
1
3
14
Worth resharing as this thread might be the defining truth about our demise, without the Save Act and Codification of executive orders preventing this to continue!
🧵 THREAD: You've heard the phrase "OUR DEMOCRACY" a million times. But what exactly is "OUR DEMOCRACY"? 🤔 When they say "democracy," they don't mean a republic. They don't mean consent of the governed. They don't mean your right to choose your own leaders. They mean a system where "institutions" - NGOs, multilaterals, the permanent bureaucracy - advance a set of values they consider settled: equality, social justice, cosmopolitanism, global governance. These values aren't proposals to be voted on. They're treated as moral prerequisites that must be true *before* your vote counts. Despite what they say, they aren't for checks and balances. Checks and balances limit what government can do to you. This limits what you can do to *them*. The brakes are on accountability, not power. The institutions that set the boundaries of acceptable policy have put themselves beyond the reach of the electorate, and they call that arrangement "democracy." Trump has been an existential threat to this system since the moment he said "drain the swamp" ... because the swamp IS the system. When he threatened those institutions, he didn't threaten the republic. He threatened their immunity from it. And they said so. On camera. At their own events. In their own words. As always, patience as I pull together the thread.👇
1
6
The space between them has a name. The CODIFICATION GAP. The distance between what you know and what others can find, understand, and reference. Your knowledge is real. It just has no portable form.
1
How useful it is to read books, depends also on the domains of knowledge a book is covering. Codification: How much of the domain's knowledge can be written down. High codification (e.g. mathematics) means books capture most of what matters. Low codification (e.g. entrepreneurship) means much knowledge resists being put into words. Feedback Speed: How quickly you find out if a decision was right or wrong. Fast feedback (e.g. cooking) lets you learn by trial and error. Slow feedback (e.g. investing) means mistakes may take years to reveal themselves — making books more valuable as a shortcut. Locality: How much knowledge depends on local context. High locality (e.g. local politics) means general books help less. Low locality (e.g. physics) means universal principles apply everywhere. Error Cost: How expensive mistakes are. High error cost (e.g. surgery, war) means you cannot afford to learn by doing alone — books and vicarious experience become essential. Temporal Relevance: Whether past knowledge remains relevant. Some domains change slowly (e.g. human nature, philosophy) making old books invaluable. Others change rapidly (e.g. technology) where older books lose relevance.
1
17
Partager son style de vie est la surface, derrière il y a malheureusement une codification de l’introversion qui se fait et une idéalisation de ce qu’est être introverti (un peu comme si on présentait la vie d’extraverti comme le fait de faire la fête tout le temps et parler très fort)
1
37
#PaulWestwood,#investor #investments not Farm or Land🇿🇼 Untold Story Behind Temba Mliswa His Journey to🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 In an exclusive&deeply revealing conversation,I sat down with Paul Westwood,a man whose name has long hovered at the intersection of business,politics&controversy in🇿🇼. For years,whispers circulated about his conflict with outspoken politician #TembaMliswa, yet few understood the emotional,professional&personal toll that saga took on him. Today, Westwood lives quietly in🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 thousands of kilometres away from the🇿🇼he once called home but the story of how he got there is neither simple nor forgettable. When I met Paul,he carried an air of someone who had survived a storm. Calm,reflective& cautious with his words,he agreed to walk me through the journey that forced him to uproot his life. “It wasn’t just a disagreement,” he told me. “It became a battle for my dignity,my safety,my🇧🇪wife's safety, our 2🇪🇺boys&our future.”🚩 Our discussion centred on his long-running dispute with Temba #Mliswa, a feud that escalated far beyond boardroom clashes. Westwood recounted how what started as a business dispute slowly turned into a public confrontation. Accusations, counter-accusations& intense Zanu-PF🇿🇼political pressure! 🇿🇼Minister of State for Presidential Affairs&National Security Zanu-PF Secretary #DidymusMutasa attached to Office of (President R.G.Mugabe) contravened Sec: 184 1 Criminal Law (Codification&Reform) Act🇿🇼Defeat/Obstruct course #justice amplified son #MartinMutasa nephew #TembaMliswa leverage over🇿🇼Court &🇿🇼Police denying PaulWestwood his constitutional #right #justice violations Sec: 69 (2) #Constitution According to Paul,the conflict: •damaged his business reputation, •strained his relationships, •placed him directly in the crosshairs of political hostility. He described moments when he felt cornered not just economically but physically. “I realised that no matter how loud I spoke,no matter how clear my #WestwoodsCase🇿🇼 was, the previous🇿🇼Govt simply was not going to protect me,”🏛🇿🇼The tension reached a point where, according to Westwood, remaining in🇿🇼became a risk no reasonable person would take.#Mliswa #threats Rape🇧🇪wife kidnap🇪🇺sons&Kill #PaulWestwood Late-night calls,harassment, intimidation,constant anxiety & the emotional fatigue of being dragged into a public battle he felt was bigger than him. “You reach a moment when you say enough is enough. My peace&my family are worth more than a never-ending fight,”When asked why he chose🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿Paul’s answer was simple, “I needed stability. I needed a place where I could rebuild without fear.” He found in🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿: •safety, •a functioning legal system, •the anonymity to start afresh. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿,he reclaimed what conflict had taken from him the right to live freely, work peacefully,heal&seek redress🆘️ This is not merely a story of 2 individuals clashing. It is a reflection of: •how politics can affect ordinary lives, •how power struggles can affect ordinary lives, •how business disputes can become political weapons, •how some🇿🇼feel compelled to leave 🇿🇼to find justice or peace. Paul Westwood’s departure is a true reflection how unresolved conflicts, when entangled with politics,rarely end cleanly. A Final Word from Paul Before we concluded, Paul said something that stayed with me: “I didn’t leave because I wanted to🛑 #investments in🇿🇼. I left because I wanted to survive🆘️One day, maybe, I will come back but only when the country allows people like me to breathe again.”🚩 My meeting with Paul Westwood exposed the cost of being caught in the crossfire between "political influence&personal #rights" Whatever one’s view of the dispute, the human story is undeniable,a man forced to leave his home to reclaim his peace. His🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿Journey is not only a relocation, it's a testimony to how power,conflict &survival intersect in modern🇿🇼 #PaulWestwood needs the🇿🇼Govt support,we need to look at his story. #Justice Engineer #JacobKudzayiMutisi
1
2
3
690
The "Anti-Patriotic Act" in Zimbabwe officially refers to the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Amendment Act of 2023 (often called the "Patriotic Bill"). It makes "wilfully injuring the sovereignty and national interest of Zimbabwe" a crime.
237
Replying to @Nickisbackbaby
All morality, throughout human history, is local. It’s a result of the culture of the local people who live there. Formal codification is recent - the last 4000-5000 years. Holy books are a result of local cultural norms. No gods needed.
2
14
Lorsque la loi se suffit à elle-même, elle cesse d’être ordonnée au vrai pour devenir une codification de la force sans violence visible. Elle ne reconnaît plus des sujets : elle distribue des statuts. Et si la dignité n’est qu’un statut, elle devient réversible. @sergyl_lafont
1
7
Replying to @SoucivaMA
Mereruka mastaba, Saqqara, 6th Dynasty. Those wrestling registers are remarkable. The 'Greco-Roman' label is a 19th century French codification, not a claim about ancient origin.
51
Maybe you missed the point, but she is not a fighter pilot. And it's a Japanese game, of course it will have some heavy j-pop culture codification.
23