Midcentury-modernists understood the difference between Model# (identity and positioning) and SKU/PN# (inventory and disambiguation). In certain light, this is interface design. Latest gaming monitors and their Model#s are shown below. The SKU# became the Model# due to number of reasons but most likely SEO at the expense of everything else. It's interesting to see the friction this causes -- browse gaming forums and the laborious enunciation of full model#s in gaming monitor reviews. Sony falls in this camp as well (WH-1000XM6 headphones). The other end of the spectrum is also equally dysfunctional. Macbook 14" Pro means absolutely nothing except for the general physical size and tier. Which one? Late-2021 or Mid-2023 or Early-2025? Apple does have a SKU#, e.g. MLW394LR/3 but it's buried deep. It'd take quite an effort to find one on your device. The broad category distinction of the Model# is also generic: <None>, Pro, Max, Ultra, etc. "Is it pro or non-pro!??", the process of disambiguation so janky. In stark contrast we have IBM Model 5250. The literal word "Model" is an explicit signifier what is about to follow. Medium granularity, sufficient disambiguation to distinguish from say previous generation 5150. Additional prefixes and postfixes can be added such as IBM Model K-5250X. IBM also had a large hierarchy of SKU#/PN# : Machine type (2065-I), Feature Code (FC7920), PN# (1520510), Software Code (5734-XC6), etc. These would not be hidden from the customer, but prominently displayed outside of marketing contexts for engineers to disambiguate and keep inventory. I think the modern AMD EPYC server chip naming is excellent: 9554 vs 9555, last digit is the generation which has pros/cons for sorting but they must have a reason to put the generation number at the end; perhaps to inventory all 64-core server CPUs, they'd would be grouped together by corecount. There is also an OEM and Retail PN# such as 100-5000328WOF. Anyways, it is quite interesting to see the marketing people following each other in a particular subindustry (gaming monitors).

Quite amazing what you can do with small pc's now. Loved using devices like this since the original pi Yes we all love towers with 5090gpus and insane cpu corecount/clockspeed but for a good 80% of what anyone does its not really needed

Have a feeling that reviews for Zen5 Epyc will be just as ecstatic as Zen5 Ryzen reviews are underwhelming. On the server side more memory bandwidth, avx512 making difference in AI inference workloads and power efficiency helping out on huge corecount skus.

We carry out monthly #WetlandBirdSurveys at Thornwood Common LNR. In January we broke the long standing #Snipe highest count record with 13 birds. Last week for the February #CoreCount, we broke that record with 25!!! (Snipe photo credit: Steve Smith.) @WeBS_UK @eppingforestdc

I think you messed up with the second M1 Max Corecount right?

Profis kombinieren das natürlich noch mit sleep 100; # reduce slightly, if necessary to convince somebody you improved the code und if wantfasterlaptop == true; then corecount=1; fi

No I also mean bandwidth whise, it is clear AMD approach is just better for corecount, but such a huge and complex interposer must have a comparable huge advantage in latency and bandwidth or it's just pointless.

Grimwith Reservoir - a stunning @WeBS_UK site looking for a local vol to count waterbirds on #corecount Sundays. Widgeon, Red Kite, Fieldfare & geese y’day. #Yorkshire @nybirdnews @Britnatureguide @RSPBScience @BTO_GBW #Winterwatch #TwitterNatureCommunity #Birds #citizenscience

Class act. Colorado and America deserve Adam Frisch at the helm. #CORecount

Raptorlake mobile might also have a undervolted 13900k die (24C32T) as HX model to compete high corecount zen4 mobile part, 13900k at 65 watts is on par 12900k max perf, imagine 13900k at 120 watts, will comfortably beat 12900ks desktop.

next gen ryzen has better ipc and clocks and corecount isn’t a big factor for most games as long as you have 6

Corecount? More like literal greatest of all time human being!

We owe #TinaPeters an apology. She grifted her marks for $250K & gained FOUR new votes in #CORecount: $62,500 a vote. Turns out Tina Peters gained THIRTEEN votes! So only $19,230.69 a vote. Now it makes sense. 🥳 Pay to count them again, Tina! #copolitics cpr.org/2022/08/04/tina-pete…

That's ackchually quite disreshpectful corecount! Things like bans on tbagging help things like sportsmanship shine within the esports world when it needs it most!

GOD COACH CORECOUNT!

One thing I want to say is that the BW issue maybe isn't as severe as it sounds on the surface given the pro cards perform basically on par iso-corecount as GeForce while having 16Gbps G6. Part of it is cuz the core has more power budget thanks to lower power memory though.

WHY AM I NOT BEFORE CORECOUNT

PHOEBUS. BIG W

@CoreCount_ i see you 👀

cargos is back 💪🏻