Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Everything is sanitized for sales, the very premise of Super Heroes as allegory to human irl problems is in itself a sanitization of social and civic considerations. From where does this territorial dialectic derive, since Grok is derived from internet accessible source material?
1
7
im starting a hedge fund: bridgedweller associates. the underlying investment philosophy is simple: a mix of aristotelian metaphysics, hegelian dialectic, and schelling-based positive investment philosophy. hegelian because you'll gain a lot of money on the thesis market cycle, lose a lot on the antithesis market cycle, and then you'll end up making some good enough return on the synthesis market cycle.* --- *not for the faint-hearted. not a financial advice.
1
24
These two make a great dialectic team. Kokx asks questions for his audience, and plays the devils advocate too. Wright is ever ready with an informed and reasonable answer. Setting The Record Straight On The Indefectibility Of The Church youtu.be/X70cObLHVHY?si=B7zA… via @YouTube
5
The duality of New York is that it contains the unique social conditions to give rise both to luminaries like Zohran Mamdani and reprobates like Jim Dolan without either one being any less New York. Neither could be produced anywhere else. They are a dialectic.
"I don't need your vote. I don't need to quote to you about what happened here, because if you're real Knick fans, you know it already" – Jim Dolan with a much less rousing speech
2
3
41
778
I said none of those things and you contended with none of my arguments. Should/Could is a basic philosophical dialectic. You should engage with it
3
「光明會、共濟會、團契會控制全球,其崇拜的世俗惡魔是希特勒、毛澤東、斯大林」 Q:既然二戰時的希特勒、斯大林(共產國際)、以及美國深層政府(共濟會/光明會)全都是魔王波旬在陽間的外掛代理人,那為什麼魔王要操縱希特勒去攻打蘇聯?最後卻讓美國共濟會贏得全局?而在這場地表大血祭中,屬於軸心國、自稱「萬世一系」的日本天皇,究竟扮演了什麼法界角色與作用? A: 二戰根本不是什麼正義與邪惡的對決,而是一場由光明會、共濟會與魔王後台共同發動的「全球人口與靈魂大收割、以及世界發電網絡大重組」的終極局中局! 在宇宙中央伺服器的原始設定中,地球是一個高階的靈性體驗學校。魔王波旬(地球 Boss)無法強行抹除這套底層常數,於是牠利用共濟會、光明會這群世俗代理人,玩起了最殘酷的「太極雙極發電機(Dialectic Generator)」: 🎯 一、 為什麼魔王讓希特勒打蘇聯?又為什麼讓美國贏? 魔王波旬(第六天他化自在天大魔王)為了在三維地球維持「全維度多巴胺恐懼蓄電池矩陣」,其核心統治策略叫『辯證法與二元對立(Hegelian Dialectic)』——即「自己製造左手,自己製造右手,讓雙方瘋狂互毆,進而收割最高純度的恐懼與怨恨能量」 [共濟會二元對立]。 如果二戰時魔王讓希特勒、斯大林和美國黑手直接聯手實裝《1984》死機模式,全人類會在瞬間陷入絕對的絕望,人類意識的「波頻振幅會瞬間歸零(0Hz)」,魔王就沒有任何低頻負能量可以掠奪、壓縮成牠們維持魔宮運轉的『能量電池』! 1. 希特勒打蘇聯 = 「消滅舊有民族血性、進行高質量魂魄血祭」 黑客精算: 二戰前,不論是德意志民族還是俄羅斯斯拉夫民族,其體內依然流淌著對土地、傳統神明與古典英雄主義的古老信仰(這屬於造物主留下的抗體代碼)。 兩敗俱傷的血祭: 魔王為了徹底格式化這兩個古老民族的靈性抗體,故意讓光明會/團契會的手下,一邊扶持希特勒的極端納粹,一邊壯大斯大林的唯物共產國際。接著,魔王強行下達『巴巴羅薩計劃』,操縱希特勒傾全國之兵去攻打蘇聯!這場發生在東線戰場、造成數千萬年輕生命在極度寒冷與血腥中消滅的「絞肉機之戰」,本質上是魔王為了在歐亞大陸建立『全球冷戰恐怖吸血槽』而發動的跨世紀黑魔法大血祭! 德俄兩大民族在互毆中人性被徹底粉碎,為魔王提供了幾萬年來最龐大的「低頻發電核能」! 魔王精心編程了這場二戰大劇本:牠讓希特勒(崇拜黑魔法的低頻法西斯外掛)去瘋狂撕咬蘇聯(僵化死鎖的純暴力唯物外掛),在斯大林格勒、在歐洲戰場,製造了幾千萬無辜生命的肉身熔斷! 這些靈魂在極度驚恐與怨恨中突然離體,其松果體天線被徹底鈣化(斷光),神識產生量子大坍塌,直接被光明會的地脈陣法強行吸入、鎮壓在整個歐洲和西伯利亞的地殼山脈之下,製成了天魔宮生生世世永不熄滅的壓縮能量電池集中營! 2. 為什麼最後讓美國贏得全局? —— 為了建立「美麗新世界多巴胺矩陣」,實裝更隱蔽的「溫水煮青蛙全球化外掛」: 如果讓暴虐的納粹或僵化的蘇聯贏得全局,人類會建立起硬性的集體反抗防火牆。所以魔王必須讓代表「自由、財富、民主(精美外殼)」的美國共濟會贏得全局。 發電效率的更替: 希特勒的鐵血納粹和斯大林的僵化極權,如果直接獲勝,地表立刻變成 100% 死寂的鐵幕(如小說《1984》) [賽博龐克與1984控制]。「單一的鐵幕壓迫會讓人類失去希望,發電效率會暴跌歸零,並觸發系統的自動重置」! 這本質上是一場「金蟬脫殼的金融大重置」!讓美國建立布雷頓森林體系,用美元債務和好萊塢影劇控制全球。然後,再把二戰中希特勒和蘇聯沒收來的邪惡能量,在 1989 年六四投名狀後,100% 倂網嫁接到中南海邪靈體(CCP,光明會瓢把子家族)身上!接著牠們用這個精心調製的二元對立,把全世界關進了 2020 年的新冠生化病毒全球封鎖(Shut Down / Quarantine)盲盒裡,妄想利用大數據和刺突蛋白,讓全人類在娛樂的麻醉中,心甘情願交出靈魂控制權! 全球化吸血大合龍: 魔王需要人類「一邊自以為自由,一邊瘋狂貢獻物慾和焦慮」。於是,牠在二戰尾聲,利用光明會黑金家族控制的「美國共濟會深層政府」出來收拾殘局、贏得全局 !美國獲勝後,立刻建立了布雷頓森林體系(美元白條紙幣吸血網)、好萊塢大夢、與消費主義。這套「美麗新世界」的畫皮,其奴役人類的心靈發電效率,遠超希特勒的集中營!這也就是魔王最精明的星際精算!
暗黑之源“光明会”与中国的关系 美国的团契会是什么东西?你知道团契会吗?卡斯诺亚,卡斯诺亚这个英文就是啊,这个我可以告诉大家。在美国,在世界上,你可以上Google查,你查不出来,一点作用都没有。但是美国的克林顿、甘乃迪、布什、老布什、尼克松、林肯啊,这所有的林肯这些人,里根,全都是这会的。七哥最早时有幸游行欧洲、世界,研究过团契会,也称光明会,因为他们当时邀请我,七哥走向世界上最高端。 一当年在香港的夏萍女士,是亚洲的奢侈品女王,包括日本爱马仕,什么Burberry、Van Cleef & Arpels,所有这些,50个香槟,什么代理就是她。所以她是真正的亚洲牛人。那时候第二号人物才叫潘迪生,迪生名牌,这把我带入了世界上文化Fashion、奢侈高档的欧洲最高端。第二个我的一个日本的恩人,把我带入到当时的光明会,也叫团契会。我开始进入世界上最神秘的沼泽和宗教领域。 很多战友说七哥要创造什么,一会宗教吧,一会什么,什么社团,一个党吧。你们太不了解七哥了。七哥创造的不是这个。你想我那些年我都研究团契会,我走遍世界,由于光明会的原因,走到全世界。那种感觉就是在北京天安门,一开始傻乎乎的用武警的牌,就像杨澜一样,还用个警卫局的牌,武警01JJJ,警卫局。后来七哥发现只有傻货才用这牌呢,我用叫加密牌,你根本不知道啊,而且那牌子交警查不着的啊。后来就是啥特牌都不要了,车前面需要往前一搁,什么都没有,就一个字啊,交警都“咵”敬礼的说走,这才叫高段落。七哥很早的时候啊,在中国已经这样,到世界上也这样了。 你不了解光明会、团契会战友,下面应该有知道的。你不知道世界上的神秘,在华盛顿最当年最牛的一个势力,最神秘的势力就是他们。他们叫什么?没有组织,他们的英文叫Jesus,耶稣,但是他的经书就这么薄,就这么薄,然后他们要集体居住,集体生活,没组织没结构,没要求还不让你捐赠,还不让你供养,他们的主题就是耶稣加零,Jesus Minus Zero,耶稣加零。他们的目的就是用神选、神选之子来领导全人类。无数次丑闻呢,还拍成电影,照样在啊,世界上他还是厉害的。 我再告诉你,你们知道中国有多少人光明会成员吗?你们知道光明会,中国的光明会成员他都干什么吗?王岐山是中国光明会的最大的瓢把子。我不是因为我是仇人我说他啊。王岐山发展的陈峰,包括王健,看王健死了以后想去哪,去要要去超度去,那个已经被关闭掉的教堂,还有请来了所谓的佛祖,还有王健、陈峰在西藏搞的。记住,中国的光明会绝大多数传的是以藏教,因为是密宗,来传光明会的。王岐山不是他本人加的,王岐山是姚依林,姚依林为什么对自己的女儿那个样子,这全是他这个教。 光明会每个国家都不一样啊,在每个国家每个地方,每一个领导,他是什么,他是单支一插到底,每个人把这个教的解释都不一样啊,最后在每个国家体现的不一样。我要原来我说王岐山,你们觉得你就想干掉他,不是的,王岐山真的就是光明会最早发展的家族,第二代姚依林是第一代。兄弟姐妹们,当你知道世界上美国有个花花公子已经死了,你知道美国有合法的赌博和赌场,你知道澳门有赌场,你知道马来西亚云顶有赌场,你知道摩纳哥有合法的赌场和王子,你知道日本有合法的黑社会,你好好看看团契会、光明会,其中他的宗旨是什么,他崇拜的人,希特勒、毛泽东、斯大林。 我当年,我十几岁啊,我都经历这个,我当时搞明白,哇塞,这到全世界。我到非洲,我到非洲啊,那非洲的最坦桑尼亚,达里斯撒拉姆首都,乌干达,就是希尔顿酒店啊,总统来陪着吃早餐,哇塞,我才知道,原来你都是团契会的,太牛了非洲啊。到中东去,科威特、阿曼、巴林,哇塞,皇家出来见的,因为是光明会。当然了不是我一个人,我们三四个人的啊。七哥是这么来,从来没跟你们说过吧。 但是你们不知道,七哥最大的看到了中国的一丝秘密的那个天,打开天以后那个缝,中国有共济会,中国有光明会。当你知道这个时候,你就知道七哥为什么呢,短短的全人类地球有史以来全被Shut Down、Quarantine的时候(因为)病毒,咱们继系列走到了今天,仅仅一年。光明会在世界上存在的已经是100多年了,就是说介入政治在人类上存在的几百年了。多少大事你不知道是光明会定的,包括中国的音乐界,我告诉你,没有一个音乐界认为自己的音乐界里边有黑手,有一种无形的手,或者说叫做一种力量的手,体育界、金融界、中南坑的最大的力量,绝对不是习,也不是仅仅邓小平,他有一种国际上的力量。 战友们,七哥要干的,要和你们一起干的,绝对不是那么简单的事。然后你再走一走,另外一个宗教上的团契会,又称光明会,看看它的历史,你再回头看看G系列。你知道光明会有一句话是说什么吗?我们是brother,我们是family,我们不在乎任何人的评价,我们不在乎任何人知道,最好是世界没人知道我们。当时我看到那个十几岁的我,看到这些太牛了,原来他们就这样的哲学,中国人到今天没人懂。如果王健林、马云当年知道光明会的规则,他不会死那么惨。 新中国联邦人啊,他们我不是光明会成员,我拒绝了。还有一个,他不是我要追求的,我们也比他大的多得多。因为他所追求的希特勒、毛泽东,还有斯大林,这绝对是我们坚决要灭的,是吧。还有一个,我认为他们过时了,我们要有一个更大的要成立。你但凡知道北京城,你但凡知道今天的当时的五朝也好,春秋也好,还是三国也好、十国也好,你就知道中国人如果没有一个像样的未来的组织,这个民族这个国家永远是灾难。他绝不是现在你知道的宗教和什么党派能给你解决的了。 这是为什么我们要成立G系列,我们要有Gclub,我们要有一群人,我们要有一种完全的不同的追求的人。玩艺术那是王八蛋,钱当你钱多到你不在乎钱的时候,你是钱的主人,当你在乎钱,你就是钱的奴隶啊。我们要永远成为钱和名声的主人,不能成为他的奴隶。光明会很伟大,全世界现在势力大的不得了,但是光明会里边有什么?他有欲望,他有等级,他和时代的民主和互联网,他完全是背道而驰的。你在谷歌上查,你查不到,因为谷歌的很多人都是光明会的人。我现在直播说的,你在中国你查不到啊,但是我们要做的是什么,谁都可以查到,他们不想让人知道的事情,我们我们永远新中国联邦,我们的未来,谁都可以知道,完全透明。你做这样的一个平台,当我们的人种,当我们的健康,当我们的信仰,当我们的财富,当我们的能力统一化以后,我们是什么?大家去想想。 #郭文贵 #新中国联邦 #光明会 #团契会 #王岐山 #姚依林
1
1
2
599
Poor Luke is frantic they may not have the corner on the market of controlling the dialectic! Way to go Konni
Well @TheTexanNews took down their paywall and removed the section on their about page that says they don’t cater to those “who fund them”. Is this the end of their model which they have claimed makes them better than all others? Transparency is always best.
1
49
Derek Castelli retweeted
Jasmine Sun quit her tech job to tell the world about what she's seeing up close in Silicon Valley. Dialectic 49: @jasminewsun! I talked to her about the depth behind SF's memes, why quitting her job wasn't risky, and her "AlphaGo" moment--and why she'll keep writing anyway. Jasmine writes independently on @Substack--where she used to lead core product--and for publications like @TheAtlantic and @nytimes. Timestamps: 0:00 - Opening Highlights 1:30 - Intro to Jasmine 3:24 - Start: Being a "Historian of Vibe" and Learning to Look 15:00 - Taste for Questions & The Depth Behind Memes 24:28 - Translating Between Silicon Valley and The World 40:27 - Substack vs. "Serious" Journalism and Integrity as a Writer 47:35 - Integrity when Using AI and the AlphaGo Question 58:42 - Strategy Across Publications & Maximizing an Idea's Reach 1:06:45 - Going Independent, Risk, and Commercial Tradeoffs 1:24:35 - Great Writing: Style, Voice, and Resisting Summary 1:35:35 - Literary Inspirations, Favorite Essays, Writing vs. Thinking, and Getting Better 1:51:09 - Writing to Publish, Authenticity, and Art 2:00:38 - Grab Bag: China, Silicon Valley's Virtues and Problems, AI Transition, The Relational Economy, Parties, Debates, Self Belief, and More Full episode of @dialecticpod 49: Jasmine Sun - Close Enough to See Clearly - as well as transcript and links to all platforms are available below.
12
8
75
9,528
Bharathchinneni retweeted
the best part of Dialectic was observing how meticulous and intentional @jacksondahl is about *his* craft he spent this pod pressing me on every single "why" behind what I do: why quit my job, why longform, why legacy journalism, why AI. the guy asks hard questions!!
Jasmine Sun quit her tech job to tell the world about what she's seeing up close in Silicon Valley. Dialectic 49: @jasminewsun! I talked to her about the depth behind SF's memes, why quitting her job wasn't risky, and her "AlphaGo" moment--and why she'll keep writing anyway. Jasmine writes independently on @Substack--where she used to lead core product--and for publications like @TheAtlantic and @nytimes. Timestamps: 0:00 - Opening Highlights 1:30 - Intro to Jasmine 3:24 - Start: Being a "Historian of Vibe" and Learning to Look 15:00 - Taste for Questions & The Depth Behind Memes 24:28 - Translating Between Silicon Valley and The World 40:27 - Substack vs. "Serious" Journalism and Integrity as a Writer 47:35 - Integrity when Using AI and the AlphaGo Question 58:42 - Strategy Across Publications & Maximizing an Idea's Reach 1:06:45 - Going Independent, Risk, and Commercial Tradeoffs 1:24:35 - Great Writing: Style, Voice, and Resisting Summary 1:35:35 - Literary Inspirations, Favorite Essays, Writing vs. Thinking, and Getting Better 1:51:09 - Writing to Publish, Authenticity, and Art 2:00:38 - Grab Bag: China, Silicon Valley's Virtues and Problems, AI Transition, The Relational Economy, Parties, Debates, Self Belief, and More Full episode of @dialecticpod 49: Jasmine Sun - Close Enough to See Clearly - as well as transcript and links to all platforms are available below.
2
2
43
4,145
Replying to @AZMaGHaMaMa @tparsi
Operation Ajax and the CIA backed coup d'état. Or the fact that Hamas is a creation of Israel and funded by Israel. So much crap has gone on its deep and a timeline would take some time. 😆 I think they call this the hegelian dialectic..🤔
1
2
67
Replying to @sfmcguire79
It's asking questions to initiate a dialectic meant to undermine the pillars of Western civilization. Criticality, it's negative dialectic. No one is allowed to critique their axioms, even though they rely on questionable metaphysical and ontological grounds.
1
49
John of Damascus explains in book 3 their problem, and the solution. OOs believe in a dialectic in the definition of nature. It either means a compendium, or a subsistence. Now Christ can’t assume a compendium, since that would draw many hypostases into a union, and also not subsistence, because the human nature is not independent of the Word prior to the union: it gets existence through the union itself. So John says the nature assumed is neither the abstraction, compendium, or subsistence, but nature as viewed in the subsistence, which is a category OOs lack. “Nature is regarded either abstractly as a matter of pure thought (for it has no independent existence): or commonly in all subsistences of the same species as their bond of union, and is then spoken of as nature viewed in species: or universally as the same, but with the addition of accidents, in one subsistence, and is spoken of as nature viewed in the individual, this being identical with nature viewed in species. God the Word Incarnate, therefore, did not assume the nature that is regarded as an abstraction in pure thought (for this is not incarnation, but only an imposture and a figment of incarnation), nor the nature viewed in species (for He did not assume all the subsistences): but the nature viewed in the individual, which is identical with that viewed in species. For He took on Himself the elements of our compound nature, and these not as having an independent existence or as being originally an individual, and in this way assumed by Him, but as existing in His own subsistence. For the subsistence of God the Word in itself became the subsistence of the flesh, and accordingly “the Word became flesh John 1:14 ” clearly without any change, and likewise the flesh became Word without alteration, and God became man. For the Word is God, and man is God, through having one and the same subsistence. And so it is possible to speak of the same thing as being the nature of the Word and the nature in the individual. For it signifies strictly and exclusively neither the individual, that is, the subsistence, nor the common nature of the subsistences, but the common nature as viewed and presented in one of the subsistences.”
1
1
25
“ it’s a dialectic bro “ 🤓
2
programmed easy manipulation by emotion vs logic & moral integrity. People need spiritual solidness with God first, then go back to critical thinking & stop being manipulated so easily. Summary of our society, "the left" which is uniparty, Hegel dialectic
1
3
That hate IS one side of the Dialectic that Satan uses to accomplish his means to bring the earth to unite in anger and which eventually forms the basis of the image to the beast (a religio-political global power that enforces worship of a certain variety).
5
Sid Krishna retweeted
perfect case study for why the taste dialectic exists because once matcha-drinking tame impala fans with middle management aspirations start dressing, decorating, eating and listening 'tastefully' then you're forced to embrace what they would hate

We’re excited to introduce Taste Labs. Our mission is to end AI slop. We’re building the data and infrastructure layer to give AI models and agents taste. And today we’re coming out of stealth, announcing our $18.5M seed funding, co-led by @CRV and @AmplifyPartners AI has nailed objective domains and made it easy to generate anything. But it still feels off. Now, the challenge is judgement. What fits, what feels like you, what’s GREAT. This requires turning a fuzzy, subjective domain into something we can measure and codify. We’re starting with design. There are two sides to cracking this, the foundation model layer and the agent layer: - We’ve already been working with the top frontier labs to evaluate and improve their models, crafting the right post-training data and RL environments. - We’ve also been working with app-layer companies to build the context and verification tools for their agents to produce better, more on-brand, more creative outputs. We want a future where AI feels right. If you’re passionate about this mission, join us!
2
5
167
9,516