I am waiting for the name of at least one fighter that has a dircm as 101ks-o, only ddm ng, but this is not even close to dircm, the su57 has about 10 AESA antenna throughout the airframe, 5-6 of which are radars that cover 270-360 ° and the side radars have 404 trm

🇮🇳 India's homegrown attack helicopter is about to get its teeth The HELINA anti tank missile is completing validation on the ALH platform, with integration onto the LCH Prachand starting right after. Here is the roadmap taking shape 👇 • HELINA validation on ALH targeted for completion by April 2026 • Prachand integration and flight trials to follow in late 2026 or early 2027 • A fully indigenous EW suite with radar warning, laser warning and missile approach warning is set to be fielded within 6 months • DIRCM active countermeasures will be added later for protection against incoming missiles • Full combat ready Prachand with weapons and EW suite expected by 2028 The Prachand was built for high altitude warfare after lessons from Kargil. By 2028 it will not just fly in those mountains. It will fight and defend itself there too. 🇮🇳 An attack helicopter that sees threats coming and shoots first.

DIRCM for tanks, niceee

Il sistema MAIR (Leonardo) rileva il drone termicamente e ne calcola il vettore d'attacco. Il sistema DIRCM QUIRIS (ELT Group) punta un laser a cascata quantica sul sensore ottico del drone per accecarne la guida terminale.

Name me a fighter that has stealth, 360° maws, 360° dircm, 360° radars, internal compartments that hold 4 stealth cruise missiles, which can carry long-range missiles in the internal compartments even 4 pieces, has Irst, has lwr, 6 external suspensions except su57

Flares Vs DIRCM( Directed (Decoy) Infrared Counter Measurers) Aircraft infrared missile countermeasure

🇩🇪 dircm or medevac upgrades are not some unique exception and were post-entry-into-service mods. Airbus just highlights this specific version of the plane, just as there are 🇩🇪 and 🇪🇸 eurofighter at ILA. same plan, different national setups.

یک فروند پهپاد Heron MK II اسراییلی به وسیله موشک/پهپاد 358 در بقاع لبنان منهدم شد. حزب الله اشتباه می گوید که Heron-1 را زده. همچنان مشکل نبود اگاهی وضعیتی و DIRCM است که از پهپاد تلفات می گیرد،وزن یک اخلالگر mini Music ساخت البیت 19kg و توان مصرفی آن 1kW است.

Zumal die deutsche Variante mit anderer Ausstattung kommt als eine französische oder britische 400M, z.B. die DIRCM Integration statt DASS bei den Franzosen. Da zu unterscheiden was für eine Variante des A400M es ist ergibt schon Sinn.

"BriteStorm is designed to confuse the rather limited trackers built into a missile." Not exclusively - see StormShroud. Plus MAPPS can decoy radar-guided missiles with BriteCloud & IR-guided missiles with Miysis DIRCM.

"But they can't get away." They don't need to get away. If fitted with Leonardo BriteStorm (which can jam X-band fire control radars & also create ghost targets), combined with MAPPS with BriteCloud & Miysis DIRCM they'd be incredibly hard to detect & hit.

Agreed, most I can say is that all they really need is a DIRCM system and maybe look at ways to increase the speed at which you can unload and load them. I think that's the "survivability" package they need.

The high costs and bureaucratic hurdles associated with European projects are the biggest obstacles to their progress. Development processes also take too long. Furthermore, when tech share clashes among certain countries within consortia formed for joint development come into play, many strategic projects are effectively stillborn. There are examples from the past where attempts were made but failed to yield results. Rather than wasting time, we recommend taking a look at the Turkish business model and technology. The reason is that; While Europe’s 6th Generation MUM-T concept remains merely an idea on paper, Turkiye is currently actively flying with this capability In addition to the MUM-T concept, Turkiye is flying an unmanned fighter aircraft capable of independently performing SEAD, DEAD, CAS, CAP, and ISR missions, and is currently working on much more advanced and powerful new versions. Turkiye has also developed integrated EOTS and IRST systems—which, to my knowledge, only the US and China have operationalized—and flight tests are currently underway. Additionally, DIRCM and a 360° AESA radar system are planned for the KAAN. Europe has yet to produce a tangible product in this field. While the most powerful European turbofan generates 20,000 lb of thrust, the turbofan featuring single-crystal blade and blisk technology—which Turkiye plans to conduct its first test start(ignition) of this year—is being developed to produce 36,000–37,000 lb of thrust. In Europe, despite having far superior experience compared to Turkiye, the biggest obstacles for such programs are political will, cost, and bureaucracy. For example, the UK defense minister expressed his disappointment over the lack of an adequate defense budget a few days ago and subsequently resigned. This situation may affect the Tempest program as well. If there is no aircraft in short and medium term, there is no need for engines either, which is why the future of the engine projects that European engine manufacturers are working on is becoming unknown (FCAS) I believe that some European countries will set aside their prejudices and develop collaborations with Turkiye for joint development and production strategies in specific areas. These countries will be Europe’s winners in the medium and long term.

I'm curious what survivability actually means for an airlifter. Not something I've thought about, I always assumed the standard was "lol good luck if you get shot at." Is it just structure and systems redundancy? DIRCM, MAWS, ECM, etc?

Thought that light was a DIRCM for a second 😂

A Força Aérea Espanhola (EdAE - Ejército del Aire y del Espacio) e a Indra realizaram com sucesso voos de testes com um avião de transporte militar Airbus A400M equipado com o sistema antimísseis InShield DIRCM (Direct Infrared Countermeasures). buff.ly/YTXJcx6

-DIRCM -Comando y control -Simuladores de vuelo (líder mundial) -Guerra electrónica -Espacio no digamos barbaridades sobre Indra y lo que es "lo suyo". Precisamente se les dio el pilar de sensores que es exactamente a lo que se dedican.

Spiral Development: The Chosen Approach 4/25 The MoD adopted a “spiral development” model: deliver baseline capability quickly, then add enhancements iteratively. Initial jets offered modern efficiency and long range (4,750 nautical miles). Planned spirals included military registration, full RAF crewing, secure communications, military GPS (anti-jam/spoof), and defensive aids like DIRCM and chaff/flares. Full military capability was targeted around mid-2026.

POV: Iranian locals just scored a tech heist in the desert! 😂 A classified US C-130 DIRCM laser turret left behind is now desert decor. One guy even drops a cheeky "Halo Trump!" to the camera. 💀 Drop a 🔥 & tag a friend who needs this energy! #Iran #Geopolitics #Memes #USA

قضیه شاهد و آپاچی تو کَت من نمیره! هلیکوپتر آپاچی سیستم «دفاع نزدیک» نداره، یعنی مثل نسخه های مدرن تانک مرکاوا یا سیستمی که روی ناو‌شکن نصبه و خودش به صورت اتوماتیک پرتابه مهاجم رو شناسایی و خنثی میکنه عملاً در این هلیکوپتر وجود نداره. اما مجهز به یکی از خفن ترین سیستم‌های راداری (RAW) و سیستم هشدار موشکی (MWS) و سنسور هشدار لیزری و البته پرتابگر فلر و چف برای فریب رادار و فریب حرارتی پرتابه مهاجم هستش. جدای از همه اینها آپاچی مجهز به سیستم جمینگ بسیار پیشرفته و اخلالگر فروسرخ (DIRCM) و یه توپ ۳۰ م‌م بسیار دقیق با نرخ آتش ۶۲۵ گلوله در ۶۰ ثانیه است که میتونه گلوله های ۳۰ میلیمتری رو در عرض ۱.۲ ثانیه به هدفی در فاصله یک کیلومتری برسونه. خب… شاهد یه پهپاد انتحاریه که بیشتر برای اهداف ثابت استفاده میشه. نسخه های پیشرفته روسی تونستن در چندتا عملیات علیه قایق‌های متحرک اوکراینی هم استفاده بشن ولی ۹۹ درصد استفاده شاهد برای اهداف ثابت روی زمینه. تا جایی که میدونم برنامه پرتاب شاهد قبل از لانچ به سیستم داده میشه و سیستم هدایت آنلاین هم نداره. سرعت شاهد در بهترین حالت ۱۹۰ کیلومتر بر ساعت هستش. صدای بسیار بلند و گوش خراشی داره و به هیچ عنوان رادار‌گریز نیست. یعنی اپراتور تسلیحات آپاچی در فاجعه ترین حالت بعد از تشخیص راداری و فعال شدن سنسور های بالگرد حداقل ۸ تا ۱۲ دقیقه زمان برای دفع حمله شاهد داشته. خلبان هم ۸ تا ۱۲ دقیقه وقت برای تغییر جهت و مانور فرار و فلر زدن و … داشته. درواقع برای برخورد شاهد به آپاچی باید سلسله‌ای از اتفاقات و نقص‌های فنی و قصور اپراتور‌ و خلبان آپاچی و … پشت هم افتاده باشه. وگرنه این قضیه در حد یه معجزه‌ست! یا این اتفاق کلا نیوفتاده! یا اتفاق افتاده ولی تعمدی در کار بوده! هرچی که هست اصلا طبیعی نیست و راحت از کنارش رد شدن همه. به یاد کاربر تامکت که اگر بود حتما جوابی برای این مسئله داشت.