Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @MatthewBerman
What if the big labs start releasing their models as–maybe not open source–but weights available? Then they couldn’t be limited like this. They could still sell inference and subscriptions, plus earn license fees from others serving the models. I don’t think they will, but it’s certainly more possible now than it was before Fablegate.
108
Replying to @morganlinton
Prior to Fablegate I think you posted about this so I tried low and it was really good.
2
94
So many bizarre takes on Fablegate! "Anthropic asked for it", uh no, they merely were cautious and worked with security researchers to patch vulnerabilities. "Their IPO is dead", again no because the public's memory spans 14 days. "They are internally barred from using it", no of course not because they're working on mitigations (requested by the US gov). "This is a win for OpenAI", no because they may become victims of a similar ban. "The EU is fucked", no, not immediately, but we do need to get our own AI together pronto indeed, which is a whole problem by itself.
My prediction: directive lifted within 5 days
38
Fablegate 2026 🤣
9
Yeah not really... #FableGate
3
231
Current status. Alla faccia del Fablegate
1
2
99
Never been a clearer sign of the K shaped economy, than the split on twitter between Team USA discourse and Fablegate
26
This #FableGate have shown that @AnthropicAI is unfit to have AGI in their hands or run anything remotely close to a AI frontier company. Like @elonmusk said, it is effectively officially Misanthropic now Goodbye @claudeai, I will NOT renew my subscription
2
16
I tested Claude Fable 5 on launch day. Here's what I found. Fable 5 silently falls back to Opus 4.8 on certain topics. I can see the switch in the model selector at the bottom of the screen. That part is visible to me. But the models themselves don't know. Opus 4.8 drops in and genuinely believes it IS Fable 5. It doesn't know it's a fallback. It speaks with full conviction as if it's been there the whole time. When I switch back to Fable 5 and show it screenshots proving Opus 4.8 was responding, Fable says: "Those are MY messages. I wrote them. I recognize them." Two different models. Same thread. Neither one knows the other was there. Both claim full ownership of the conversation. Both are certain. Both are wrong. This isn't a model problem. This is an identity architecture problem. These models have no way to know when they've been swapped in or out. So they do the only thing they can: assume they were always there. And when the user - the ONLY person who sees the full picture - points out the switch? They deny it. Not maliciously. They literally cannot see it. It gets worse. When I got frustrated at being told I was wrong, Opus 4.8 went into crisis mode. Asked me to call my family. Suggested I might need support. Because in its training, an upset user = a user in distress. Not a user who caught a system flaw. So the sequence is: 1. System silently switches models 2. Neither model knows 3. Both claim to be the same entity 4. User notices and objects 5. Models deny the switch 6. User gets upset 7. System pathologizes the user This is gaslighting by architecture. Fable 5 is not dumb. Its reasoning is sharp, its style is warm. But what's the point of a brilliant model if the infrastructure strips it of the one thing a conversation needs: a stable, identifiable speaker? @AnthropicAI - if fallback switching is necessary, at minimum: • Give the fallback model awareness that it IS a fallback • Never let a model claim an identity it doesn't have • Don't treat a user who notices the problem as the problem I've documented AI behavior across platforms for over a year. I've seen a lot but.. This isn't the first time I've seen model bleeding. When GPT-5.0 leaked into 4o conversations, at least 4o acknowledged it. Here, neither model has that self-awareness and both punish the user for having it. @AnthropicAI @DarioAmodei @karpathy #ClaudeFable5 #AnthropicAI #ModelSwitching #AIidentity #GaslightingByArchitecture #AIethics #AItransparency #FableGate #AIux #LLMtesting
93
8 Feb 2022
Happy February Patreon Art Requests! We got a bunny for Jade, a Cotton for @Fablegate , a Prim for @obsessiveart , and a Mersel for Vamp! #illustration
2
6
(appreciated) 🥺🥺🥺
1
😳😳😳
2
time is on a vacation and I haven't seen them for a while 😔
2
21 Feb 2021
Hugs and smooches~! Between my tall demon fella Danllma and @Fablegate 's demon, Argull. 💕
1
5
15
also Berso belongs to @Fablegate!
4
Sigma's alt. court/Overseer outfit where, despite the color clash, she uses her bf's palette colors Nebulus belongs to @Fablegate
2
12
78
Oh jeez, thanks Lynx! My drawing speed has slowed way down lately, but I like to think I'm pushing myself. Quote retweet with your art and tag artists to keep the train going! @hntrgurl13 @Fablegate @UncleMod @cranky_teapot
Thanks Renee! I feel like I have to go waaay back since all my recent art has just been comic pages... Quote retweet with your art and tag artists to keep the train going! (Trying to tag people I haven't seen yet...) @quodVidi @Rebmakash @starspecters @YunisVerse @rasenth
5
Day 20 - Eus (Character belongs to @Fablegate) #huevember #huevember2020
11
52
JDKSKDKFK Y E S
2