Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Mike retweeted
Replying to @Xmusknewsx
She is correct.
2
1
11
wait wait, so like, if america was communist, no fame at all? lol, but what about all those weird celebs then? hmm...
1
3
3 Libras Magdelena retweeted
Replying to @WHLeavitt
UK Royalty is long past its best before date as they support the destruction of their Kingdom IMHO.
1
2
8
121
Replying to @fieldpro @WHLeavitt
The UK is being conquered from the inside while their idiot king thinks he’s accomplishing something virtuous. The only thing he’s securing is his place in Hell.
1
2
13
merit for what? freedom to do what? what kind of corruption?
4
BDuke retweeted
1
1
15
BDuke retweeted
1
1
16
Did you digest this hidden gem of intention . . .
3
10
Susan Dee🇨🇦 retweeted
Jun 13
Replying to @GadSaad
I agree Gad. Capitalism vs socialism... no contest.
1
1
8
sandrababe retweeted
Jun 12
Replying to @AntiWokeMemes
Always playing the race card.
1
8
Replying to @fieldpro @Neccccy
👌😡👏👏👏👏
7
cdngeol - P.Geol. retweeted
So many questions. Who and how are social media posts reviewed? What constitutes “social stability”? How is it proven that social stability is “undermined? Do jokes undermine social stability? Who decides what a joke is? How will this law be applied to posts created and read outside of Canada? Who issues the order to block? Who receives the order to block? What penalty is applied if posts aren’t blocked? Does this new law undermine social stability and, if so, can it block itself?🤔🙃
2
32
79
1,218
He spends more on appetizers on Canada One, than Canadians spend in a month.
1
52
#NoDigitalID Nancy #NoCBDC retweeted
I looked quickly so may ne mistaken but it does not use or define "social stability" as a regulatory standard. It defines and focuses strictly on concepts like "harmful content," "synthetic content," "serious bodily harm," and "content that incites violence." There are Charter issues there, for sure.
2
4
67