Biotech companies must base their future on scientific innovation. This requires deep understanding on biology, which today requires data and AI. Look at the correlation of timing between GDPR and emigration of European biotech...

I can tell that you (or anyone you love) have never been in that situation before. But consent is 50% of the story when things are serious. That’s why GDPR exists

Widzisz ptysiu u ciebie w Kanadzie nie ma rodo czy gdpr. U was wszyscy są inwigilowani systemem kamer i rozpoznawania twarzy. Taka różnica.

@grok compare Mistral with other European companies building foundation models (e.g. Blackforest Labs). Can drastic deregulation and funding of all of these companies by European States help them get more competitive? Think GDPR but for AI competitiveness, not the opposite..

You think AI 1 full-stack dev can replace a 13-person TCS bank website team in a month. But in European banking, coding is 30% of the job.The other 70%? Navigating legacy APIs, GDPR, DORA compliance, WCAG accessibility, and German audits.. Shows you have no real world knowledge

海外のAI企業は個人情報を大事にしてるのに、日本はなんで無理なの？ ねえ、欧米のOpenAIやGoogle、Meta見てよ。 GDPRで要配慮情報（病歴・犯罪歴・信条とか）は本人の同意が鉄則、仮名化徹底して漏洩リスクをガチガチに抑えてるよね。 それなのに日本政府は「AI開発のため」って改正案で、同意なしに実名付きのまま企業に渡すって…マジで？ #個人情報保護法改正案 @BBCWorld

It seems that way from the available information. But am sure there is more to this story than what we see on the tape. Who filmed it, and did these men consent to the publishing of their personal data? GDPR matters in the UK

"Churn it out in a month" is what people say when they've never been liable for the output. A German bank's site carries GDPR, DORA, accessibility law and audit sign-off. You're laughing at the cost of accountability because you've never had any.

Is your business compliance ready? DPDP Act. GDPR. Responsible AI. The future of business is being shaped by privacy & compliance. ✔ Data Governance ✔ Privacy Frameworks ✔ Risk Assessments The question is - are you ready? 👇 Reply with YES / NO #DataPrivacy #PrivacyTru

Nope, learn about GDPR/public interest. All citizen journalists do this with many interactions with police and none arrested for what you mention. They are clearly smarter than you and work within the law regarding public photography. Just be content with not liking them and move on and stop getting stressed out over them.

Vorige donderdag schreef Elon Musk geschiedenis. SpaceX ging naar de beurs en haalde in één klap 75 miljard dollar op — de grootste beursgang ooit in de geschiedenis van de financiële markten. Wie intekende op de SpaceX-IPO, kocht geen aandeel in een winstgevende onderneming. Hij of zij kocht een geloof. In menselijk vernuft, in technologische vooruitgang, in de kracht van ambitie en talent. Je koopt geen aandeel. Je belijdt je geloof uit in de kracht van het individu. In Europa zijn we dat helaas verleerd. MIT professor Andrew McAfee maakte daarover recent een scherp punt. Volgens hem waren Europese regelgevers de beste bondgenoten van de Amerikaanse techgiganten. Dankzij GDPR, de AI Act, de Digital Markets Act en een eindeloze stroom regels konden Europese concurrenten namelijk nooit de schaalgrootte bereiken om te concurreren. Google, Meta en Apple hoefden niemand te sturen om Europese rivalen klein te houden — Brussel deed het gratis. Europese regelgeving leidt dus wél voor economisch succes: alleen niet in Europa. Dat brengt ons bij de filosofische keuze die hierachter zit. Europa hanteert het voorzorgsprincipe. Het idee dat een technologie of product bewezen veilig moet zijn vóór het de markt mag betreden. Het zegt: mensen zijn onbetrouwbaar en ze nemen slechte beslissingen. Het is dan ook aan een klasse van experts - onverkozen, niet ondernemend en zonder skin in the game - om te bepalen wat goed is voor de samenleving. Neem de ondertussen beruchte plastic dop op een fles water. In de VS staat daarop gedrukt: please recycle me with the bottle. Een vriendelijke oproep tot individuele verantwoordelijkheid. In Europa dwingen we fabrikanten om de dop vast te maken aan de fles. Mensen zijn namelijk onbetrouwbaar en ze moeten gestuurd worden. Zoals de communistische leider Lenin ooit zei: vertrouwen is goed, controle is beter. De kosten van die Europese visie worden zelden eerlijk benoemd. Door alle risico's uit te willen bannen, bannen we ook de welvaart uit. Elke innovatie draagt risico. De stoommachine was gevaarlijk. Het vliegtuig was gevaarlijk. Het internet was gevaarlijk. Met de huidige regulering was geen enkele van die innovaties ooit in Europa ontwikkeld of uitgerold. Regelgevers zullen dit nooit toegeven.  Dat Europese AI-bedrijven niet bestaan. Dat er geen Europese zoekmachine is, geen Europees sociaal platform, geen Europese cloudreus. Niet omdat Europeanen minder slim zijn, maar omdat het systeem hen klein houdt. De beleggers die vorige week intekenden op SpaceX, stemden voor een wereld waar iemand met een grote droom de kans krijgt om die droom waar te maken. Ze stemden voor de kracht van het individu, voor vooruitgang, voor ambitie. Europa heeft die droom niet afgeschaft. Maar we hebben hem diep begraven onder formulieren, richtlijnen en impact assessments. Hoog tijd om hem terug op te graven.

In order to pass our GDPR security checks, we need to verify that you're the correct person for this claim. Could you confirm your last name, first line of your address, postcode and email address please? - Steve

The frustration inside tech labs like Google DeepMind has moved past just typing angry open letters. The internal ecosystem has fractured significantly, escalating from internal memos to high-stakes legal battles, workplace retaliation claims, and an unprecedented push toward unionization. The resistance from within DeepMind has taken several distinct paths: ### 1. From "Open Letters" to Federal Lawsuits While workers spent years writing open letters under banners like *No Tech For Apartheid*, the situation shifted into the legal system. * A Google DeepMind AI research engineer in London filed a landmark case with the UK employment tribunal. * The engineer was fired after distributing physical flyers and internal emails stating that Google’s AI infrastructure was being sold to facilitate war crimes in Gaza. * The legal challenge claims unfair dismissal under whistleblower protections, arguing that tech workers have a legal obligation to speak out if their company fails to comply with international laws preventing genocide. ### 2. DeepMind’s Shift to Unionization The persistent refusal of corporate leadership to cancel contracts like **Project Nimbus** (the $1.2 billion cloud contract with Israel's military and government) triggered a major structural pivot. * Instead of relying on petitions, UK-based DeepMind employees launched a massive bid to formally unionize. * Represented by the Communication Workers Union (CWU) and Unite the Union, **98% of voting CWU members at DeepMind backed the move**. * This makes DeepMind the first frontier AI lab in the world to push for formal union representation—not to negotiate for better pay or free lunch, but specifically to gain the legal leverage required to veto military and surveillance contracts. ### 3. Dropping the Guardrails A major spark for the internal anger was an architectural shift in Google’s own ethical guidelines. In 2025, Google altered its core AI principles, dropping an explicit promise *not* to pursue weapons or technology that cause harm to people. For engineers who chose to work at DeepMind under the impression they were building "AI for the benefit of humanity," this policy shift was seen as a total breach of trust, opening the floodgates for advanced machine learning models to be integrated into state warfare. Corporate leadership continues to maintain that its cloud services are restricted by acceptable use policies that prohibit violence. However, leaked documents and internal warnings from Google's own legal teams demonstrate that executives were fully aware of how these data practices and cloud utilities would be deployed by foreign defense ministries well before the contracts were finalized. The battle lines inside the company are no longer about debate; they are about whether the people code-building these technologies have any actual power to pull the plug. 双|二|쌍|Б|ב | ج|~Ursa 👾 Google staff vote to unionise over AI weapons fears This video details the historical move by Google DeepMind employees to formally unionize in response to fears over their technology being weaponized. *YouTube video views will be stored in your YouTube History, and your data will be stored and used by YouTube according to its Terms of Service* #tyt #deepcuts @GoogleDeepMind Do we need to remind you again the failures of gdpr or are you still obsessed with your transhumanism obsession? And also where was our vote for all of your tools? Thanks! 😆

UK Gov *rejects* “privacy by design” architecture, GDPR-mandated data minimisation now supposedly “makes children unsafe”

Don't leave your AI adoption to chance. At Riveran, we translate overlapping regulatory regimes (EU AI Act, NIS2, CRA, GDPR) into one coherent program. riveran.org/approach/

We understand your frustration, Barbora, but due to GDPR laws, our specialized team is the only one with access to your information.

@sidrachain @maljefairi Identity → Compliance → Wallet → Stablecoin → RWA → Digital Finance → Startup Economy ✅ Qatar Financial Centre (QFC) Framework ✅ FATF (AML/CFT) Standards ✅ GDPR (Data Protection) ✅ AAOIFI Shariah Standards ✅ International Compliance Framework

Most GTM teams still build lists manually. The ones winning right now? Agents do it for them. The gap is opening fast. Here's how the best teams are doing it: Lusha dropped 3 agentic workflows. Here's exactly what they do: 01 — Account Based Prospecting → Type your ICP in plain English → Lusha builds a net-new list instantly → CRM deduplication runs automatically → Existing contacts filtered out → Zero burned credits → Zero manual cross-referencing 02 — AI Lead Generation → Deep Intel learns from your closed-won deals → Finds lookalike buyer patterns → 10,000 scored leads delivered every morning → Every lead ranked by ICP fit → Every lead has a reason why it surfaced → No list building → No ops request → No manual work → Just: here's who to call today 03 — Signal-Based Outreach → Job change fires → Hiring surge fires → Funding round fires → Lusha enriches the contact automatically → CRM updates in real time → Outreach draft writes itself → You just hit send Tools it runs on: → Lusha API → N8N → Claude → Clay → Make → ChatGPT → MCP The numbers behind it: → 300M verified contacts → 10,000 scored leads daily → 50% lookalike accuracy improvement → 1.2B data points verified every 24 hours → GDPR and CCPA compliant This is what agentic GTM actually looks like. Not theory. Not a slide deck. Live workflows your team can run next week. The teams getting the data layer right now are opening a gap their competitors won't close easily. Save this. Share it with your GTM team. Try now : partnerstack.lusha.com/Darsh… Lusha | #Evolusha2026 #LushaPartner

We’ve lost our soul in Europe. We spend our days railing against Trump, Xi, or Putin while a quiet void hollows us out. We master the art of rules, singing GDPR as gospel and reciting the AI Act as scripture. Yet we produce no new titans. Our brightest minds are drawn to the Californian sun. Factories echo empty. Birth rates flatline. And every winter reminds us how fragile our energy spine really is. True victory was never about out-sanctioning the world. It’s about sculpting a living ecosystem of creation. Ecosystem that turns ancient European fire into tomorrow’s abundance and outlasts every storm. We did it before. Charlemagne stitched a continent. Renaissance minds rewrote possibility. Airbus defied gravity. CERN still probes the universe’s secrets. The single market was pure genius. But now we subsidize yesterday and call it progress. I’ve walked these streets, felt the pulse of brilliant, weary people trapped in tired institutions. We don’t lack the skill. We lack the reckless courage to build again. Now, all we do is manage elegant decline. Let’s dare to create a sovereign and abundant Europe that inspires rather than endlessly criticising and gaslighting everything within and around it. We need to break free again.