$SPCX reached a value of 3 trillion United States dollars. This value could end world hunger for 32 years It surpasses the GDPs of Australia, South Korea, Mexico, Spain, Indonesia, Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Switzerland, Poland, Italy and dozens more.

the true cross obviously, splinters of it was traded for annual GDPs of major nations in history.

Elon Musk explains the importance of Starlink and how it will increase GDPs of the countries “If you don’t have access to the internet, or it’s too expensive or low bandwidth, you cannot access MIT lessons, you can’t access information, and you can’t sell your goods and services” Starlink changes all of that “Starlink will actually move the GDP of countries. It’s going to be that kind of thing” Because GDP is simply average productivity per person and connectivity massively boosts productivity

تحديثات اليوم: توقعات موجة MJO الرئيسية - منهجية SCORPION - النموذج الكندي GDPS من 16 يونيو حتى 26 يونيو 2026 النموذج الكندي يلحق بالنموذج GFS في نشراته الأخيرة. بيئة الحمل الحراري العميق ستعود مرة أخرى إلى المحيط الهندي حوض IPWP = نشاط نظم الرياح الموسمية الصيفية هناك.

There's no single project William Ruto has unveiled in Kenya that is void of a mega scandal ever since he was elected president. NOT. A. SINGLE. ONE. And these are only the ones brought to public light. Kenyans are losing whole GDPs worth in anything he touches.

Insane. Gained more in 24 hours than most countries’ GDPs. 🚀 The guy who’s trying to make humanity multi-planetary just became a one-man economy.

Guestimates. GDPs don't equate across borders so comparisons aren't valid.

Insane 😂 One day gain bigger than most countries’ GDPs. Love him or hate him, this is what happens when you actually ship rockets, EVs, and internet-from-space instead of just talking about it. Future is being built right now 🚀

Per David Kang: from 1368 to 1841, there were only 2 formal interstate conflicts within the confucian-sinic sphere (China, Korea, Vietnam, Japan), & well over 200 within Europe, even tho the former had ~2.5x the pop of the latter; yet their conflict death rates, life expectancies, & GDPs per capita were broadly similar, & this is the period Europe really took off (eg suddenly producing far superior ships & logistics, & then the modern state & renaissance & enlightenment & Industrial Revolution). & yet if anything sovereignty was clearer in the east: the borders were more stable, the bureaucracies & institutions & taxes & monarchs more durably & cleanly separated, etc; whereas in Europe there were much more clearly distinct peoples with much more interest in self-rule, but nonetheless much more overlapping cross-border governance (religious, commercial, chivalric, noble, & other such orders). On the other hand, sovereignty was much more focused on maintaining formal equality in the west (each state is ostensibly equal in certain legalistic & cultural respects geopolitically equal before its continent, & the great power game is all about preventing any singular hegemon from arising), whereas China was openly & formally dominant over other nonetheless formal & practical sovereigns in its tributary system. (Yes, this is in some ways the most extreme way to frame the comparison, since the sinic sphere was of course not infrequently riven with peasant rebellions, barbarian invasions, pacification campaigns, etc, & had several interstate wars with other formal states, eg Burma or Siam; but it’s also clearly a real distinction, & not limited to these particular periods or definitions, & one could argue that Europe contrasted more with China beforehand—eg Europe’s map 900-1300 was more characterized by the formation of protoethnonationstatelets like what we see now, & 1400-1800 saw the consolidation of it into anomalous imperial blocs more like oriental cosmopolitan despotism than in other European periods). The choice back then was between an often meritocratic universalizing cultural prestige network & an arena in which vigorous competition was formally organized into explicit conflicts; ie formal inequality & informal conflict, vs formal equality & formal conflict. Globalist government by civilized norms & elite regulation thru static old separated bureaucracies, vs populist competition by armed bands & material production over dynamic new unitary systems. Europe’s approach was much better at producing the sorts of charismatic excess & effective innovation that mattered. Because it doesn’t really matter if any given conflict was originally smart, so long as everyone’s necessarily trying to learn from what happened (so they don’t lose horribly); eg part of Britain’s brilliance is that it’d invent makework adventures for men like Bligh between wars, to figure out who was great at leading men on crazy missions, & reward him with real meaningful authorities (or in the case of eg Shackleton the accolades to inspire those pursuing more practical ends to try more dashing means). That’s why the Ages of Sail & Colonization were so fruitful: each vessel & settlement & company its own fresh quasi-sovereign, alone in the wilderness, unburdened by home’s sunk costs & set habits, expected to lose everything unless it gambled well, & otherwise proved sovereign for us. Many of our current issues flow from our dramatic turn against our heritage in this regard, & many of our current enemies are obsessed with damming up whatever we could otherwise unleash this impulse thru.

We should have built 1 stadium each specifically for the World Cup in maybe 2 or 3 states out of the top 10 with lowest GDPs and see what they do when their local economies reach bonkers levels of ‘we don’t even know what to do with this much money’ over night

I'm not even American but nothing about this is "a joke". They have stealth bombers worth more than many countries' entire GDPs

Iran: "You bombed us." US: "Here's $300 billion, our bad." Trump pays Iran more than most countries' GDPs — and calls it diplomacy.

I feel like most countries I’ve been to rely on tourism to a pretty nasty degree. Maybe tourism doesn’t make up as much as these country’s GDPs compared to Japan but that’s only because they are obscure and Japan is not but tourism remains the most lucrative industry in those places

They have asked US for bailouts for their losses. Their GDPs are in the billions, not trillions range... Where exactly would a country with a 200 billion GDP get 300 billion? Oh, the US.

daily changes in Elon's net worth = measured in sovereign country GDPs 😭

EA GDPs Tanzania's 🇹🇿 economy will hit the USD 100 billion mark by the end of 2026. With a popn. of 75 million, its GDP will soar above the current USD 95 billion GDP following a deliberate slowdown due to strategic investments and elections Now is the time to take off

Only 21 countries have GDPs greater than Elon Musk's net worth.

if you want...go here - spotwx.com/ type in "invermere" then check the GDPS (RDPS as you get closer to wknd) & GFS to keep an eye on how it's developing