The US government’s decision to restrict access to certain advanced AI platforms has triggered anxiety across the technology industry.
Many are asking:
“Will India fall behind?”
I believe we are asking the wrong question.
The issue is not access.
The issue is dependence.
I have lived through a similar moment before.
When restrictions were imposed on IBM mainframes, many believed India would be disadvantaged. Instead, those constraints forced Indian companies, entrepreneurs, and engineers to explore alternatives, build capabilities, and innovate using UNIX .
What looked like a setback helped lay the foundation for India’s IT industry.
History has a strange habit.
When access is easy, we follow.
When access is restricted, we BUILD
That is why I see this moment less as a threat and more as an opportunity.
An opportunity to reduce dependence.
An opportunity to create alternatives.
An opportunity to strengthen India’s AI capabilities rather than merely consume those created elsewhere.
We understand this principle well in energy. No country wants to depend on a single source.
Why should AI be any different?
A more diverse AI ecosystem will ultimately be more innovative, more resilient, and more competitive.
But there is an even bigger lesson.
The greatest danger of the AI age is not that a technology becomes unavailable.
It is that we become so dependent on technology that we stop believing in our own ability to create.
The moment we start treating technology companies as indispensable, we surrender something far more valuable than access.
We surrender agency.
And every great leap forward in human history has begun when people chose agency over dependence.
#HumansFirst