"Postponing the consecration" and then what? Would the Pope give them bishops then or only tolerate them as minimally as possible like FSSP and Icksp? We must be realistic here that it's all part of the politics of the Vatican to hold the sspx back until no bishops left.
The icksp and fssp have no problems establishing apostolates. More and more bishops are celebrating TLM. It was never about the TLM for SSPX. The TLM will live forever and will be restored by working with Rome.
Not knowing the New Mass doesn't make one irregular in any canonical or theological sense. He could be ICKSP or IBP, or a Byzantine with biritual faculties who learned the Old Mass to meet a pastoral need, or any number of other things.
FSSP, ICKSP, all the rest of the INDULT GROUP, are USELESS. Useless. Why? Because THEY COMPROMISE.
They are so shallow-minded. Theyβre just being fooled by those SYNDICATES IN ROME.
"Can (licitly) say" vs "is trained in". Do the FSSP, ICKSP, Campos *train* their priests for the NO? That's the question in this context. You may well know better than me, but it's my understanding that they don't.
And, again, are you accusing Schneider of illicit ordinations?