Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
What’s the difference between IPSec and jump server
3
What is a Face Card is it tracked oNa Wa 💡 Ch Clocked oNa Doc ⛵ ket Kings a d His Court Shhh⛵iPS iPSec ~ s @Soinull @FBIDirectorKash @CIADirector Your Genius Pales like a Bilge Pump hails Your Train has no H Tracks Your Plane is simply 2 PL∆iN ..o(f)in eXi($)T ∆ Ts
1
15
Maybe I should stop talking I’m ruining IPsec
1
2
102
Android12からL2TP禁止なので下記の通り設定 ipsec ike remote name 2 name fqdnのIPSEC IDのnameとmode-cfgで付与アドレス指定は必須 rtpro.yamaha.co.jp/RT/docs/i… tunnel select 2 tunnel encapsulation ipsec ipsec tunnel 2 ~~~ ipsec ike mode-cfg address pool 1 192.168.100.200-192.168.100.215

66
kataてぃんくる㌠🍥 retweeted
ワイ「Android12でL2TP/IPsecを使う方法ないんか…」 検索結果「OpenVPN使え」「Android11で登録しろ」「使えますよ?そんなんも知らないんですか??」「調査したところAndroid12ではつかえないようです!いかがでしたか?」
15
60
kataてぃんくる㌠🍥 retweeted
22 Jul 2023
Android12以降ってL2TP/IPsecできないの??
2
3
535
كل التفاصيل اللى إنت محتاج تعرفها على موقعنا هنا itwithhossam.com/ccnp-online 📚 كورس المحترفين CCNP Enterprise هنشرح تراكين مع بعض: ✅ ENCOR 350-401 ✅ ENARSI 300-410 🎯 هنتعلم مواضيع شاملة ومهمة: 🔹 Routing: OSPF, EIGRP, BGP MPLS L3 VPN, VRF Route Target / Route Distinguisher PBR, BFD 🔹 Switching: RSTP / MSTP / PVST VTP, Etherchannel, DTP FHRP (HSRP / VRRP / GLBP) BPDU (Filter, Guard), (Loop, Root) Guard, UDLD 🔹 Security: AAA, 802.1X, Access Lists DMVPN, IPSec, NGFW, NGIPS DMVPN, IPSec, IPv6 First Hop security features 🔹 SDN & Automation: SD-Access, SD-WAN, DNAc Python, APIs, Netconf, Restconf JSON, LISP, XML 🔹 Virtualization: Virtual Machines, VXLAN, LISP VM vs Container 🔹 Network Assurance: SNMP, SysLog, NetFlow IPSla, SPAN 🗓️ المواعيد: 📍 الجمعة والسبت : 8 مساءً - 11 مساءً بتوقيت القاهرة 🇪🇬 🕗 تواصل معايا للحجز على واتساب من هنا 👇 wa.me/ 201010962050 🚀 ابدأ رحلتك مع Cisco وحقق حلم الاحتراف!
30
GCP classic VPNとRTX840でのIPSecはIKE v2だとSA rekeyのタイミングで切れるな。IKE v1にして様子見。
134
OSI基本参照モデルのネットワーク層で動作し,“認証ヘッダ(AH)”と“暗号ペイロード(ESP)”の二つのプロトコルを含むものはどれか。 IPsec S/MIME SSH XML暗号 qe.hpeo.jp/entry/ipa-fe/e420…

417
Perso win 11 arm sur mac os avec du M3 ça fonctionne très bien, c'était le seul moyen d'avoir une connexion vpn Ipsec avec le client fortivpn fonctionnelle car sous macos natif ça ne connectait pas !
16
SHERRY retweeted
BGP も喋れるし ACL や IPsec VPN/IKEv2 とかもできるのでかなり遊べる
IX2105で出来ること ●ミラーリングパケットキャプチャ ●ブリッジしてFirewall ●普通にルーター ●VRF-Liteしてルートテーブル分ける ●VLAN動作確認 ●PPPoE接続 その他諸々だけど他にどんな事で楽しめるかな!
4
15
1,477
halpeq retweeted
ZUNDA CONNECT ROUTERはL2TP over IPSecにも対応してますが、1500を超えるMTUを扱いたいとかいろいろあって今回のL2延伸はVXLANを使うことにしました。
今回の #shownet ZUNDA の例のルーターが VXLAN 喋って L2 延伸してるの良かった。意外なサポート状況 (実際L2TPとかより実装するの楽そうではありそう)
1
1
6
2,777
🚨 Palo Alto root-level bug shows the real infrastructure problem. $ICP ♾️ This is not just another cybersecurity headline. Palo Alto fixed PAN-OS vulnerabilities where authenticated admins could gain root-level command execution or privilege escalation. That means the control plane itself becomes the risk. Key facts: • CVE-2026-0273: authenticated command injection • Root-level command execution via CLI or Web UI • Affects PA-Series, VM-Series and Panorama • CVE-2026-0272: CLI privilege escalation • CVE-2026-0269: tunnel traffic DoS affecting IPsec / GlobalProtect exposure • Palo Alto says no known malicious exploitation at disclosure This is the legacy infrastructure model: Admin accounts. Management interfaces. Root privileges. Patch windows. Hotfixes. Centralised control planes. Post-compromise blast radius. This is exactly why sovereign compute matters. $ICP by @dfinity is not “just another blockchain.” It is a different infrastructure model: • Replicated canister compute • Subnet-level execution • Cryptographic verification • On-chain governance • Tamper-resistant state • No normal cloud admin sitting above the application with silent root access $ICP does not remove software bugs. No serious system can claim that. But it changes the trust model. From centralised infrastructure controlled by privileged administrators… To protocol-secured compute governed on-chain. That is the real shift. The market is still arguing about TPS, memes and fees. The serious infrastructure debate is about root access, sovereign compute, control-plane risk and who can actually tamper with the system. That is where $ICP is already playing. $ICP by @dfinity Tags: #$ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #CyberSecurity #SovereignCloud #DecentralizedCloud #OnChainCompute #Infrastructure #Web3 #AI Donations / contributions: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
2
13
392
carlos jugo retweeted
What is IPSec (Internet Protocol Security)? What is Internet Key Exchange IKE? How to configure IPSec tunnel?mpls.internetworks.in/2021/0…
2
14
287
carlos jugo retweeted
What is IKE (Internet Key Exchange)? How to configure IPSec site-to-site?mpls.internetworks.in/2021/0…
2
15
197
#threatreport #LowCompleteness Arctic Wolf Observes an Increase in Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect Authentication Bypass Exploitation via CVE-2026-0257 | 11-06-2026 Source: arcticwolf.com/resources/blo… Key details below ↓ 💀Threats: Impacket_tool, 🎯Victims: Insurance, Finance, Manufacturing, Education, Engineering, Healthcare, Europe, North america, United states 🏭Industry: Financial, Healthcare, Education 🌐Geo: United states, America 🔓CVEs: CVE-2026-0257 \[[Vulners](vulners.com/cve/CVE-2026-025…)] - CVSS V3.1: *9.1*, - Vulners: Exploitation: True Soft: - paloaltonetworks pan-os (<10.2.7, 10.2.8, 10.2.9, 10.2.10, 10.2.11) 🤖LLM extracted TTPs:` T1046, T1087.002, T1133, T1135, T1190, T1550.004 🧨IOCs: - IP: 2 💽Software: PAN-OS, Linux #threatreport: Arctic Wolf has reported a surge in exploitation of the authentication bypass vulnerability CVE-2026-0257, which affects Palo Alto Networks' PAN-OS GlobalProtect and Prisma Access. This increase was noted from late May to early June 2026, triggered by the release of exploit code and detailed descriptions of the vulnerability. Successful exploitation hinges on specific configurations: the GlobalProtect portal or gateway must be exposed, and authentication override cookies must be reused or exposed alongside the certificate they rely on. Initially, the malicious activity was characterized by suspicious login attempts from virtual private servers, leading to the establishment of IPSec tunnels and subsequent internal reconnaissance activities indicative of Impacket tool usage. CVE-2026-0257 allows for remote, unauthenticated actors to forge authentication cookies, providing unauthorized VPN access under certain configuration conditions. Its severity was re-evaluated from a CVSS score of 4.7 to 7.8 following the growing awareness and publication of exploit techniques. This vulnerability has affected diverse sectors, including finance, healthcare, and education, primarily within organizations in Europe and North America. The exploitation patterns revealed significant attempts to log into GlobalProtect admin accounts using, notably, cookie-based authentication from VPS infrastructure. While most intrusions witnessed repeated authentication failures, some progressed into authenticated sessions, leading to automated SMB reconnaissance and network share enumeration. This behavior suggests that threat actors were exploiting unauthorized VPN access to facilitate further actions in the internal network. The observed activity consistently demonstrated patterns of immediate post-authentication actions involving SMB session requests and domain user discovery, with actors rapidly transitioning from successful VPN connection establishment to reconnaissance efforts. Despite the clear capabilities indicated by these actions, most exploitations did not extend significantly beyond initial intrusions. Defensive recommendations focus on monitoring for suspicious authentication events, particularly from VPS or Tor exit node IPs, anomalous login patterns, and signs of Impacket activity following VPN sessions. Organizations using GlobalProtect are advised to scrutinize login attempts and subsequent session behaviors to identify and mitigate potential exploitation.
96
Yamahaでipsec越しにBGPはろうとしてるけどicmpの疎通性もあるのにLocal host: unspecifiedで張り出ししねぇ…logも止まってるしなんなんだろうか…
46