bizdeki bu vibe göremezsin
Raj Gala retweeted
Why did this even reach ITAT. This is why people get so upset with the tax departments FM @nsitharaman .
ITC denied to customers when their vendors don't deposit , TDS credit denied to an employee whose employer fails to remit.
20h
Bangalore ITAT granted a former BYJU'S employee credit for ₹67.9 lakh TDS, holding that an employee cannot be penalised for the employer's failure to deposit TDS or file returns. Once tax is deducted from salary, TDS credit cannot be denied. taxguru.in/income-tax/employ…
1
7
17
1,421
Indian retweeted
21h
Kerala HC condoned a 676-day delay in filing an ITAT appeal, accepting the assessee's bona fide explanation that former auditors failed to file the appeal. The Court held that specific facts indicating genuine belief and absence of deliberate delay warranted a liberal approach. taxguru.in/income-tax/kerala…
2
10
699
ColaBlizzard 🇮🇳 retweeted
20h
Bangalore ITAT granted a former BYJU'S employee credit for ₹67.9 lakh TDS, holding that an employee cannot be penalised for the employer's failure to deposit TDS or file returns. Once tax is deducted from salary, TDS credit cannot be denied. taxguru.in/income-tax/employ…
4
12
3,202
🔴 Case Law Decoded | ITAT Ahmedabad | June 2026 Dhaval Patel vs. ACIT [2026] 187 taxmann 292 (Ahmedabad Trib.)
A case every taxpayer and CA in India must read.
During a search — the AO found a WhatsApp message on the assessee's phone: "50 lacks given to Manan yesterday."
The AO's conclusion: ₹50 lakh unaccounted cash payment. Addition made. CIT(A) confirmed.
ITAT Ahmedabad: Addition of ₹50 lakh — DELETED entirely. The Tribunal's reasoning was surgical:
▸ The WhatsApp message said "given" — it did NOT say "cash given"
▸ The assessee provided ledger account, PAN, and address of the recipient
▸ The AO neither examined the recipient nor conducted any independent inquiry
▸ No cash withdrawals, no diary entries, no corroborative material was brought on record
▸ An isolated WhatsApp message without corroboration can create suspicion — but suspicion is NOT evidence of undisclosed income.
The addition was built on assumption. It fell on proof.
✅ The critical takeaway for every taxpayer: Your WhatsApp messages CAN be seized during a search. But a message alone — without cash withdrawal evidence, diary entries, or recipient confirmation — cannot sustain a Section 69 addition. Digital evidence must be corroborated with financial evidence. One without the other is suspicion.
Courts require proof. If you have received an addition based solely on WhatsApp messages or digital evidence from a search — the law is on your side.
— @CSALegal | Tax Lawyers
#IncomeTax #SearchAndSeizure #WhatsApp #Section69 #ITAT #CaseLaw #TaxLitigation #CSALegal
2
3
54
CA AKASH BHAYANI retweeted
Jun 12
[5] Bose's defense at ITAT
He came with evidence:
🔸 Affidavit on the fiduciary nature
🔸 Sample challans matching client tax payments
🔸 Paper book of 552 pages
🔸 Bank statements: nearly every credit matched a debit
Nearly every rupee went out as tax.
1
8
3,431
Tax professionals & CAs. ITAT & CESTAT just got unified.
All 30 ITAT benches CESTAT zones are now live on eCourtsIndia.
62k ITAT matters searchable by name, CNR or bench with full-text orders. No login required.
Stop switching between portals. Everything in one place.
Full post → blogs.ecourtsindia.com/2026/…
#ITAT #CESTAT #TaxLaw #IncomeTax #LegalTech #eCourtsIndia
1
1
19
Ben cocuktum bu kişi siyasetteydi 51 yasınsayım hala siyasette üstelik ülkeye zerre faydası yok,tek meziyeti itat etmek.
17
111
CA Akshay Kochar retweeted
Jun 12
ITAT Chennai Deletes Rs 29.87 Crore Addition on Chartered Accountant who Acted Merely as Medium for Payment of Clients’ Taxes
1
9
71
10,326
Pratibha Gupta retweeted
ITAT Delhi Upholds Disallowance of Section 80GGC Deduction on Rs 3 Lakh Political Donation Treated as Accommodation Entry
1
4
27
4,897