As a scientist/astronomer & planetary scientist - I agree. This is why mw & the rest of the mb gang are irrelevant. Debunking by definition assumes you already have an "accepted/acceptable" outcome & you set out to shred all opposing opinions.
#3IATLAS is a great example, mw would instantly assume it's just a "natural comet" & attack everyone else.
For example,
#AviLoeb does not support an
#ET explanation for 3I/ATLAS - he is very clear that it may be a comet, but that certain anomalies allow for an alternate explanation that it may be of alien origin. That's scientific approach.
Same is true for me, where I presented 3 separate theories on what
#3IATLAS might be:
1. An interstellar ancient CryoComet
2. A Derelict interstellar
#ET unmanned probe
3. That it is NOT INTERSTELLAR at all, but the result of a distant edge of the Outer Solar System
#ImpactEvent & that it's even possible that Omuamua & Borisov may possibly also be linked to this event.
My point: THAT is science.
Objectively considering & evaluating multiple ideas & then seeing where the data takes you.
That's the scientific method - & realizing one might be wrong & you might discover something completely new & EXCITING!😉
Doesn't mean you don't present & defend a theory - but you most certainly don't outright DISMISS everything & everyone else.
~You don't go in with preconceived notions & OUTRIGHT DISMISS everything else~
That's why mw & his crowd are simply irrelevant - because they are as bad, if not worse, than the supposed"zealots" that they so rabidly decry.