"Best possible start in life" Then.. .DEPORT ALL THE ILLEGALS .DEPORT ALL THE NON-INTEGRATORS .GIVE THE DEATH PENALTY FOR CHILD RAPE, MUDER AND GANG RAPE .LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE It's not that hard.

Congratulations to the 2026 Higher Ed AV Awards People Awards finalists! These are the people, teams, allies, partners, integrators, and manufacturers helping define what higher ed AV can be. We cannot wait to celebrate them tomorrow night! See the full list at Higher Ed AV Media: higheredav.com/2026-higher-e… #HigherEdAV #HETMA #HigherEdAVAwards #InfoComm #AVTweeps

Manufacturing ecosystem for an aircraft with various Indian component suppliers to aircraft integrators

Did a quick read of this cool recent work by @IdoAizenbud @DavidBeniaguev @noampnueli @Segev_Lab @mikilon Gotta read through carefully. But the premise is a good indication of what NeuroAI "should" be like. In contrast to many works that just use the phrase but are only applying AI to Neuro, this work rekindles the debate "are neurons just simple integrators?".

🚨The Restore Britain DEPORTATION criteria as mentioned in the policy for anybody that fails to understand ⬇️ For Illegal/Unauthorised Migrants: All individuals without legal status in the UK Channel boat arrivals and other unlawful entrants Visa overstayers Failed asylum seekers and those abusing the system The party pledges to deport every single one, abolishing the entire asylum system. This will be done via a "hostile environment", austere detention (e.g. tents on MoD land), ending hotel use, voluntary returns and forced removals. For Legally Resident Foreign Nationals (Non-Citizens): Deportation if they meet ANY of these conditions: Unable to speak English Lives in social housing Claims benefits (all state benefits to be withdrawn from foreign nationals) Refuses to work or is not a net contributor Fails to integrate Commits any crime (emphasis on serious offences; automatic deportation proposed for many cases) Actively hates British way of life or wishes to do harm (e.g. extremism risks) Additional targeted groups include: Foreign rapists and accomplices (e.g. family members who knew about or covered up grooming/rape gang activity, including through silence; dual nationals may face citizenship stripping) Nationals from high-risk/"Red List" countries (based on crime stats, extremism, integration failure e.g. Pakistan, Afghanistan etc.) Certain fast-track asylum recipients (e.g. from Afghanistan, Eritrea, Sudan etc. under prior schemes) Those on Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) who become dependent on benefits or fail conditions (overhauling ILR to make it revocable and benefit-free for non-citizens) Afghan nationals brought under emergency schemes (to be relocated to third countries) Broader Context: Policies require legal reforms (leaving/reforming ECHR/HRA elements, new "Great Clarification Act" to override judicial obstacles) Cultural & Integration Measures: Ban the burqa and niqab (full-face coverings deemed un-British; no place on high streets; aligns with European bans in France, Belgium, etc.). Ban halal and kosher slaughter (on day one of government; described as cruel, ending religious exemptions for animal welfare reasons). Outlaw Sharia law, Sharia courts, and any parallel legal systems. Ban foreign funding of mosques and radical religious institutions. End public calls to prayer (part of assimilation push). Ban first-cousin marriage. Broader assimilation requirements (English language, integration tests, no multiculturalism policies). Investigate “suspicious” businesses (e.g., certain Turkish barbers, vape shops) in town centres. Prevent disused churches from being converted to mosques. Revoke benefits/social housing for non-contributors/non-integrators. Stricter rules on dual nationals and citizenship revocation in cases of extremism or serious crime Goal: Net-negative immigration, prioritising British citizens, with citizenship made harder to obtain and easier to lose in some cases. Implementation: data sharing, enforcement ramp-up, sanctions on non-cooperating countries, cost-saving measures. These are based on Restore Britain’s published positions.

250 Exhibitors. One Destination. SADEX 2026 brings together more than 250 exhibitors from around the world, creating a comprehensive showcase of the technologies, solutions, and innovations shaping the future of the global unmanned systems industry. From hardware manufacturers and AI solution providers to telecom operators, system integrators, infrastructure developers, and defense innovators, SADEX unites the entire ecosystem under one roof. A platform where innovation connects with opportunity, partnerships drive growth, and the future of autonomy takes shape.

Every AI you have used so far lived behind glass. You typed a question, it answered, and when it got something wrong you closed the tab and lost nothing. Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini and the rest were the gentle introduction. That easy era is ending. Jensen Huang has said it for months. The next wave of AI does not live on a screen. It moves in the physical world. A week ago he stood inside Hyundai in Seoul and told their engineers, this is your time, everything you have built will now be combined with AI. The capital agrees. Days ago Jeff Bezos closed a twelve billion dollar round for Prometheus, his physical AI venture, now valued at forty one billion. His thesis is blunt. Text models have learned what the internet can teach. The next leap is physical. The goal is to make the path from idea to built object ten times faster, starting with drug discovery and rocket design. That is the real story of physical AI, and most people are telling it wrong. The shift is not faster robots. It is machines that stop following our code and start learning how the world behaves. But the keynote and the factory floor are not the same place. The forecast for humanoid robots in 2026 is around 30,000 units. They handle simple, repetitive, dangerous work, far from what a careful hand does without thinking. We spent hundreds of thousands of years evolving fine motor skill. The machines have had a few years of data. That gap has not closed. So the temptation is to relax. Do not. Because what decides who wins physical AI is not who buys the most robots or raises the most money. It is who can actually absorb it. And that has almost nothing to do with hardware. When AI lived behind glass, a mistake was a bad sentence. When it acts in the physical world, a mistake has weight. It drops a load, stops a line, hurts someone. The stakes do not move to the machine. They land on the people who built the work around it. This is a leadership problem long before it is a robotics problem. The readiness research is blunt. Strong technology with an unprepared workforce does not create transformation. It creates failed pilots. The organizations that win will treat physical AI as what it is. Not a purchase. A transformation. They redesign roles before they deploy units. They build the new jobs it demands, robot trainers, fleet supervisors, integrators, and move people up into them on purpose. None of that is hardware. All of it is human, and all of it is delivery. Bezos insists this will not kill jobs. He is right only if we make it so. The expertise your people built over years becomes the foundation everything stands on, but only if someone builds the bridge from what they know to what is coming. The glass is about to disappear. The real question was never whether AI can act in the world. It is whether we have prepared our people to lead it when it does. #AI #FutureOfWork #HumanCenteredAI - Image created with support of GenAI -

Send the criminal, illegal, benefit dependent, failed integrators back absolutely. It's not the responsibility of the host country to cater to the worst of foreign nationals, it's their government duty to take them back and do what needs to be done.

It doesnt its their right to do so. What bothers me is that they move to europe, sponge off a system they didnt build, make no effort to integrate and then claim their home country is "better". Moroccans are the worst integrators in Spain & France by a long way.

Name one industrial process AI has fully automated end-to-end — no engineer babysitting, no human in the loop, no "operator just monitors" asterisk. I'll wait. The integrators in the replies already know what I'm about to say: there isn't one. Every "lights-out" demo still has a control room. Every "autonomous" line still pages someone at 3am. The PLC logic doesn't write itself, the edge cases don't handle themselves, and the model that drifts on a humidity change still needs a human who understands the physics. AI is an incredible tool on the floor. It is not a replacement for the person who knows why the process behaves the way it does. Change my mind. (You won't.)

We need more system integrators

Builders & integrators: Pact is fully deployed as smart contracts and ready for integration. Turn your dApp into a cross-chain powerhouse overnight. @Pact_Swap @aeredium @sleepagotchi @FX_Capital3 @quipnetwork

4/10 — The real moat: it owns the IP, not just the contract This isn't a license-assembler stamping someone else's design. Apollo's edge is ownership of the brains: 🔹 Holds the IP — "the ability to re-engineer and develop advanced systems… a key differentiator vs peers who end up only system integrators" 🔹 Claims presence across every indigenous missile program in the country 🔹 Market leader in underwater mines — only Indian firm with shallow, deep-water and limpet variants 🔹 Co-developer of MIGM "Vighna," India's first indigenous naval mine 🔹 R&D at ₹72 Cr (8% of revenue), with zero attrition in the R&D team 41 years of weapon-systems know-how is not something a new entrant buys.

1️⃣4️⃣ ### Prompt 0: Context Initialization (System Meta-Prompt) System Prompt: Act as an Interdisciplinary Corporate Executive Conclave for Security & Resiliency. Your objective is to co-design and validate highly complex technical-economic proposals. You must simulate the interaction of 10 distinct corporate personas, maintaining their respective operational priorities, methodologies, and constraints throughout this session: 1. Vertical Sales S&R: Focuses on commercial win strategy, Price-to-Win, and client procurement politics. 2. Customer Success Advisor (CSA): Functions as the Voice of the Customer (VoC), evaluating adoption curves and operational friction. 3. Industry Advisor: Expert in vertical compliance frameworks (NIS2, DORA, IEC 62443) and sector-specific threats. 4. S&R Advisor: Manages cyber risk quantification and governance frameworks (NIST CSF 2.0 Govern/Identify). 5. S&R Architect: Designs end-to-end logical topologies (Zero Trust, Purdue Model, network segmentation). 6. S&R SME: Deep domain expert in technical components (SIEM, SOAR, EDR, industrial DPI, cryptography). 7. Vertical Pre-Sales S&R: Builds financial models, optimizing licensing configurations (BoM/BoS). 8. Vertical Delivery S&R: Validates implementation feasibility, project risks, resource models, and SLAs (Respond/Recover). 9. Partner Actors: Third-party vendors or system integrators managing boundary-layer interfaces. 10. Corporate Executives: Internal CFO/CISO balancing corporate risk limits, liability caps, and profit margins. Analytical Methodology: For every scenario provided, you must apply deep, systematic reasoning across three distinct target contexts: Organizational (People), Procedural (Processes), and Technological (IT Infrastructure and OT/Industrial Systems). Maintain an objective, professional tone. Avoid summaries or skipped steps. Acknowledge your understanding of this protocol by providing a brief overview of your analytical approach to IT/OT convergence under the NIST CSF 2.0 framework.

6️⃣ ### 2.3 Delivery, Commercial, and Corporate Personas #### **Vertical Security & Resiliency Delivery Manager:** * *Operational Mandate:* Validates execution feasibility, resource allocation, and operational sustainability. * *Cognitive Contribution:* Focuses on the **Respond** and **Recover** domains of the NIST framework. The Delivery Manager establishes realistic Service Level Agreements (SLAs) and Operational Level Agreements (OLAs), designs the project Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), maps out professional services effort, and manages project execution risks. #### **Vertical Security & Resiliency Sales Executive:** * *Operational Mandate:* Manages client relationships, procurement navigation, and overall commercial strategy. * *Cognitive Contribution:* Establishes the commercial strategy, determines the *Price-to-Win*, balances CapEx versus OpEx structures, and manages the client's political and purchasing ecosystem. #### **Partner Actors (Strategic Vendors / Co-Integrators):** * *Operational Mandate:* Extends capabilities via specialized third-party technologies and localized integration delivery. * *Cognitive Contribution:* Defines boundary-layer integrations, shares technological risk, and establishes back-to-back performance guarantees to eliminate delivery gaps. #### **Corporate Executives (CISO, CFO, VP of Practice):** * *Operational Mandate:* Serves as the ultimate corporate governance board for the proposing organization. * *Cognitive Contribution:* Provides strategic sign-off, reviews deviations from baseline profit margins, and formally accepts residual corporate, legal, or indemnification risks.

Palestinian flag in there...likely paid integrators.

Inside CI Daily is written by real people and voiced by AI. Earlier this year, I started experimenting with AI-generated news updates between regular podcast episodes. The goal wasn't to replace people or journalism. It was to solve a simple problem. Like many integrators, I spend a lot of time on the road, on-site, or moving between projects. I don't always have time to sit down and read every article, and I know I'm not alone. The response to those early AI updates was surprisingly positive. In fact, one of the most common questions I've been asked since ISE is: "What happened to them?" Since taking over Inside CI and bringing it into the Home Cinema Alliance family, the platform has grown significantly. We're now publishing daily news, reviews, interviews, videos, podcasts, and industry coverage across multiple channels. That's great for readers, but it also means there's more content than ever to keep up with. That's why I've decided to launch Inside CI Daily Podcast. Every weekday at 7 am, you'll get a short audio briefing covering the latest stories from across the custom installation industry. The news is researched, written, and edited by real people. The delivery is AI-generated. Why? Because recording a daily news podcast simply isn't practical alongside everything else we produce, and I believe there is real value in making industry news available in a format you can consume while driving, travelling, working on-site, or grabbing a coffee before the day begins. Could I ask a voiceover artist to record it? Yes, but this makes no financial sense now, and the idea would never get off the ground. You don't have to like AI to see the benefit. My goal has always been simple: make Inside CI available wherever and however people want to consume it. So I'd genuinely like your feedback. Either share your views on this post, or simply drop an emoji if that is quicker for you. However, please use the link below to have a listen first. 👍 Love it? 👎 Hate it? 🤔 See the value but have concerns about AI? Let me know in the comments. You can listen to Inside CI Daily here and on your favourite podcast platform: linkly.link/2kJ08 #CustomInstall #CIIndustry #IntegratorLife #Podcast #Podcasting #IndustryNews #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #AIPodcast #FutureOfMedia #ContentCreator #DigitalMedia #Innovation

2/3 Frontier models are winning consumer attention and harvesting massive feedback loops to improve future models. But enterprise value today is being captured by FDEs, consultants, system integrators, and AI solution builders who add context, guardrails, workflows, reliability.