And, you are trying to normalize and excuse vindictive, tribal, and illegal behavior.
I find it hilarious that you took Lonsdale's "strength" advice. This is the definition of toxic female - spiteful reputational destruction over hurt feelings. This whole escapade makes you look physically, emotionally, and intellectually weak af.
A stable person [be it a man or woman] would have taken the blunt conversation as a dodged bullet. Do you really want someone who is suspicious of you or has animus towards you to work for you? I thought "your people" were good at deduction and math.
I am siding with him because he is an American, and here we have freedom of speech and freedom of association. Be it rude, he was well within his rights to say what he said to you. He was also proven 100% correct in his probability assessment.
I am not siding with him because he is White. I refuse to be tribal based on blood or some immutable characteristic like a backwards low IQ animal. We have laws that replace this protective practice, retard. But, go a head, act as a collective, use the big hands of govnt, and keep trying to stripe rights a way from the individual, and see what kind of antibody response you get.
I am also not siding with him because he said what he said. Even though I respect his honesty, I've had a different experience generally. However, given what I have learned over the last couple of days this has colored my perspective and I will act accordingly going forward. I will now have to assess before associating [especially forming a relationship with contracts], if the individual considers themselves part of "the gang." As an individual, this is the most intelligent thing to do as a preventative protective measure. So, I guess, thanks for your honesty too.