Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
‼️BREAKING: Reform UK announces Lee Anderson Shadow Minister for Defence (in addition to him being Chairman and Vhief Whip) Lee’s press conference was powerful. He said: “I’ve been speaking to people in pubs, cafés and shops, and what they’re telling me is simple. They want tanks. They want aircraft carriers. They want submarines. They want proper defence. And they want it paid for by cancelling net zero, foreign aid, welfare, lawyers, civil servants, tofu, cycle lanes and probably oat milk.” When asked what his actual defence strategy was, Lee replied: “Common sense.” When asked what that meant, he said: “British common sense.” When asked again, he said: “You lot in the media don’t like straight talking.” And there it is. Reform’s defence policy in full: No detail. No serious plan. No defence team. No costing. No understanding of modern warfare. Just Nigel shouting numbers and Lee Anderson turning national security into a pub monologue. Same chaos. Different rosette. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
186
498
1,717
91,027
Elon Musk is not standing for election in Britain. He is not knocking on doors in Clacton. He is not sitting in Parliament. He is not accountable to British voters. And yet somehow, his shadow keeps falling across British politic: Reform. Restore. Farage. Lowe. MAGA influencers. American right-wing think tanks. Different names, same political weather. That should worry people. Because Musk does not need to run Britain to influence Britain. He owns the platform where so much political anger now lives. He can amplify one story. Reward one narrative. Boost one kind of outrage. Turn one tragedy into a culture war. Make one politician look bigger than they really are. And suddenly British politics starts sounding less like Britain and more like imported American rage. That is the danger. Not because ordinary people’s anger is fake. People are tired. People are under pressure. People are worried about housing, borders, crime, wages, the NHS and the future. Those frustrations are real. But powerful billionaires can choose which frustrations get amplified, which targets get selected, and which politicians benefit from the noise. Britain should not become a playground for foreign billionaires, MAGA politics and algorithmic rage. We need repair. Not imported outrage. We need serious government. Not billionaire mood swings. Britain is tired. But Britain does not have to become cruel. With respect, Elon Musk should leave British politics to British voters. Britain needs repair. Not imported American rage. #UKPolitics #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
31
133
304
5,142
By calling Andy Burnham a “disaster” as Prime Minister, Farage is doing two things at once. First, he is trying to drag Labour into leadership gossip. Second, he is trying to create chaos inside Labour, because chaos is the only political weather Reform knows how to operate in. It is bait. Labour should not take it. The country needs delivery, not another Farage-manufactured drama. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
2
17
130
This is exactly how culture-war politics works. Take a police FOI response. Strip out all context. Rename lawful “positive action” as “discrimination against white men.” Then pretend the answer is abolishing equality law. Positive action is not the same as positive discrimination. The Equality Act allows proportionate steps to widen opportunity where groups are under-represented. It does not give public bodies a free pass to discriminate. By all means, question spending. Ask whether these roles deliver value. Ask whether police budgets should prioritise frontline policing. Ask whether the public is getting results for the money. Those are fair questions. But don’t dress up a staffing-cost argument as proof that Britain needs fewer equality protections. That is not “heavy lifting.” That is just turning resentment into policy. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
3
12
175
Replying to @LeeAndersonMP_
Lee Anderson is talking about "dog whistle politics". This is a man who has worn four political badges — Labour, Conservative, Independent and Reform — while repeatedly using the kind of language that keeps outrage permanently simmering. If an MP felt threatened, that should be taken seriously. But disagreement between politicians is not automatically intimidation. And it is difficult to lecture others about political temperature while helping to turn every national argument into a culture-war rage battleground. Parliament needs less theatre and more facts. Less grievance. Less performance. Less outrage as a business model. Because if every disagreement becomes a scandal, and every challenge becomes an attack, politics turns into a permanent victimhood competition. Britain deserves better than that. I may be wrong, but that is how I see it. What do you think? #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
10
15
123
1,768
Replying to @dave43law
Thank you Dave. Looking at this image, what strikes me is how much anger seems to dominate the performance. The clenched expression. The pointing finger. The raised voice. Everything about it projects confrontation rather than persuasion. Politics is at its strongest when people look like they are trying to solve problems. Too often, modern politics looks like people trying to stay angry long enough to make the evening news. You can almost feel the tension coming through the screen. Britain doesn't need more outrage. It needs more answers. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
1
2
8
102
Farage’s trade union pitch is clever politics. But let’s be honest about what it is. A poll showing some union members voting Reform is not the same as trade unions wanting to affiliate to Reform. Workers can be angry. Workers can feel ignored. Workers can flirt with protest votes. But let’s not pretend this means Britain’s workers have suddenly become a Reform movement. Yes, one JL Partners poll put Reform and Labour level among trade union members at 28% each. That is serious. Labour should listen. But Reform’s wider base still skews heavily older. Much of its strength is with older voters and pension-age Britain, not young working-age Britain. Farage calls it a workers’ revolt. But much of Reform’s energy still looks more like a pensioner revolt, fuelled by years of billionaire-owned newspapers and outrage media telling people who to blame. So Farage is doing what he always does. He takes one real frustration and turns it into a whole national myth about himself. Trade unions are not just voter banks. They are workplace protections. Pay negotiations. Safety rights. Maternity rights. Collective bargaining. Legal support. Industrial power. So the question is not whether Farage can give a speech saying he is on the side of working people. The question is simple: What would Reform actually do when workers organise, strike, demand better pay, challenge bad employers, and ask for stronger rights? Because welcoming union leaders to a conference is easy. Standing with workers when business interests push back is the real test. I may be wrong, but that is how I see it. What do you think? #LessNoiseMoreDelivery x.com/Nigel_Farage/status/20…
Nigel Farage MP

2
3
14
495
TomSoede, the self-proclaimed "facts & hypocrisy" expert whose bio should read "owned by Tina." You slam Lee Anderson for dodging "operational questions" on a Hampshire murder. I politely pointed out he wrote to Nottinghamshire Police about their actual policy. And you instantly reply, "This letter is a farce - a joke. Thank you for pointing that out!" Peak self-own: all #LessNoiseMoreDelivery noise, zero delivery.
30
Here are my rules of engaments:They are simple but open: Please feel free to share, argue, challenge me, correct me, or invite me to go deeper. I welcome debate. I welcome disagreement. I do not want an echo chamber. But there are a couple of simple rules: 1. If you are rude, abusive or deliberately disrespectful, I will mute or block you. 2. If you post a reply and do not want it challenged, questioned or debated, simply say so in your reply. We can disagree without being disagreeable. We can challenge ideas without attacking people. I may be wrong, but that is how I see it. I love you all ! #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
1
1
11
255
I so agree with you !! He is groing stronger by the day ! Why ? Because he is not chasing noise. He is building stability. After years of chaos, Britain finally has a Prime Minister focused on repair, growth and serious government. Not theatre. Not rage. Delivery. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
1
13
57
Replying to @LeeAndersonMP_
Lee Anderson has now written to Nottinghamshire Police about Henry Nowak. But something doesn’t add up. A serious letter would ask clear operational questions: What happened? What decisions were made? Were mistakes made? What lessons will be learned? How will the public be kept safe? Instead, Lee moves quickly into “two-tier policing”, DEI training and race-based decision-making. That may suit Reform’s political narrative. But where is the evidence that Henry Nowak’s case was caused by DEI training? Where is the evidence that officers failed to act because of race or religion? A grieving family asked for calm. The public deserves answers. But answers are not the same as culture-war theatre. Henry deserves justice. Not another Reform performance. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
10
10
75
1,649
Dear Andy Burnham, I am writing this with respect. Becaus I like you and I think many Labour people like you. You have done serious work in Greater Manchester. The buses matter. The Bee Network matters. Devolution matters. Regional pride matters. Having strong Labour voices outside Westminster matters. And I understand why people listen to you. You speak with feeling. You sound rooted. You understand that politics is not just about spreadsheets, press conferences and Westminster management. It is also about place. Pride. Belonging. Dignity. The feeling that people have not been forgotten. That matters. So this is not an attack on you. Not at all. But I do worry. Every time Labour starts trying to govern seriously, the media machine starts looking for a Labour soap opera. A split. A rivalry. A leadership question. A whisper. A headline. A “what if?” And suddenly the story is not homes. Not the NHS. Not prisons. Not wages. Not transport. Not energy. Not the damage left behind after fourteen years of Conservative chaos. The story becomes Labour talking about Labour. And that is exactly what Reform wants. It is exactly what the Conservatives want. It is exactly what the outrage machine (media) wants. Because while Labour talks to itself, Farage talks to the country. While Labour gets dragged into personality drama, Reform sells anger as a plan. While Labour debates who should lead, the people who broke Britain get another chance to pretend they are the answer. And we cannot afford that. Keir Starmer has the mandate. You have an important voice. Labour has a job. And Britain has problems that will not be fixed by another Westminster personality contest. I want your voice in the Labour movement. I want your strength in the Labour movement. I want your record in Greater Manchester to be part of Labour’s story. But please do not let them turn you into a weapon against a Labour government that is trying to rebuild Britain. Because the people pushing this drama are not doing it because they care about you. They are not doing it because they care about Labour. They are not doing it because they care about working people in Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool, Newcastle, Glasgow, Cardiff, London or anywhere else. They are doing it because division sells. They are doing it because Labour unity frightens them. They are doing it because a serious Labour government, given time to deliver, is dangerous to the whole Reform and Tory grievance machine. So my message is simple. You should be respected. Keir Starmer should be backed. Labour should stay focused. And Andy, please do not let personal ambition derail the Labour delivery machine. That is basically my ask to you. The country has had enough theatre. Boris gave us theatre. Truss gave us madness. Sunak gave us management speak. Farage gives us rage. Reform gives us recycled Tory chaos with a louder microphone. Labour must give Britain something better. Stability. Seriousness. Discipline. Delivery. Dear Andy, Labour needs your voice. But it does not need another soap opera. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
61
112
374
25,996
He Has the Mandate. He Is Doing the Work. People keep saying Britain needs a new Prime Minister because that is what the media is aiming for - more clicks, more listeners and more money But I keep asking myself: Why? Keir Starmer inherited a country exhausted by chaos. A country worn down by fourteen years of Conservative mismanagement. Public services under pressure. The NHS stretched. Prisons overcrowded. Housing too expensive. Borders left in a mess. Councils struggling. Workers tired. Families squeezed. Trust in politics damaged almost beyond recognition. And into that mess came a Prime Minister who did not promise magic. He did not arrive with circus tricks. He did not pretend that slogans could rebuild a country. He came in with something much rarer in modern politics. Seriousness. Discipline. Focus. Work. And maybe that is why some people do not know what to do with him. Because Britain has been trained to expect politics as entertainment. Noise. Drama. Outrage. Punchlines. Flags. Performances. Men shouting into microphones as if anger itself is a plan. We have had years of politics as entertainment. Boris gave people theatre. Truss gave people madness. Sunak gave people management speak. Farage gives people rage. Reform gives people recycled Tory chaos with a louder microphone. And Keir Starmer? He gives people something much less dramatic. Work. Difficult work. Unfashionable work. The kind of work that does not always trend on X. The kind of work that does not produce a dopamine hit. The kind of work that does not satisfy people who want politics to feel like a football chant. But that does not mean it is not happening. Keir Starmer is doing something different. He is trying to move Britain from chaos to stability. From slogans to delivery. From performance to government. From short-term theatre to long-term repair. That may not always be loud. It may not always trend. It may not satisfy people who want politics to feel like a daily fight. But it is leadership. Real leadership is not always dramatic. Sometimes it is calm. Sometimes it is patient. Sometimes it is the person who walks into the wreckage and starts rebuilding while everyone else is still shouting about who caused the fire. And that is what Keir is doing. He is rebuilding trust. Rebuilding competence. Rebuilding Britain’s reputation. Rebuilding the idea that government should be serious again. So no, I do not want a new Prime Minister. I want this Prime Minister to be given the time and space to finish the job Britain elected Labour to do. Because after years of chaos, the country does not need another personality contest. It needs stability. It needs seriousness. It needs delivery. And it has a Prime Minister who understands that. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery.
194
166
383
7,557
Replying to @TedUrchin @UKLabour
Ted, I am with you. Keir Starmer gets attacked from every side, every day. Too boring. Too left. Too right. Too serious. Not loud enough for the circus. But while others perform outrage, he is actually delivering for the UK: • Millions more NHS appointments • The biggest upgrade to workers’ rights in a generation • Action on energy bills and cost of living • More social and affordable housing reform • Stronger defence and national security focus • A serious reset with Europe • A government trying to rebuild after 14 years of chaos It may not be flashy. It may not satisfy the people who want politics to be a daily boxing match. But delivery is not always loud. Sometimes it is steady. Sometimes it is boring. Sometimes it is exactly what the country needs. #LessnoiseMoredelivery.
23
101
263
3,456
Sitting on a bench on a beautiful Sunday morning in my local park, I had a video of Robert Jenrick come up on my timeline on X. And something doesn’t add up. Because every time Robert Jenrick appears on television, he speaks as if he has just discovered Britain’s problems from the outside. As if he was not there. As if he had not been part of the Conservative government. As if he had not sat inside the machine that helped create the mess he now complains about. That is the strange thing about the Conservative-to-Reform pipeline. They govern for years. They break things. They watch the NHS struggle. They watch housing become impossible. They watch prisons fill up. They watch councils collapse. They watch immigration become a political weapon. They watch trust in government drain away. And then, when the public finally gets angry, they step forward and say: “Look what has happened to the country.” As if they were innocent bystanders. Robert Jenrick is not some fresh political outsider. He is not a man arriving from nowhere with clean hands and a brave new plan. He was part of the Conservative government. He was part of the Conservative record. He was part of the politics that promised control and delivered chaos. And now, as a Reform MP, he wants to sound like the solution to the very failure his old party helped create. That is the trick. Take responsibility. Remove the memory. Add a harsher tone. Blame someone else. Call it courage. And then, for the final act as a Conservative MP, go down to the Tube and start checking fare dodgers like Britain’s problems can be solved one Oyster card at a time. Then as a Reform MP move on to stolen tools, as if working people only started suffering from theft after the Conservatives left office. I am not saying fare dodging does not matter. I am not saying stolen tools do not matter. They do. Rules matter. Fairness matters. Public order matters. And when someone has their tools stolen, that is not a small thing. That can mean a lost day’s work. But when a man who sat inside fourteen years of Conservative government, and is now wearing a Reform badge, starts presenting himself as the nation’s ticket inspector and the defender of every stolen toolbox, you are allowed to ask a slightly larger question: Where was this energy when the country was being run into the ground? Because Britain does not need another former Conservative politician, now wearing a Reform badge, trying to rebrand failure as toughness. It does not need more speeches designed to sound strong while avoiding the basic question: Where were you when all this was happening? Robert Jenrick was not outside the room. He was in the room. And that matters. The country needs seriousness now. It needs delivery. It needs honesty about what went wrong. It needs people willing to rebuild, not people trying to escape their own record by shouting louder. Robert Jenrick may want to present himself as the future of Reform. But to me, he looks like something much more familiar: Old Conservative failure looking for a new microphone. A ticket barrier. And a stolen toolbox. Britain deserves better. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
9
86
202
7,832
Replying to @ZiaYusufUK
Gratitude attack #1 I think we should all say thank you to Zia Yusuf this morning after his BBC interview. Not because I agree with him. I don’t. Not because I think Reform has suddenly become serious. It hasn’t. But because Britain has had enough of people who turn every issue into a robotic performance empty of empathy. We do not need another political theatre company telling the country it is on fire while handing out petrol and calling it courage, handing out “cold rage” while pretending they are the fire brigade. Gratitude attack #2 For Zia Yusuf to become something like “Minister for Homeland Security” or Home Secretary, he would normally need to be in Parliament. That means either winning a seat as an MP, or being placed in the House of Lords. That is very unlikely to happen. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
4
2
15
732
When I woke up this morning, I started to think: why Suella Braverman? Why does she keep coming back into the national conversation? Why does a politician who already sat at the heart of power still present herself as if she is some outsider banging on the door? And then it struck me. Suella Braverman is useful to the right because she performs anger very well. She gives people the theatre of toughness. The raised voice. The hard words. The dramatic warnings. The sense that everything is collapsing and only people like her are brave enough to say it. But here is the problem. She was not watching government from the sidelines. She was in it. She was Home Secretary. She had power. She had a platform. She had access to the machinery of the state. And yet now she talks as though Britain’s problems simply appeared yesterday, delivered by Labour, immigrants, lawyers, judges, civil servants, human rights, or whoever the latest enemy of the week happens to be. That is the trick. Turn failure into rage. Turn responsibility into performance. Turn government record into opposition theatre. Suella Braverman is not anti-establishment. She is what happens when the establishment fails, then grabs a microphone and blames everyone else. And this is why the Conservative-to-Reform pipeline matters. Because it is not really a new politics. It is the old Conservative failure trying to escape the crime scene wearing a different badge. Same language. Same fear. Same division. Same people who had their chance. Different stage. Britain does not need more rage from politicians who already held power. Britain needs seriousness. Competence. Decency. Delivery. Suella Braverman is not the answer to Conservative failure. She is one of its loudest symptoms. Britain deserves better. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
39
188
467
15,115
Reform’s Government Reorganisation Plan Isn’t Reform. It’s Capture Something doesn’t add up and it is keeping me up! Reform keep telling people they are the party of freedom. Freedom from elites. Freedom from the establishment. Freedom from the “blob”. Freedom from unelected power. Sounds nice. Until you look at what they actually want. Because this is not just a civil service plan. It is a government re-organiosation plan. Scrap the Cabinet Office. Break up the Cabinet Secretary role. Centralise more power around No.10. Treat independent institutions as obstacles. That is not small government. That is not democratic renewal. That is not “taking back control”. That is political capture dressed up as patriotism. The civil service is not perfect. Of course it isn’t. It can be slow. It can be cautious. It can be frustrating. It can hide behind process. Fine. But the answer to that is reform, competence and accountability. Once you start saying civil servants must be politically obedient to one party’s agenda, you are no longer improving the state. You are replacing neutrality with fear. And that matters. It really really matters. Because that is how government stops serving the country and starts serving the people at the top. And here is the irony. Reform say they hate the establishment. But this is exactly how establishments protect themselves. Not by making institutions independent. But by filling them with loyalists. Not by welcoming scrutiny. But by punishing disagreement. Not by improving delivery. But by controlling the machine. We have seen this language before. Attack the courts. Attack the civil service. Attack the media. Attack regulators. Attack anyone who says, “slow down, where is the evidence?” Then call every safeguard a conspiracy. Call every expert a traitor. Call every institution “the enemy”. Again and again. And once people are angry enough, present party control as liberation. That is the trick. Reform are not offering a cleaner state. They are offering a more obedient one. Real reform makes government work better for the public. Fake reform makes government work harder for the party. There is a difference. We are seeing Project 2025 enter through the backdoor. And Britain needs to see it before it is dressed up as patriotism. If you are interested in the details here is the link - its scary. instituteforgovernment.org.u… #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
18
94
174
4,253
Replying to @Artemisfornow
This is exactly why Labour politicians need to be careful with language. The issue is not whether people are allowed to support Reform. Of course they are. The issue is whether voters are being manipulated by misinformation, bots, troll farms and rage-farming politics. But when Labour says “Farage is a threat to democracy,” Reform instantly turns that into: “Look, they want to silence ordinary people.” That feeds their narrative. The better argument is transparency. Who is amplifying the misinformation? Who is funding the campaigns? Who benefits from the anger? Who profits when facts are buried under outrage? Don’t give Reform the victim costume. Expose the machinery. Expose the hypocrisy. Expose the money. Expose the fake outrage. Beat rage politics with facts, delivery and calm democratic confidence. #LessNoiseMoreDelivery
6
73