Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
๐Ÿœ๏ธ Stats on the Portland Trail Blazers (19-20) and how we can win ๐Ÿ”ง Net Rating -2.4 (22nd) ๐Ÿ”ง Offensive Rating 114.9 (23rd) ๐Ÿ”ง Defensive Rating 117.3 (19th) ๐Ÿ”ง True Shooting 56.7% (24th) ๐Ÿ”ง Effective FG 52.5% (27th) ๐Ÿ”ง Assist Rate 61.1% (18th) ๐Ÿ”ง Turnover Rate 16.6% (30th) ๐Ÿ”ง Rebound Rate 50.5% (10th) ๐Ÿ”ง Def Rebound Rate 71.0% (29th) ๐Ÿ”ง Off Rebound Rate 30.8% (3rd) ๐Ÿ”ง Steal Rate 7.9% (22nd) ๐Ÿ”ง Block Rate 5.3% (16th) ๐Ÿ”ง Free Throw Rate 30.0 (4th) ๐Ÿ”ง 3P Attempt Rate 45.8% (5th) ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ The Knicks should attack Portland by pushing the pace against their 117.3 defensive rating (19th) and 16.6% turnover rate (30th), space the floor to exploit 56.7% TS (24th) and 52.5% eFG (27th), and crash the offensive glass versus their 30.8% ORR (3rd) ๐Ÿ“Š How teams guard Portland top 3 Off threats ๐Ÿ”ง Deni Avdija: 661 (shot attempts) ๐Ÿœ๏ธ Helper 20.3% | Non-Contested 19.4% | POA 18.9% | Wing 13.3% | Mobile Big 10.9% | Chaser 9.8% | Anchor 4.4% | Low 3.0% ๐Ÿ“‰ Deni Avdija weaknesses (databallr.com/dashboard) ๐Ÿ“‰ Defensive DPM -0.5 (32nd percentile) โ€” negative overall defensive impact ๐Ÿ“‰ Defensive FG Attempts Allowed 18 (24th percentile opponents shoot often vs him) ๐Ÿ“‰ Shots Allowed at the Rim 6.8 (24th percentile frequent rim attacks allowed) ๐Ÿ“‰ Rim FG% Differential -3.7% (40th percentile opponents finish better than expected) ๐Ÿ“‰ Stop Rate 1.7% (7th percentile rarely ends possessions) ๐Ÿ“‰ Steals 1.1 (20th percentile low ball disruption) ๐Ÿ“‰ Blocks 0.8 (27th percentile limited rim protection) ๐Ÿ“‰ Forced Turnovers vs Fouls -0.7 (17th percentile fouls more than he forces TOs) ๐Ÿ“‰ Scoring Turnover Rate 9.3% (28th percentile loses efficiency when pressured) ๐Ÿ“‰ Two-Point FG% 53.4% (35th percentile below-average finishing inside) ๐Ÿ“‰ Assist-Adjusted eFG 61.0 (22nd percentile passes donโ€™t lead to efficient shots) ๐Ÿ“‰ Passes per Minute 2.3 (37th percentile limited playmaking volume) ๐Ÿ“‰ Defensive Rebound Rate 15.8% (68th percentile solid but not enough to offset defense) ๐Ÿ”ง Shaedon Sharpe: 632 ๐Ÿœ๏ธ POA 21.0% | Non-Contested 18.8% | Helper 16.5% | Mobile Big 12.7% | Wing 11.6% | Chaser 10.4% | Anchor 5.4% | Low 3.6% ๐Ÿ”ง Toumani Camara: 428 ๐Ÿœ๏ธ Helper 28.7% | POA 16.1% | Wing 14.5% | Non-Contested 11.4% | Mobile Big 11.2% | Chaser 9.8% | Low 4.2% | Anchor 4.0% ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Teams help off Deni Avdija 39.7% of the time (20.3% Helper, 19.4% Non-Contested), reflecting low on-ball pressure. The numbers justify it: -0.5 D-DPM (32%), -0.3 DRAPM, 18 DFGA, 6.8 rim attempts allowed, and a -3.7% rim diff, with a 1.7% Stop rate. He doesnโ€™t create disruption (1.1 STL, 0.8 BLK) and under pressure his offense dips (53.4% 2P, 9.3% sTOV, 61.0 ASTEFG). Game plan: help off, attack him at the rim, and force him to defend actions. #newyorkforever #snyk #ripcity #NBATwitter #NBAAnalytics #FilmRoom #nba #nyc #NY #NYKx #hoop #Analytics #ShotQuality #OnBallDefense #MatchupData #BasketballIQ #HoopsTwitter #DataBallr #AdvancedStats
1
3
987
๐Ÿงฎ Whoโ€™s Guarding Who? ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ“ โ€“ Break down each playerโ€™s contested shots by position in the 1st 30 games (nbavisuals.com/team_breakdowโ€ฆ) ๐Ÿ—ฝ Knicks 21-9 ๐Ÿ“ % shows which position is guarding each player ๐Ÿ€ (Min 100 contest) ๐Ÿ—ฝ Jalen Brunson (554 contested shots) G: 48.4% | F: 29.6% | C: 11.2% | Non-Contested: 10.8% ๐Ÿ—ฝ Karl-Anthony Towns (413) C: 38.7% | F: 29.5% | G: 13.3% | Non-Contested: 18.4% ๐Ÿ—ฝ Mikal Bridges (373) G: 40.8% | F: 36.2% | C: 10.2% | Non-Contested: 12.9% ๐Ÿ—ฝ Jordan Clarkson (244) G: 50.8% | F: 30.7% | C: 5.7% | Non-Contested: 12.7% ๐Ÿ—ฝ Josh Hart (250) F: 38.8% | G: 28.4% | C: 16.8% | Non-Contested: 16.0% ๐Ÿ—ฝ OG Anunoby (227) F: 40.1% | G: 31.7% | C: 16.7% | Non-Contested: 11.5% ๐Ÿ—ฝ Miles McBride (181) G: 57.5% | F: 22.7% | C: 11.0% | Non-Contested: 8.8% ๐Ÿ—ฝ Tyler Kolek (108) G: 53.7% | F: 21.3% | C: 12.0% | Non-Contested: 13.0% ๐Ÿ—’๏ธ Looking at contested shots, guards are the main defenders on Jalen Brunson 48.4% (F 29.6%, C 11.2%), Tyler Kolek 53.7% (F 21.3%, C 12.0%), and Miles McBride 57.5% (F 22.7%, C 11.0%). Forwards lead on Josh Hart 38.8% (G 28.4%, C 16.8%) and OG Anunoby 40.1% (G 31.7%, C 16.7%). Karl-Anthony Towns is mostly contested by centers 38.7% (F 29.5%, G 13.3%), Mikal Bridges by guards 40.8% (F 36.2%, Non 12.9%), and Jordan Clarkson by guards 50.8% (F 30.7%, Non 12.7%). Secondary defenders from different positions show cross-matching to exploit mismatches and disrupt spacing. Hereโ€™s Mike Brown Post Game interview his exchange with Kolek last game which he lovedโฌโฌโฌโฌโฌโฌโฌ #NBA #NBAShots #NBAnalytics #NBAStats #Knicks #NYK #SNYK #NYKx #NewYorkKnicks #NewYorkForever #ShotMap #PlayerTracking #BasketballAnalytics #NBAInsights #ContestedShots #MatchupData #KnicksAnalytics
1
3
11
1,782
In a 29-year sample of matchupdata, Caruso is head-and-shoulders above everyone else when it comes to forcing opponent turnovers Where does he rank, overall, among the best defenders since 1997? roycewebb.com/p/alex-caruso-โ€ฆ
4
4
21
2,638
This led to the following alphas: Players Off: 2000 Players Def: 8000 Coaches Off: 8000 Coaches Def: 2000 Data: 1997-2024 matchupdata Possession outcome adjusted for age and rubber-band-effect
3
6
2,222
Replying to @knarsu3 @kpelton
What I calculated for these seasons was using simulated matchupdata based off of game MP and average playing time distribution according to score etc This is using actual matchupdata I believe, but slightly different algorithms, generally
2
@_rahul24 I think you can buy "matchupdata" here nbastuffer.com/ but I can't say anything about the quality

Replying to @bbstats
@bbstats That's not actually RPM. Since we have no PBP for that year it's mostly SPM with a dash of RAPM from "fake" matchupdata
1
1